Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




1353 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 281

Subscriber

# 208076 25-Jan-2017 19:52
Send private message

Just got a final confirmation from the banking ombudsman today;

 

If you are a joint signatory on an account (including business accounts), the other party(s) can remove you from the bank account and the bank has no obligation to inform you of this event.

 

That's it - straight forward and simple. You have no expectation of being notified if your access to your account changes.

 

So - if you are in the situation - don't assume you are safe.

 

The nasty back twist - if you are in a two person, joint signatory situation, then because after your removal the signatory is changed to single person, then you have no legal recourse to be added back - other than straight out litigation or criminal complaint.

 

 

 

 





nunz

Create new topic
14804 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2007


  # 1709595 25-Jan-2017 20:14
2 people support this post
Send private message

You would think both parties would need to give permission. Weird.


3699 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2166

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1709616 25-Jan-2017 21:01
One person supports this post
Send private message

It seems ridiculous that both signatories or proof of death are not required.





Information wants to be free. The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.


 
 
 
 


1233 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 60


  # 1709810 26-Jan-2017 09:42
Send private message

Happened to me. Got home one day, "you've been having an affair, get out of my house you piece of work". Of course there was no affair or any reason to suspect it, however I was surprised I was simply removed from the joint mortgage. I never had to go see the bank or sign anything.

I iz your trusted friend
5832 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 147

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1709820 26-Jan-2017 09:46
Send private message

Wow... this can happen?? 





Internet is my backyard...

 

«Geekzone blog: Tech 'n Chips Takeaway» «Personal blog: And then...»

 

Please read the Geekzone's FUG

 


757 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 245


  # 1709892 26-Jan-2017 10:52
Send private message

you would have to wonder if by extension to that ruling, that liability is also removed?

 

I can understand that with a joint account either party has the right to transact on the account (except where joint signatures are required) so it stands to reason that either party could remove the other from the account, but what if that account had an overdraft. By the actions of party a removing party b, does party b no longer have any liability for the overdraft (or mortgage or loan or whatever)?

 

 


Mr Snotty
8586 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4486

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1709943 26-Jan-2017 11:59
Send private message

Disclaimer: I work for a bank. Mandate is a bank term for the list of signatories.

 

The signatories can be set to "2 to sign" for everything including a change of signatories. This depends on how the signatories are set up, sometimes they'll be set up for 2 to sign for withdrawls however just a single signatory for changes to the mandate depending on the customers needs.

 

For example. A business wants to list people on the account - they'll normally do something like this:
Withdrawls, Transfers - 1 to sign.
Changes, account opening / closing / change of mandate: 2 to sign alongside listed director(s).

 

If somebody phones up saying "xx has passed away" we have to take their word for it and take a notification of death - normally people are not stupid enough to do a notification of death for somebody who is still alive. For relationship disputes blocks are normally placed on an account until both parties sort it out with the bank in a branch.

 

The bank doesn't have to notify all signatories on the mandate of a mandate change but the mandate should be set up in a way that most signatories have to have their say of a change (the bank does have to abide by the customers need here). Technically, the bank is the third party here.

Rule of thumb - if you've got a joint account with your significat other ensure it is 2 to sign for account opening / closing and changes to both the mandate and account. If anything goes wrong in the relationship be sure to phone your bank and log a relationship dispute and don't be a dick by transferring the money before you do this - keep it clean as this means both parties need to sort out with the bank what happens with the payments, mortgage etc before their accounts are unblocked / seperated so it is often the cleanest way to ensure you've got your say.





404 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 310


  # 1709954 26-Jan-2017 12:15
Send private message

I was a joint signatory to a set of accounts. The other signatory was unable to act, due to serious illness, and due to the mandated two signatory rule I was unable to manage the accounts (I could transact, but not manage). I was required, by Westpac, to use my Power of Attorney authority to act on behalf of the second person. Westpac required me to lodge a copy of the PoA into their system, for each account. They were very professional and helpful in the circumstances; but they did act to ensure the interests of the second signatory were protected.

To be honest I did forget we set up the joint accounts according to the two signatory rule and was a bit surprised to learn I couldn't make changes without the second signature. Not a big deal, but I had forgotten.




BlinkyBill

Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

HPE to acquire supercomputing leader Cray
Posted 20-May-2019 11:07


Techweek starting around NZ today
Posted 20-May-2019 09:52


Porirua City Council first to adopt new council software solution Datascape
Posted 15-May-2019 12:00


New survey provides insight into schools' technology challenges and plans
Posted 15-May-2019 09:30


Apple Music now available on Alexa devices in Australia and New Zealand
Posted 15-May-2019 09:11


Make a stand against cyberbullying this Pink Shirt Day
Posted 14-May-2019 20:23


Samsung first TV manufacturer to launch the Apple TV App and Airplay 2
Posted 14-May-2019 20:11


Vodafone New Zealand sold
Posted 14-May-2019 07:25


Kordia boosts cloud performance with locally-hosted Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute
Posted 8-May-2019 10:25


Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute in New Zealand opens up faster, more secure internet for Kiwi businesses
Posted 8-May-2019 09:39


Vocus Communications to deliver Microsoft Azure Cloud Solutions through Azure ExpressRoute
Posted 8-May-2019 09:25


Independent NZ feature film #statusPending to premiere during WLG-X
Posted 6-May-2019 22:13


The ultimate dog photoshoot with Nokia 9 PureView #ForgottenDogsofInstagram
Posted 6-May-2019 09:41


Nokia 9 PureView available in New Zealand
Posted 6-May-2019 09:06


Motorola Solutions joins local partners to deliver advanced communications network in New Zealand
Posted 30-Apr-2019 21:50



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.