Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




1370 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 283

Subscriber

# 208076 25-Jan-2017 19:52
Send private message

Just got a final confirmation from the banking ombudsman today;

 

If you are a joint signatory on an account (including business accounts), the other party(s) can remove you from the bank account and the bank has no obligation to inform you of this event.

 

That's it - straight forward and simple. You have no expectation of being notified if your access to your account changes.

 

So - if you are in the situation - don't assume you are safe.

 

The nasty back twist - if you are in a two person, joint signatory situation, then because after your removal the signatory is changed to single person, then you have no legal recourse to be added back - other than straight out litigation or criminal complaint.

 

 

 

 





nunz

Create new topic
14886 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2019


  # 1709595 25-Jan-2017 20:14
2 people support this post
Send private message

You would think both parties would need to give permission. Weird.


3720 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2182

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1709616 25-Jan-2017 21:01
One person supports this post
Send private message

It seems ridiculous that both signatories or proof of death are not required.





Information wants to be free. The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.


 
 
 
 


1242 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 62


  # 1709810 26-Jan-2017 09:42
Send private message

Happened to me. Got home one day, "you've been having an affair, get out of my house you piece of work". Of course there was no affair or any reason to suspect it, however I was surprised I was simply removed from the joint mortgage. I never had to go see the bank or sign anything.

I iz your trusted friend
5833 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 147

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1709820 26-Jan-2017 09:46
Send private message

Wow... this can happen?? 





Internet is my backyard...

 

«Geekzone blog: Tech 'n Chips Takeaway» «Personal blog: And then...»

 

Please read the Geekzone's FUG

 


764 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 257


  # 1709892 26-Jan-2017 10:52
Send private message

you would have to wonder if by extension to that ruling, that liability is also removed?

 

I can understand that with a joint account either party has the right to transact on the account (except where joint signatures are required) so it stands to reason that either party could remove the other from the account, but what if that account had an overdraft. By the actions of party a removing party b, does party b no longer have any liability for the overdraft (or mortgage or loan or whatever)?

 

 


Mr Snotty
8680 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4566

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1709943 26-Jan-2017 11:59
Send private message

Disclaimer: I work for a bank. Mandate is a bank term for the list of signatories.

 

The signatories can be set to "2 to sign" for everything including a change of signatories. This depends on how the signatories are set up, sometimes they'll be set up for 2 to sign for withdrawls however just a single signatory for changes to the mandate depending on the customers needs.

 

For example. A business wants to list people on the account - they'll normally do something like this:
Withdrawls, Transfers - 1 to sign.
Changes, account opening / closing / change of mandate: 2 to sign alongside listed director(s).

 

If somebody phones up saying "xx has passed away" we have to take their word for it and take a notification of death - normally people are not stupid enough to do a notification of death for somebody who is still alive. For relationship disputes blocks are normally placed on an account until both parties sort it out with the bank in a branch.

 

The bank doesn't have to notify all signatories on the mandate of a mandate change but the mandate should be set up in a way that most signatories have to have their say of a change (the bank does have to abide by the customers need here). Technically, the bank is the third party here.

Rule of thumb - if you've got a joint account with your significat other ensure it is 2 to sign for account opening / closing and changes to both the mandate and account. If anything goes wrong in the relationship be sure to phone your bank and log a relationship dispute and don't be a dick by transferring the money before you do this - keep it clean as this means both parties need to sort out with the bank what happens with the payments, mortgage etc before their accounts are unblocked / seperated so it is often the cleanest way to ensure you've got your say.





407 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 311


  # 1709954 26-Jan-2017 12:15
Send private message

I was a joint signatory to a set of accounts. The other signatory was unable to act, due to serious illness, and due to the mandated two signatory rule I was unable to manage the accounts (I could transact, but not manage). I was required, by Westpac, to use my Power of Attorney authority to act on behalf of the second person. Westpac required me to lodge a copy of the PoA into their system, for each account. They were very professional and helpful in the circumstances; but they did act to ensure the interests of the second signatory were protected.

To be honest I did forget we set up the joint accounts according to the two signatory rule and was a bit surprised to learn I couldn't make changes without the second signature. Not a big deal, but I had forgotten.




BlinkyBill

Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Xero announces new smarter tools, push into the North American market
Posted 19-Jun-2019 17:20


New report by Unisys shows New Zealanders want action by social platform companies and police to monitor social media sites
Posted 19-Jun-2019 17:09


ASB adds Google Pay option to contactless payments
Posted 19-Jun-2019 17:05


New Zealand PC Market declines on the back of high channel inventory, IDC reports
Posted 18-Jun-2019 17:35


Air New Zealand uses drones to inspect aircraft
Posted 17-Jun-2019 15:39


TCL Electronics launches its first-ever 8K TV
Posted 17-Jun-2019 15:18


E-scooter share scheme launches in Wellington
Posted 17-Jun-2019 12:34


Anyone can broadcast with Kordia Pop Up TV
Posted 13-Jun-2019 10:51


Volvo and Uber present production vehicle ready for self-driving
Posted 13-Jun-2019 10:47


100,000 customers connected to fibre broadband network through Enable
Posted 13-Jun-2019 10:35


5G uptake even faster than expected
Posted 12-Jun-2019 10:01


Xbox showcases 60 anticipated games
Posted 10-Jun-2019 20:24


Trend Micro Turns Public Hotspots into Secure Networks with WiFi Protection for Mobile Devices
Posted 5-Jun-2019 13:24


Bold UK spinoff for beauty software company Flossie
Posted 2-Jun-2019 14:10


Amazon Introduces Echo Show 5
Posted 1-Jun-2019 15:32



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.