Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
3176 posts

Uber Geek


  #1714417 2-Feb-2017 12:04
Send private message

networkn:

 

Geektastic:

 

Of course. No problem and anyone who applies for citizenship this way still has to pass the usual background checks, health checks and so on.

 

The only difference is that they do not need to prove that they have a job or useful skills - which, given that they already have a heap of money is hardly necessary.

 

Why would you not want to bring entrepreneurial people and wealthy people to NZ? We have to get the income of the nation up somehow and whatever we've been doing for the last 150 years has hardly achieved a lot in that respect. We still have far too much of the tax burden falling on too few people.

 

 

 

 

The question for me, is WILL he provide any value. Time will tell, but I'll be pretty surprised if he spends significant funds here other than buying land, so I expect his tax contribution to be minimal. 

 

 

pretty sure he wont be a drain on it either.





Common sense is not as common as you think.


14440 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1714420 2-Feb-2017 12:08
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

networkn:

 

 

 

I'd like you to cite which different rules were applied to him than anyone else. Specifically. 

 

Can you show which rules he has breached in any way?

 

 

I'm not sure any rules were applied to him. I think he just threw a ton of money around, got some other rich people to write letters of support, and received his citizenship.

 

I doubt he breached any rules, since none were applied to him. Anyway, that is not my question. My question is whether people think this is a good thing or not. For my part, I'm not sure. It offends my sense of fair play but I also see the positives. I'm not sure where the line should be drawn, so I am asking what others think. Even you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

You can read the entirety of the rules that were applied and the advice given to the Minister in the OIA released documents currently on the web here






 
 
 
 


22536 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1714421 2-Feb-2017 12:09
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

networkn:

 

 

 

I'd like you to cite which different rules were applied to him than anyone else. Specifically. 

 

Can you show which rules he has breached in any way?

 

 

I'm not sure any rules were applied to him. I think he just threw a ton of money around, got some other rich people to write letters of support, and received his citizenship.

 

I doubt he breached any rules, since none were applied to him. Anyway, that is not my question. My question is whether people think this is a good thing or not. For my part, I'm not sure. It offends my sense of fair play but I also see the positives. I'm not sure where the line should be drawn, so I am asking what others think. Even you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

You stated as fact, that different "rules" apply to the rich, which you have yet to substantiate (again). "I think he threw a bunch of money around". Based on what exact evidence?

 

If you don't think he breached any rules, how is it unfair? How can this affect your sense of fair play? Do you have any evidence he was provided an easier route to citizenship than anyone else?

 

 


2514 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1714423 2-Feb-2017 12:21
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

I think one of the main issues with Thiel's citizenship is he doesn't live here and never has, but has only visited a few times, just like many tourists. Different rules for the rich.

 

 

 

 

 

 

But the rich have more to offer, so why wouldn't they be treated differently?




Devastation by stupidity
12052 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1714427 2-Feb-2017 12:33
Send private message

networkn:

 

 

 

 

 

You stated as fact, that different "rules" apply to the rich, which you have yet to substantiate (again). "I think he threw a bunch of money around". Based on what exact evidence?

 

If you don't think he breached any rules, how is it unfair? How can this affect your sense of fair play? Do you have any evidence he was provided an easier route to citizenship than anyone else?

 

 

There are plenty of links that go into this, such as those on RNZ and Stuff. If you are interested, look them up yourself.

 

The $1 million he gave to the Christchurch rebuild is a matter of public record and Rod Drury mentions some of his investments. He didn't even have to come to New Zealand for his citizenship ceremony, let alone spend any significant amount of time here. That sounds like an easier route to citizenship to me.

 

 





I don't think there is ever a bad time to talk about how absurd war is, how old men make decisions and young people die. - George Clooney
 


359 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1714432 2-Feb-2017 12:37
Send private message

No it shouldn't, plain and simple to me.


22536 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1714433 2-Feb-2017 12:42
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

networkn:

 

 

 

 

 

You stated as fact, that different "rules" apply to the rich, which you have yet to substantiate (again). "I think he threw a bunch of money around". Based on what exact evidence?

 

If you don't think he breached any rules, how is it unfair? How can this affect your sense of fair play? Do you have any evidence he was provided an easier route to citizenship than anyone else?

 

 

There are plenty of links that go into this, such as those on RNZ and Stuff. If you are interested, look them up yourself.

 

The $1 million he gave to the Christchurch rebuild is a matter of public record and Rod Drury mentions some of his investments. He didn't even have to come to New Zealand for his citizenship ceremony, let alone spend any significant amount of time here. That sounds like an easier route to citizenship to me.

 

 

 

 

Err I think you are confusing the two matters. He donated some money to NZ causes, as did a lot of people NOT looking for citizenship. Even if it WAS for that reason, I see that as proving his value. 

 

There is no evidence (unless you can show me) that suggests he was not made to comply with all the regulations of anyone else applying, let alone because he "threw some money around".

 

It's not mandatory to attend citizen ceremony. There are provisions for this in the regulations (Outlined above for your information). Nor is it mandatory for him to spend time here as a citizen. You might be interested to know lots of wealthy Kiwis who are citizens don't spend much time here. 

 

 

 

 


 
 
 
 




Devastation by stupidity
12052 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1714436 2-Feb-2017 12:48
Send private message

dickytim:

 

 

 

But the rich have more to offer, so why wouldn't they be treated differently?

 

 

This is actually an interesting point and worth thinking about. If they invest in local enterprise, either by forming new companies or helping existing ones to grow, and also create jobs, especially high-quality ones, that hardly seems like a bad thing. But money has the potential to corrupt, as well. If it is used to build mega-industries that destroy the features and values that make New Zealand special, then maybe that isn't so good. If many wealthy people settle here, the mere fact of their wealth can distort the local economy, putting things like beach holidays and stunning views out of the reach of ordinary people. Great wealth can create great wealth disparity, actually resulting in more poverty for more people. If the rich are able and willing to pay more for things, those things become inaccessible to the less rich. Money can be a good thing, but not if people allow themselves to be blinded by it.

 

 





I don't think there is ever a bad time to talk about how absurd war is, how old men make decisions and young people die. - George Clooney
 


15132 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1714440 2-Feb-2017 12:55
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

networkn:

 

 

 

I'd like you to cite which different rules were applied to him than anyone else. Specifically. 

 

Can you show which rules he has breached in any way?

 

 

I'm not sure any rules were applied to him. I think he just threw a ton of money around, got some other rich people to write letters of support, and received his citizenship.

 

I doubt he breached any rules, since none were applied to him. Anyway, that is not my question. My question is whether people think this is a good thing or not. For my part, I'm not sure. It offends my sense of fair play but I also see the positives. I'm not sure where the line should be drawn, so I am asking what others think. Even you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please show me what you base this accusation on.





Mike
Change Management Consultant
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

He waka eke noa




Devastation by stupidity
12052 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1714442 2-Feb-2017 13:00
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

 

 

Please show me what you base this accusation on.

 

 

What accusation exactly? I said 'I'm not sure...' and 'I think...' Those are expressions of opinion, not accusation.

 

 





I don't think there is ever a bad time to talk about how absurd war is, how old men make decisions and young people die. - George Clooney
 


10120 posts

Uber Geek


  #1714445 2-Feb-2017 13:12
Send private message

The folks who argue that stateless refugees be offered no charity seem to be the same people arguing that they have "no issue" with citizenship for sale.


22536 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1714448 2-Feb-2017 13:16
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

MikeB4:

 

 

 

Please show me what you base this accusation on.

 

 

What accusation exactly? I said 'I'm not sure...' and 'I think...' Those are expressions of opinion, not accusation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now that people have shown you the regulations and there is no evidence to support he breached them, are you now prepared to change your position?

 

 

 

 


15132 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1714449 2-Feb-2017 13:18
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

MikeB4:

 

 

 

Please show me what you base this accusation on.

 

 

What accusation exactly? I said 'I'm not sure...' and 'I think...' Those are expressions of opinion, not accusation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Your statement infers that the officials did not follows the policy and this is because money was thrown around, that is an accusation. So again can you show evidence of this.





Mike
Change Management Consultant
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

He waka eke noa


15132 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1714450 2-Feb-2017 13:19
Send private message

Fred99:

 

The folks who argue that stateless refugees be offered no charity seem to be the same people arguing that they have "no issue" with citizenship for sale.

 

 

 

 

examples?





Mike
Change Management Consultant
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

He waka eke noa




Devastation by stupidity
12052 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1714455 2-Feb-2017 13:35
Send private message

networkn:

 

Now that people have shown you the regulations and there is no evidence to support he breached them, are you now prepared to change your position?

 

 

I never suggested he breached any regulations so I'm not sure what you are asking. 

 

 





I don't think there is ever a bad time to talk about how absurd war is, how old men make decisions and young people die. - George Clooney
 


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Sony introduces the digital camera ZV-1 for content creators
Posted 27-May-2020 12:47


Samsung Announces 2020 QLED TV Range
Posted 20-May-2020 16:29


D-Link A/NZ launches AI-Powered body temperature measuring system
Posted 20-May-2020 16:22


NortonLifeLock Online Banking Protection now available for New Zealand banks
Posted 20-May-2020 16:14


SD Express delivers new gigabyte speeds for SD memory cards
Posted 20-May-2020 15:00


D-Link A/NZ launches Nuclias cloud managed network solution hosted in Australia
Posted 11-May-2020 17:53


Logitech introduces new video streaming solution for home studios
Posted 11-May-2020 17:48


Next generation Volvo cars to be powered by Luminar LiDAR technology
Posted 7-May-2020 13:56


D-Link A/NZ launches Wi-Fi Certified EasyMesh system
Posted 7-May-2020 13:51


Spark teams up with Microsoft to bring Xbox All Access to New Zealand
Posted 7-May-2020 13:01


Microsoft plans to establish its first datacenter region in New Zealand
Posted 6-May-2020 11:35


Genesis School-gen has joined forces with Mind Lab Kids
Posted 1-May-2020 12:53


Malwarebytes expands into privacy with fast, frictionless VPN
Posted 30-Apr-2020 16:06


Kordia to donate TV airtime on Channel 200 to community groups
Posted 30-Apr-2020 16:00


OPPO A91 is a high specs mid-range smartphone
Posted 23-Apr-2020 16:44



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.