Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
20008 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6091

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1714457 2-Feb-2017 13:37
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

networkn:

 

Now that people have shown you the regulations and there is no evidence to support he breached them, are you now prepared to change your position?

 

 

I never suggested he breached any regulations so I'm not sure what you are asking. 

 

 

 

 

"different rules for the rich" implies he was afforded some courtesy not available (regulations) to others. 

 

 




Fat bottom Trump
9916 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4766

Subscriber

  # 1714459 2-Feb-2017 13:42
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

Your statement infers that the officials did not follows the policy and this is because money was thrown around, that is an accusation. So again can you show evidence of this.

 

 

You are putting words in my mouth. My statement infers that he got special treatment because he made a philanthropic donation and invested in a New Zealand company, both of which are confirmed in the DIA statement. I phrased that sardonically as 'throwing money around' but did not state anything that was untrue. He spent some money and received citizenship, as confirmed by the DIA. 

 

 

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


 
 
 
 




Fat bottom Trump
9916 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4766

Subscriber

  # 1714461 2-Feb-2017 13:47
2 people support this post
Send private message

networkn:

 

 

 

"different rules for the rich" implies he was afforded some courtesy not available (regulations) to others. 

 

 

I would argue that the courtesy he was afforded would not be made available to someone without his money. I think that is beyond dispute.

 

This is starting to feel more like trolling than debate. Go chew on someone else's throat. I have had enough. I will respond to any serious comments having to do with this thread, but I am tired of playing this game.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


277 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 57


  # 1714462 2-Feb-2017 13:50
Send private message

I get that Thiel's lack of living here bothers some However there are some 1 million New Zealand citizens in a similar position, i.e live overseas. As the Statistics New Zealand observes, "Around 45,000 citizens a year leave on a permanent or long-term (PLT) basis. Many of these PLT travellers will eventually return, some bringing their overseas-born spouses and children with them. Others will stay overseas, with various degrees of attachment to New Zealand. Of our newer migrants, some will stay and gain New Zealand citizenship, while others will leave."  No one seriously suggests they should be stripped of their citizenship because "they don't live anymore".  As I say, I abhor Thiel's politics, but the notion that you must live here to be a citizen doesn't hold water. 

 

 

 

[Edit:spelling]





Tinshed
Wellington, New Zealand


14803 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2007


  # 1714464 2-Feb-2017 13:54
One person supports this post
Send private message

Tinshed:

 

I get that Thiel's lack of living here bothers some However there are some 1 million New Zealand citizens in a similar position, i.e live overseas. As the Statistics New Zealand observes, "Around 45,000 citizens a year leave on a permanent or long-term (PLT) basis. Many of these PLT travellers will eventually return, some bringing their overseas-born spouses and children with them. Others will stay overseas, with various degrees of attachment to New Zealand. Of our newer migrants, some will stay and gain New Zealand citizenship, while others will leave."  No one seriously suggests they should be stripped of their citizenship because "they don't live anymore".  As I say, I abhor Thiel's politics, but the notion that you must live here to be a citizen doesn't hold water. 

 

 

 

[Edit:spelling]

 

 

 

 

Most of those living overseas though will have initially lived in NZ, eg born here, or moved here. So it is a totally different thing. I would think it would be unusual to get NZ citizenship but never actually reside here for a significant period of time.


13893 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6642

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1714473 2-Feb-2017 14:06
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

MikeB4:

 

Your statement infers that the officials did not follows the policy and this is because money was thrown around, that is an accusation. So again can you show evidence of this.

 

 

You are putting words in my mouth. My statement infers that he got special treatment because he made a philanthropic donation and invested in a New Zealand company, both of which are confirmed in the DIA statement. I phrased that sardonically as 'throwing money around' but did not state anything that was untrue. He spent some money and received citizenship, as confirmed by the DIA. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I get that, one has to be careful as it can easily sound like corruption has been at play. I don't believe that there has been anything like that. NZ needs people both rich and poor. The more rich that come the more poor that can come.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

Using empathy takes no energy and can gain so much. Try it.

 

 




Fat bottom Trump
9916 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4766

Subscriber

  # 1714475 2-Feb-2017 14:13
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

 

 

I get that, one has to be careful as it can easily sound like corruption has been at play. I don't believe that there has been anything like that. NZ needs people both rich and poor. The more rich that come the more poor that can come.

 

 

In all honesty, corruption never occurred to me and that is not what I was suggesting, certainly not in the sense of someone receiving money under the table for bending the rules. I was just questioning whether potential immigrants should be exempted from procedures normally applied to others solely because they do have wealth. I think that is worth discussing.

 

 

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


20008 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6091

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1714476 2-Feb-2017 14:14
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

MikeB4:

 

 

 

I get that, one has to be careful as it can easily sound like corruption has been at play. I don't believe that there has been anything like that. NZ needs people both rich and poor. The more rich that come the more poor that can come.

 

 

In all honesty, corruption never occurred to me and that is not what I was suggesting, certainly not in the sense of someone receiving money under the table for bending the rules. I was just questioning whether potential immigrants should be exempted from procedures normally applied to others solely because they do have wealth. I think that is worth discussing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But for the last time, that hasn't happened here.


13893 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6642

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1714481 2-Feb-2017 14:16
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

MikeB4:

 

 

 

I get that, one has to be careful as it can easily sound like corruption has been at play. I don't believe that there has been anything like that. NZ needs people both rich and poor. The more rich that come the more poor that can come.

 

 

In all honesty, corruption never occurred to me and that is not what I was suggesting, certainly not in the sense of someone receiving money under the table for bending the rules. I was just questioning whether potential immigrants should be exempted from procedures normally applied to others solely because they do have wealth. I think that is worth discussing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There doesn't need to be an exemption as there are sufficient categories that can legally be applied.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

Using empathy takes no energy and can gain so much. Try it.

 

 


20008 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6091

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1714482 2-Feb-2017 14:18
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

networkn:

 

 

 

"different rules for the rich" implies he was afforded some courtesy not available (regulations) to others. 

 

 

I would argue that the courtesy he was afforded would not be made available to someone without his money. I think that is beyond dispute.

 

This is starting to feel more like trolling than debate. Go chew on someone else's throat. I have had enough. I will respond to any serious comments having to do with this thread, but I am tired of playing this game.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tired of being asked to justify your comments? Yes, I can understand that might prove to be annoying to some. 

 

It is categorically NOT beyond dispute. Show us proof he was afforded courtesies not available to someone without money? Are you saying that no-one else would be allowed to not attend their ceremony? If that was the case why are there regulations that allow it?

 

 

 

 




Fat bottom Trump
9916 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4766

Subscriber

  # 1714489 2-Feb-2017 14:36
One person supports this post
Send private message

Some useful follow-up comments below. The implication (no, I don't have proof) seems to be that Thiel was granted citizenship solely because he wanted it (and was rich, which dazzled the authorities), not because there was any good justification for it. This seems to be the point the critics of it are making. Is New Zealand citizenship something precious and valuable to be bestowed on those who want to live here and be part of the country, or is it a frivolous plaything to be passed around to the wealthy who want it on a whim? 

 

http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/323645/'we-need-to-attract-talent'-sam-morgan

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


12746 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4242

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1714495 2-Feb-2017 14:53
Send private message

Fred99:

 

The folks who argue that stateless refugees be offered no charity seem to be the same people arguing that they have "no issue" with citizenship for sale.

 

 

 

 

One you get a benefit from, the other not so much. Seems perfectly logical to me.






12746 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4242

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1714496 2-Feb-2017 14:59
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

networkn:

 

 

 

"different rules for the rich" implies he was afforded some courtesy not available (regulations) to others. 

 

 

I would argue that the courtesy he was afforded would not be made available to someone without his money. I think that is beyond dispute.

 

This is starting to feel more like trolling than debate. Go chew on someone else's throat. I have had enough. I will respond to any serious comments having to do with this thread, but I am tired of playing this game.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not sure about that. People get citizenship for a variety of special cases, such as sportspeople needed to represent a country who are prevented from doing so by not being citizens. They get the same courtesy but no money is involved.

 

No one 'bought' citizenship here. Thiel was already a Permanent Resident of NZ. He made a case to get citizenship due to his fairly unique experience and position. He was not (as a result of the business activities that give him his unique experience and position) able to satisfy the usual requirements. He applied under existing rules for a grant of citizenship despite that. He was granted it by the Minister on the advice of the relevant officials.

 

Thiel did not turn up, write a cheque and collect citizenship. 








Fat bottom Trump
9916 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4766

Subscriber

  # 1714497 2-Feb-2017 15:00
Send private message

Geektastic:

 

 

 

One you get a benefit from, the other not so much. Seems perfectly logical to me.

 

 

It depends on how you value things. Money can be used in different ways, some good, some not so good. Immigrants tend to work hard and build things up. I would not be too quick to dismiss their contribution.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 




Fat bottom Trump
9916 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4766

Subscriber

  # 1714508 2-Feb-2017 15:06
One person supports this post
Send private message

Geektastic:

 

Thiel did not turn up, write a cheque and collect citizenship. 

 

 

Why did he need citizenship, since he already had the benefits of residency? Why did the authorities feel it was justified, since he was already an investor? What was gained by it since he had no intention of living here? To me it feels like someone collecting baubles, and being allowed to because he was wealthy. I don't understand what the justification was.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Porirua City Council first to adopt new council software solution Datascape
Posted 15-May-2019 12:00


New survey provides insight into schools' technology challenges and plans
Posted 15-May-2019 09:30


Apple Music now available on Alexa devices in Australia and New Zealand
Posted 15-May-2019 09:11


Make a stand against cyberbullying this Pink Shirt Day
Posted 14-May-2019 20:23


Samsung first TV manufacturer to launch the Apple TV App and Airplay 2
Posted 14-May-2019 20:11


Vodafone New Zealand sold
Posted 14-May-2019 07:25


Kordia boosts cloud performance with locally-hosted Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute
Posted 8-May-2019 10:25


Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute in New Zealand opens up faster, more secure internet for Kiwi businesses
Posted 8-May-2019 09:39


Vocus Communications to deliver Microsoft Azure Cloud Solutions through Azure ExpressRoute
Posted 8-May-2019 09:25


Independent NZ feature film #statusPending to premiere during WLG-X
Posted 6-May-2019 22:13


The ultimate dog photoshoot with Nokia 9 PureView #ForgottenDogsofInstagram
Posted 6-May-2019 09:41


Nokia 9 PureView available in New Zealand
Posted 6-May-2019 09:06


Motorola Solutions joins local partners to deliver advanced communications network in New Zealand
Posted 30-Apr-2019 21:50


Micron launches high-performance NVMe SSDs for cloud and enterprise markets
Posted 30-Apr-2019 10:27


Jaguar Land Rover trials in-vehicle smart wallet technology
Posted 29-Apr-2019 21:48



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.