Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
15905 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3130

Trusted

  # 1733269 8-Mar-2017 20:05
Send private message

JimmyH:

 

I think it was inevitable. With the aging population, the costs were climbing sharply and this is one way to soften the hit the government's finances take.

 

Personally, I would rather have the age raised to 67 or 68 and have some confidence that the scheme was affordable and would be there when I eventually need it, that run with a much lower age and risk something more drastic having to be done. Also, I would greatly prefer rasing the age to other options like cutting the rate or a complex and expensive (and potentially avoidable) system of means testing being put in place.

 

Plus, the rising age doesn't mean that you have to wait longer to retire. If you save your pennies then you can retire earlier if you can afford it. I'm trying to arrange my affairs so that it would be feasible for me to retire at 60 if I want to. Irrespective of the super rules. Whether I can manage it is, or course, another question.

 

The rise from 60 to 65 a few years ago didn't seem to be too problematic. I don't see why the increase to 67 should be.

 

 

 

]Or maybe 70, 73, 76??


15905 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3130

Trusted

  # 1733271 8-Mar-2017 20:09
Send private message

MikeB4:
Geektastic:

 

MikeB4:

 

 

 

Geektastic:

 

 

 

BTR:

 

 

 

Personally I like the idea of 65. We already spend most of our lives working why make it even longer? People should be able to enjoy retirement not reach the end of their working life and only have 10 years until they kick the bucket.

 

 

 

The average life expectancy isn't increasing so why increase the retirement age. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You can retire at 35 if you can arrange it. It's not a compulsory retirement age...!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

yep, I retired in my forties.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Although - without intending to be personal - I presume that medical issues may have contributed?

 

 

 

I certainly changed the what and how of my work once I had my heart surgery.

 



You are right, and no you aren't being personal, when I became disabled we decided our financial position was such that I should retire to concentrate on getting better, I also decided it was not fair on my employer as I felt was unable to give them what they deserved.

I draw no benefits and my medical treatment is private even though I am one of those dreadful baby boomers.

 

So this is all your fault. And mine. When I read that form in the womb, I should not have signed up...  :-)


 
 
 
 


14813 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2007


  # 1733275 8-Mar-2017 20:15
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

 

 

Tax everyone, so everyone gets it. Or make it user pays, so everyone is not taxed for super and they provide their own compulsory super, aka KS or other compulsory savings

 

 

 

 

Kiwisaver no doubt will become compulsory once they hit a certain number of signups. It is inevitable. Especially as they removed the kickstart incentive to join, as once it is compulsory there is no incentive needed. I also wouldn't be surprised if they remove the tax credits. They have already halved them.


748 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 184


  # 1733279 8-Mar-2017 20:32
One person supports this post
Send private message

BTR:

Personally I like the idea of 65. We already spend most of our lives working why make it even longer? People should be able to enjoy retirement not reach the end of their working life and only have 10 years until they kick the bucket.



The fundamental problem is that there isn't any choice. Every year delayed makes the problem worse for the following taxpayers. Imagine what the personal tax rates would need to be when we go from eight workers for one on super, to four to one.
I think what I find frustrating is the argument about those paying taxes all their lives deserve it, it's not like that money had been put in a pot for your retirement. I'm fairly certain I will be paying tax all my life too but with less certainty over the availability of superannuation.
Something has to be done.

15905 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3130

Trusted

  # 1733281 8-Mar-2017 20:36
Send private message

mattwnz:

 

tdgeek:

 

 

 

Tax everyone, so everyone gets it. Or make it user pays, so everyone is not taxed for super and they provide their own compulsory super, aka KS or other compulsory savings

 

 

 

 

Kiwisaver no doubt will become compulsory once they hit a certain number of signups. It is inevitable. Especially as they removed the kickstart incentive to join, as once it is compulsory there is no incentive needed. I also wouldn't be surprised if they remove the tax credits. They have already halved them.

 

 

Sam here. Its no different to a home budget, it needs to add up


15905 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3130

Trusted

  # 1733283 8-Mar-2017 20:40
Send private message

mudguard:
BTR:

 

Personally I like the idea of 65. We already spend most of our lives working why make it even longer? People should be able to enjoy retirement not reach the end of their working life and only have 10 years until they kick the bucket.

 



The fundamental problem is that there isn't any choice. Every year delayed makes the problem worse for the following taxpayers. Imagine what the personal tax rates would need to be when we go from eight workers for one on super, to four to one.
I think what I find frustrating is the argument about those paying taxes all their lives deserve it, it's not like that money had been put in a pot for your retirement. I'm fairly certain I will be paying tax all my life too but with less certainty over the availability of superannuation.
Something has to be done.

 

Currently, the taxes paid include expenditure for retirement pensions. Its fine to remove those tax payments and pensions and replace them, but for everyone working at the moment, some of the taxes they have paid include that benefit. They also include medical benefits, but pensions are a tax payment to be received later, whereas many tax payment spends are for today. 


2748 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1326

Lifetime subscriber

  # 1733287 8-Mar-2017 20:54
One person supports this post
Send private message

AFAICT, you've all swallowed the capitalist/progressive line that in some way we have to earn our retirement.

 

One of the great promises of automation was that we would get increased leisure time... instead, we're we're being told that our children will have to work for another 2 years. Why?

 

Because, apparently, we have to pay someone to live. Why do we have to pay? Who gets the benefit of those extra two years of work?

 

We are being treated as a herd of "human resources", to be worked until we drop.

 

 


15905 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3130

Trusted

  # 1733320 8-Mar-2017 21:19
One person supports this post
Send private message

frankv:

 

AFAICT, you've all swallowed the capitalist/progressive line that in some way we have to earn our retirement.

 

One of the great promises of automation was that we would get increased leisure time... instead, we're we're being told that our children will have to work for another 2 years. Why?

 

Because, apparently, we have to pay someone to live. Why do we have to pay? Who gets the benefit of those extra two years of work?

 

We are being treated as a herd of "human resources", to be worked until we drop.

 

 

 

 

Can you clarify middle two paragraphs


14813 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2007


  # 1733394 9-Mar-2017 01:02
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

mudguard:
BTR:

 

Personally I like the idea of 65. We already spend most of our lives working why make it even longer? People should be able to enjoy retirement not reach the end of their working life and only have 10 years until they kick the bucket.

 



The fundamental problem is that there isn't any choice. Every year delayed makes the problem worse for the following taxpayers. Imagine what the personal tax rates would need to be when we go from eight workers for one on super, to four to one.
I think what I find frustrating is the argument about those paying taxes all their lives deserve it, it's not like that money had been put in a pot for your retirement. I'm fairly certain I will be paying tax all my life too but with less certainty over the availability of superannuation.
Something has to be done.

 

Currently, the taxes paid include expenditure for retirement pensions. Its fine to remove those tax payments and pensions and replace them, but for everyone working at the moment, some of the taxes they have paid include that benefit. They also include medical benefits, but pensions are a tax payment to be received later, whereas many tax payment spends are for today. 

 

 

 

 

The question is how much of out tax we are currently paying, is being put aside for our future retirement savings, rather than being spent now. I suspect not too much. This was the whole purpose of the Cullen Super fund, which National stopped paying into. If they had continued, instead of giving tax cuts, we may not have had to need to raise the age in the future. There have been huge increases in shares since national got into power. Infact didn't National actually still say that they don't really see a need to raise the age, but they could see that the public mood on this had changed and wanted it raising. Guess we will see at the next election.




12738 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4245

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1733508 9-Mar-2017 09:33
3 people support this post
Send private message

MikeB4:
Geektastic:

 

MikeB4:

 

 

 

Geektastic:

 

 

 

BTR:

 

 

 

Personally I like the idea of 65. We already spend most of our lives working why make it even longer? People should be able to enjoy retirement not reach the end of their working life and only have 10 years until they kick the bucket.

 

 

 

The average life expectancy isn't increasing so why increase the retirement age. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You can retire at 35 if you can arrange it. It's not a compulsory retirement age...!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

yep, I retired in my forties.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Although - without intending to be personal - I presume that medical issues may have contributed?

 

 

 

I certainly changed the what and how of my work once I had my heart surgery.

 



You are right, and no you aren't being personal, when I became disabled we decided our financial position was such that I should retire to concentrate on getting better, I also decided it was not fair on my employer as I felt was unable to give them what they deserved.

I draw no benefits and my medical treatment is private even though I am one of those dreadful baby boomers.

 

 

 

The whole blame the baby boomers thing is just a symptom of the modern trend to categorise everyone. The suggestion that the BB acted in some way collectively and maliciously is of course utter tripe: they did precisely what any of those complaining about them would do in the same position.








12738 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4245

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1733510 9-Mar-2017 09:37
2 people support this post
Send private message

frankv:

 

AFAICT, you've all swallowed the capitalist/progressive line that in some way we have to earn our retirement.

 

One of the great promises of automation was that we would get increased leisure time... instead, we're we're being told that our children will have to work for another 2 years. Why?

 

Because, apparently, we have to pay someone to live. Why do we have to pay? Who gets the benefit of those extra two years of work?

 

We are being treated as a herd of "human resources", to be worked until we drop.

 

 

 

 

 

 

As I said, you can retire at 35 if you want to and can make it happen.

 

Sadly, many NZers seem to believe 'the government' will deal with all their woes for them (no doubt using other people's money) - as exhibited by the person on RNZ I heard interviewed who claimed that "the government is there to look after you" when in fact the government is the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff and you are responsible for building your own cliff top fence to stop you ending up at the bottom...!






5376 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2201


  # 1733551 9-Mar-2017 10:46
One person supports this post
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

Re the 2040 enactment. I cant get that. The issue is the baby boomers, who are 1/4 of the population. Its not their fault. They didn't sign a form while in the womb!. Its a fact of life, so we need to account for that. But to bring in the change to the retirement age when they are almost gone is a tad strange. Kets start thinking about it now.

 

 

The population is expected to continue to age.  The cost of super and health are expected to balloon significantly around 2030/2040.

 

I'm basing this on projection I have seen several economists present at conferences etc based on treasury long-term forecasts. 

 

An ageing population is one argument in favour of encouraging young skilled migrants.





Mike



12738 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4245

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1733617 9-Mar-2017 12:45
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

tdgeek:

 

Re the 2040 enactment. I cant get that. The issue is the baby boomers, who are 1/4 of the population. Its not their fault. They didn't sign a form while in the womb!. Its a fact of life, so we need to account for that. But to bring in the change to the retirement age when they are almost gone is a tad strange. Kets start thinking about it now.

 

 

The population is expected to continue to age.  The cost of super and health are expected to balloon significantly around 2030/2040.

 

I'm basing this on projection I have seen several economists present at conferences etc based on treasury long-term forecasts. 

 

An ageing population is one argument in favour of encouraging young skilled migrants.

 

 

 

 

"The population is expected to continue to age."

 

 

 

Who knew?






15905 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3130

Trusted

  # 1733621 9-Mar-2017 12:54
Send private message

Geektastic:

 

MikeAqua:

 

tdgeek:

 

Re the 2040 enactment. I cant get that. The issue is the baby boomers, who are 1/4 of the population. Its not their fault. They didn't sign a form while in the womb!. Its a fact of life, so we need to account for that. But to bring in the change to the retirement age when they are almost gone is a tad strange. Kets start thinking about it now.

 

 

The population is expected to continue to age.  The cost of super and health are expected to balloon significantly around 2030/2040.

 

I'm basing this on projection I have seen several economists present at conferences etc based on treasury long-term forecasts. 

 

An ageing population is one argument in favour of encouraging young skilled migrants.

 

 

 

 

"The population is expected to continue to age."

 

 

 

Who knew?

 

 

I just checked the calendar, its true!!

 

What he meant I think was the ratio between the old and young. I would have thought that with people having fewer kids, and later in life, that when the BB's pass, the ratio will come back to a more even spread. There must still be many pre boomers who had heaps of siblings


sxz

670 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 169


  # 1733639 9-Mar-2017 13:15
One person supports this post
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

 

 

Currently, the taxes paid include expenditure for retirement pensions. Its fine to remove those tax payments and pensions and replace them, but for everyone working at the moment, some of the taxes they have paid include that benefit. They also include medical benefits, but pensions are a tax payment to be received later, whereas many tax payment spends are for today. 

 

 

No, no no.  Labour started doing this in 2001(?) with the super fund.  National halted contributions to the super fund.  As far as I am aware no one has ever contributed to future retirement apart from those few years Labour brought it in.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

WLG-X festival to celebrate creativity and innovation
Posted 22-May-2019 17:53


HPE to acquire supercomputing leader Cray
Posted 20-May-2019 11:07


Techweek starting around NZ today
Posted 20-May-2019 09:52


Porirua City Council first to adopt new council software solution Datascape
Posted 15-May-2019 12:00


New survey provides insight into schools' technology challenges and plans
Posted 15-May-2019 09:30


Apple Music now available on Alexa devices in Australia and New Zealand
Posted 15-May-2019 09:11


Make a stand against cyberbullying this Pink Shirt Day
Posted 14-May-2019 20:23


Samsung first TV manufacturer to launch the Apple TV App and Airplay 2
Posted 14-May-2019 20:11


Vodafone New Zealand sold
Posted 14-May-2019 07:25


Kordia boosts cloud performance with locally-hosted Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute
Posted 8-May-2019 10:25


Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute in New Zealand opens up faster, more secure internet for Kiwi businesses
Posted 8-May-2019 09:39


Vocus Communications to deliver Microsoft Azure Cloud Solutions through Azure ExpressRoute
Posted 8-May-2019 09:25


Independent NZ feature film #statusPending to premiere during WLG-X
Posted 6-May-2019 22:13


The ultimate dog photoshoot with Nokia 9 PureView #ForgottenDogsofInstagram
Posted 6-May-2019 09:41


Nokia 9 PureView available in New Zealand
Posted 6-May-2019 09:06



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.