Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

gzt

10872 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1802889 18-Jun-2017 09:51
Send private message

Track of cargo ship. Is the U turn a malfunction or just maintaining manoeuvrability while adjusting arrival time?


8596 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1802893 18-Jun-2017 10:01
Send private message

Warships tend to be painted colours to make them less visible, they probably don't have AIS transponders on at all times, they might not even be displaying lights.

 

Big question perhaps - if this is being reported accurately - is why did the container ship make a 180 deg U turn 20 minutes before the collision, then resume course?

 

The destroyer got a glancing blow - if it had been whacked amidships by the container ship at full-speed, it would have been cut in half.


 
 
 
 


3424 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1802895 18-Jun-2017 10:02
Send private message

gzt: Track of cargo ship. Is the U turn a malfunction or just maintaining manoeuvrability while adjusting arrival time?

 

Guess that's something we'll find out in due course. The ship performed another similar manoeuvre slightly beyond where the track you've posted ends. This track is rapidly disappearing from the website now though.

 


14086 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1802898 18-Jun-2017 10:04
One person supports this post
Send private message

cadman:

Dratsab:


MikeB4: Ok what was the weather? what were their bearings? What were their speeds? What were their mechanical conditions? Who was on the bridges? Like I said virtually zero is known.


How is "virtually zero known" relevant at this stage? What's wrong with discussions which draw in information? Why do you assume it's not common knowledge ships are big and, in the scheme of things, not highly maneuverable? Why don't you like people discussing matters? Why do you constantly want to shut down threads? 



Open discussion and free exchange of thought is the enemy of propaganda.


Oh, and I nearly forgot to roll this out: Kia kaha. My thoughts and prayers are with all those affected by this tragedy.


Now, I better go change my Facebook avatar to whatever some other lemmings have used in order to show my support. I'm sure that helps.



A tad over reaction

Speculation on no verified evidence clouds the truth.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

The is no planet B

 

 


3424 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1802900 18-Jun-2017 10:12
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeB4: Speculation on no verified evidence clouds the truth.

 

Only one person has proffered any speculation so far, and that was after you started up. Mostly, everyone else seems to have a natural curiosity as to what's occurred. Information around the occurrence is starting to get posted, as one would expect. Is there an issue with this?


gzt

10872 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1802901 18-Jun-2017 10:13
Send private message

cadman:

Dratsab:


MikeB4: Ok what was the weather? what were their bearings? What were their speeds? What were their mechanical conditions? Who was on the bridges? Like I said virtually zero is known.


How is "virtually zero known" relevant at this stage? What's wrong with discussions which draw in information? Why do you assume it's not common knowledge ships are big and, in the scheme of things, not highly maneuverable? Why don't you like people discussing matters? Why do you constantly want to shut down threads? 



Open discussion and free exchange of thought is the enemy of propaganda.


Oh, and I nearly forgot to roll this out: Kia kaha. My thoughts and prayers are with all those affected by this tragedy.


Now, I better go change my Facebook avatar to whatever some other lemmings have used in order to show my support. I'm sure that helps.


Some of this strikes me as ad hominim and does not relate to anything said in this topic.

14086 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1802903 18-Jun-2017 10:16
Send private message

Dratsab:

MikeB4: Speculation on no verified evidence clouds the truth.


Only one person has proffered any speculation so far, and that was after you started up. Mostly, everyone else seems to have a natural curiosity as to what's occurred. Information around the occurrence is starting to get posted, as one would expect. Is there an issue with this?



Really? Read again . From the very first post...."Even if the container ship was in the wrong the destroyer should have been able to avoid it I mean come on, going to be some red faces in the Navy over this one."

Before as you put I started up.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

The is no planet B

 

 


 
 
 
 


gzt

10872 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1802904 18-Jun-2017 10:18
Send private message

Dratsab:

gzt: Track of cargo ship. Is the U turn a malfunction or just maintaining manoeuvrability while adjusting arrival time?


Guess that's something we'll find out in due course. The ship performed another similar manoeuvre slightly beyond where the track you've posted ends. This track is rapidly disappearing from the website now though.



The one I posted claims to be the location of the collision.The unusually sharp turn above might be evidence of that. Looks like a full stop and turn

3424 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1802907 18-Jun-2017 10:26
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

Dratsab:

 

MikeB4: Speculation on no verified evidence clouds the truth.

 

Only one person has proffered any speculation so far, and that was after you started up. Mostly, everyone else seems to have a natural curiosity as to what's occurred. Information around the occurrence is starting to get posted, as one would expect. Is there an issue with this? 



Really? Read again . From the very first post...."Even if the container ship was in the wrong the destroyer should have been able to avoid it I mean come on, going to be some red faces in the Navy over this one."

 

That's an opinion as to what should have happened, certainly not speculation over cause. If speculation does run up rigging, the question then becomes "so what"? Speculation is another natural human instinct. It may be off beam but it can also introduce angles of thought other people may not necessarily have had otherwise. It certainly won't "cloud the truth" here as verifiable information will continue to be posted as it comes to light. Speculation at an investigative level can be problematic, but we're exceptionally far removed from that.

 

Back on course...

 

Edit: Mike's quotes added for clarity due to intervening post.


1014 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  # 1802912 18-Jun-2017 10:40
Send private message

gzt:
cadman:

 

Dratsab:

 

 

 

MikeB4: Ok what was the weather? what were their bearings? What were their speeds? What were their mechanical conditions? Who was on the bridges? Like I said virtually zero is known.

 

 

 

How is "virtually zero known" relevant at this stage? What's wrong with discussions which draw in information? Why do you assume it's not common knowledge ships are big and, in the scheme of things, not highly maneuverable? Why don't you like people discussing matters? Why do you constantly want to shut down threads? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Open discussion and free exchange of thought is the enemy of propaganda.

 

 

 

Oh, and I nearly forgot to roll this out: Kia kaha. My thoughts and prayers are with all those affected by this tragedy.

 

 

 

Now, I better go change my Facebook avatar to whatever some other lemmings have used in order to show my support. I'm sure that helps.

 


Some of this strikes me as ad hominim and does not relate to anything said in this topic.

 

It strikes me as simply an expression of an accurate observation of a certain poster's proclivity towards not engaging in the topic at hand and instead posting only to attempt to dissuade others from sharing their independent thoughts.


Stu

Hammered
5284 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1802915 18-Jun-2017 10:53
Send private message

Please stop attacking each other folks. Stick to the topic at hand please, or this will be a rather short discussion. 

 

Cheers and thanks!





Keep calm, and carry on posting.

 

 

 

Click to see full size Click to see full size


14086 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1802916 18-Jun-2017 10:55
Send private message

What always got me when sailing was no matter how fast or slow and tight one turns the area of sea covered is surprisingly large. It is the same when stopping.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

The is no planet B

 

 




1429 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 1802918 18-Jun-2017 10:58
One person supports this post
Send private message

Dratsab:

 

MikeB4:

 

Dratsab:

 

MikeB4: Speculation on no verified evidence clouds the truth.

 

Only one person has proffered any speculation so far, and that was after you started up. Mostly, everyone else seems to have a natural curiosity as to what's occurred. Information around the occurrence is starting to get posted, as one would expect. Is there an issue with this? 



Really? Read again . From the very first post...."Even if the container ship was in the wrong the destroyer should have been able to avoid it I mean come on, going to be some red faces in the Navy over this one."

 

That's an opinion as to what should have happened, certainly not speculation over cause. If speculation does run up rigging, the question then becomes "so what"? Speculation is another natural human instinct. It may be off beam but it can also introduce angles of thought other people may not necessarily have had otherwise. It certainly won't "cloud the truth" here as verifiable information will continue to be posted as it comes to light. Speculation at an investigative level can be problematic, but we're exceptionally far removed from that.

 

Back on course...

 

Edit: Mike's quotes added for clarity due to intervening post.

 

 

yup that was just my opinion , I have spent 20 years at sea and seen a lot of near misses in my life time, You have a destroyer that is bristling with nav and radar tech. I could imagine there was at least 5 if not more people on the bridge of the destroyer but there would have been far less on the cargo ship. Either way I would have thought they could have out maneuvered a cargo ship that's what they do a lot of training for in their war games isn't it ??





Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding : Ice cream man , Ice cream man


Mad Scientist
20757 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1802921 18-Jun-2017 11:35
Send private message

Stu:

 

Please stop attacking each other folks. Stick to the topic at hand please, or this will be a rather short discussion. 

 

Cheers and thanks!

 

 

BAM!





Involuntary autocorrect in operation on mobile device. Apologies in advance.


8807 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 1802944 18-Jun-2017 13:01
Send private message

Fred99:

 

Warships tend to be painted colours to make them less visible, they probably don't have AIS transponders on at all times, they might not even be displaying lights.

 

Big question perhaps - if this is being reported accurately - is why did the container ship make a 180 deg U turn 20 minutes before the collision, then resume course?

 

The destroyer got a glancing blow - if it had been whacked amidships by the container ship at full-speed, it would have been cut in half.

 

 

probably the most accurate post here so far in terms of what the  circumstances would have been like out there

 

Mspec:

 

 

 

yup that was just my opinion , I have spent 20 years at sea and seen a lot of near misses in my life time, You have a destroyer that is bristling with nav and radar tech. I could imagine there was at least 5 if not more people on the bridge of the destroyer but there would have been far less on the cargo ship. Either way I would have thought they could have out maneuvered a cargo ship that's what they do a lot of training for in their war games isn't it ??

 

 

couple of points on that. just because one has radars and nav tech doesn't mean one uses it all the time. the Americans like to roll round with EMCON (Emission Control) restrictions meaning they may have just been listening to others communications and radar signals, rather than transmitting their own. this is common through out navies around the world. maybe not so much in higher traffic zones but common none the less.

 

5 people on the bridge in the middle of the night maybe not, could have been as low as 2, if someone was off doing rounds, or in the toilet a standard bridge watch of 3 or 4 can drop down to 2 etc.

 

given it was a high traffic zone there would have been a lot of different lights out there, and the US ship may not have had its lights on as you sometimes do being a warship. also the colour scheme of war ships mean they tend to be pretty damn hard to see in the day time, let alone at night.

 

manoeuvring has nothing to do with it especially if you dont see something in the first place

 

 


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Amazon Studios announces New Zealand as location for its upcoming series based on The Lord of the Rings
Posted 18-Sep-2019 17:24


The Warehouse chooses Elasticsearch service
Posted 18-Sep-2019 13:55


Voyager upgrades core network to 100Gbit
Posted 18-Sep-2019 13:52


Streaming service Acorn TV launches in New Zealand with selection with British shows
Posted 18-Sep-2019 08:55


Bitcoin.com announces partnership with smartphone manufacturer HTC
Posted 16-Sep-2019 21:30


Finalists Announced for Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 16-Sep-2019 19:37


OPPO Showcases New CameraX Capabilities at Google Developer Days China 2019
Posted 15-Sep-2019 12:42


New Zealand PC Market returns to growth
Posted 15-Sep-2019 12:24


Home sensor charity director speaks about the preventable death which drives her to push for healthy homes
Posted 11-Sep-2019 08:46


Te ao Maori Minecraft world set to inspire Kiwi students
Posted 11-Sep-2019 08:43


Research reveals The Power of Games in New Zealand
Posted 11-Sep-2019 08:40


Ring Door View Cam now available in New Zealand
Posted 11-Sep-2019 08:38


Vodafone NZ to create X Squad
Posted 10-Sep-2019 10:25


Huawei nova 5T to be available 20th September
Posted 5-Sep-2019 11:55


Kogan.com launches prepay challenger brand Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 3-Sep-2019 11:42



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.