Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




549 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 229


Topic # 217893 17-Jul-2017 15:10
Send private message quote this post

This seems to be quite topical at the moment due to Peters astute electioneering.

 

But really, why do we still have these special seats in 2017?

 

Should they not have gone when we ditched the "so-called" undemocratic FPP electoral system?

 

I realise that without the maori seats national would have lost power a couple of times, but is that any reason?


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ... | 15
Departed
10245 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4390

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1823841 17-Jul-2017 15:25
5 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

There will come a time when these are not required, this is not the time. When all the issues have been resolved then the Tangata Whenua can instigate it. If there were to be a referendum it should not be a first past the post,  a 60 to 70% vote in favour of disestablishment should be required. If approved there should be one or two elections before coming in affect.

 

The original reasons for their establishment has passed with universal suffrage but they have a great meaning now.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


564 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 125


  Reply # 1823845 17-Jul-2017 15:30
Send private message quote this post

Isn't Maori representation in Government a treaty issue?

 

And I didn't think it was the "maori seats" that got National to govt rather the Maori Party?

 

 


 
 
 
 


Departed
10245 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4390

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1823865 17-Jul-2017 15:32
Send private message quote this post

sen8or:

 

Isn't Maori representation in Government a treaty issue?

 

And I didn't think it was the "maori seats" that got National to govt rather the Maori Party?

 

 

 

 

 

 

They were originally established due the condition that only property owners could vote. Maori owned property collectively in the 1800s so were not eligible to vote.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2657 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1333

Subscriber

  Reply # 1823872 17-Jul-2017 15:37
9 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

Maori parliamentary seats are one of the most visible symptoms of apartheid in NZ, and should have gone decades ago. If the shoe was on the other foot and there were European or Asian only seats in parliament, everyone and his dog would be decrying it.

 

 





Information wants to be free.
The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.


9239 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2700

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1823874 17-Jul-2017 15:39
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

It doesn't seem appropriate in 2017, certainly.






Departed
10245 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4390

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1823875 17-Jul-2017 15:40
8 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

Lias:

 

Maori parliamentary seats are one of the most visible symptoms of apartheid in NZ, and should have gone decades ago. If the shoe was on the other foot and there were European or Asian only seats in parliament, everyone and his dog would be decrying it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

there is no apartheid in NZ and that is only counter productive inflammatory language. These issues are better dealt with and discussed without that nonsense.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2657 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1333

Subscriber

  Reply # 1823885 17-Jul-2017 15:57
9 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

Lias:

 

Maori parliamentary seats are one of the most visible symptoms of apartheid in NZ, and should have gone decades ago. If the shoe was on the other foot and there were European or Asian only seats in parliament, everyone and his dog would be decrying it.

 

 

 

there is no apartheid in NZ and that is only counter productive inflammatory language. 

 

 

That's your opinion Mike, it's decidedly not mine, nor is it backed up by fact.

 

A couple of the dictionary definitions of apartheid:

 

     

  1. a policy or system of segregation or discrimination on grounds of race
  2. any system or practice that separates people according to color,ethnicity, caste, etc.

 

Any system that separates or segregates Maori from other New Zealand's is by definition, a form of apartheid. Maori seats fit that definition.





Information wants to be free.
The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.


2721 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 967


  Reply # 1823890 17-Jul-2017 16:10
7 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

Maori seats are voluntary - it's voluntary to be on the Maori role and candidates have a choice whether to stand in a Maori or general seat.  That woudl seem to exclude it from the definition of apartheid.

 

I think the seats should stay as long as Maori want them.

 

I'm not Maori at all.

 

 





Mike

351 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 170


  Reply # 1823899 17-Jul-2017 16:25
Send private message quote this post

Pumpedd:

 

 

 

I realise that without the maori seats national would have lost power a couple of times, but is that any reason?

 

 

I dont believe that statement is true.

 

There are still the conservatives which everybody seems to forget (95,598 party votes, 3.97%), but I doubt they will be doing very well in the next election for obvious reasons.

 

Back on topic, Maori seats should be gone. This is not the 1980's.





If you don't read the news, you're uninformed. If you do read it, you're misinformed.

 

  - Denzel Washington


351 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 170


  Reply # 1823909 17-Jul-2017 16:33
Send private message quote this post

Lias:

 

 

 

That's your opinion Mike, it's decidedly not mine, nor is it backed up by fact.

 

A couple of the dictionary definitions of apartheid:

 

     

  1. a policy or system of segregation or discrimination on grounds of race
  2. any system or practice that separates people according to color,ethnicity, caste, etc.

 

Any system that separates or segregates Maori from other New Zealand's is by definition, a form of apartheid. Maori seats fit that definition.

 

 

By that definition South Africa still has "apartheid".





If you don't read the news, you're uninformed. If you do read it, you're misinformed.

 

  - Denzel Washington


8425 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1203

Trusted

  Reply # 1823927 17-Jul-2017 16:41
2 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

sen8or:

 

Isn't Maori representation in Government a treaty issue?

 

And I didn't think it was the "maori seats" that got National to govt rather the Maori Party?

 

 

 

 

 

 

They were originally established due the condition that only property owners could vote. Maori owned property collectively in the 1800s so were not eligible to vote.

 

 

Isn't that a good reason to not now have them?

 

IMO the seats arent being used to help govern NZ, they are used to seek Maori only gains. They used to align with Labour, now they align with National, to help themselves, and National is happy to cater to them as they are easy seats. If Labour/Greens/NZFirst wins, I bet they defect 


Departed
10245 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4390

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1823930 17-Jul-2017 16:53
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

 

MikeB4:

 

sen8or:

 

Isn't Maori representation in Government a treaty issue?

 

And I didn't think it was the "maori seats" that got National to govt rather the Maori Party?

 

 

 

 

 

 

They were originally established due the condition that only property owners could vote. Maori owned property collectively in the 1800s so were not eligible to vote.

 

 

Isn't that a good reason to not now have them?

 

IMO the seats arent being used to help govern NZ, they are used to seek Maori only gains. They used to align with Labour, now they align with National, to help themselves, and National is happy to cater to them as they are easy seats. If Labour/Greens/NZFirst wins, I bet they defect 

 

 

 

 

The original reason has been mitigated now however the need for the seats grew beyond the original, that is to get  representation where it mattered to get wrongs put right and to get the Nations founding document honoured that is still a way off being rectified but good progress is being made.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


16569 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1931

Trusted

  Reply # 1823939 17-Jul-2017 17:17
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

Lias:

 

Maori parliamentary seats are one of the most visible symptoms of apartheid in NZ, and should have gone decades ago. If the shoe was on the other foot and there were European or Asian only seats in parliament, everyone and his dog would be decrying it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

there is no apartheid in NZ and that is only counter productive inflammatory language. These issues are better dealt with and discussed without that nonsense.

 

 

I don't think he knows what apartheid is


16569 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1931

Trusted

  Reply # 1823941 17-Jul-2017 17:21
Send private message quote this post

Lias:

 

MikeB4:

 

Lias:

 

Maori parliamentary seats are one of the most visible symptoms of apartheid in NZ, and should have gone decades ago. If the shoe was on the other foot and there were European or Asian only seats in parliament, everyone and his dog would be decrying it.

 

 

 

there is no apartheid in NZ and that is only counter productive inflammatory language. 

 

 

That's your opinion Mike, it's decidedly not mine, nor is it backed up by fact.

 

A couple of the dictionary definitions of apartheid:

 

     

  1. a policy or system of segregation or discrimination on grounds of race
  2. any system or practice that separates people according to color,ethnicity, caste, etc.

 

Any system that separates or segregates Maori from other New Zealand's is by definition, a form of apartheid. Maori seats fit that definition.

 

 

There needs to be discrimination against. Who is discriminated against, and examples of such policy and system please?

 

You could well be right. But I can't recall any examples of such discrimination. Do you mean when Maori were not allowed to speak Maori in public places? Ah yes I recall now. That could be apartheid, if say they were not allowed to speak Maori in schools leading to impaired education because they could not understand English very well.


9239 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2700

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1823945 17-Jul-2017 17:33
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Wiggum:

 

Lias:

 

 

 

That's your opinion Mike, it's decidedly not mine, nor is it backed up by fact.

 

A couple of the dictionary definitions of apartheid:

 

     

  1. a policy or system of segregation or discrimination on grounds of race
  2. any system or practice that separates people according to color,ethnicity, caste, etc.

 

Any system that separates or segregates Maori from other New Zealand's is by definition, a form of apartheid. Maori seats fit that definition.

 

 

By that definition South Africa still has "apartheid".

 

 


Every Saffer I know will tell you it does.






 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ... | 15
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Nothing nebulous about Microsoft’s cloud-transition
Posted 21-Jul-2017 15:34


We’re spending more on tech, but not as much as Australians
Posted 21-Jul-2017 11:43


Endace announces EndaceFabric for network-wide packet recording
Posted 20-Jul-2017 20:49


Acorn 6: MacOS image editing for the rest of us
Posted 20-Jul-2017 17:04


HTC faces backlash over keyboard pop-up ads
Posted 19-Jul-2017 15:53


BNZ adds Visa credit cards to Android Pay wallet
Posted 18-Jul-2017 19:44


Still living in a Notification hell – Om Malik
Posted 18-Jul-2017 13:00


Duet Display uses iPad to extend Mac, PC
Posted 18-Jul-2017 10:58


PC sales could be worse
Posted 17-Jul-2017 07:34


Crypto-currencies, tulips, market bubbles
Posted 17-Jul-2017 06:38


NZ Tech Podcast: Big batteries, solar cars, cold war, IoT
Posted 16-Jul-2017 16:53


Vodafone Australia mulls Wisp alliance, NZ implications
Posted 13-Jul-2017 16:49


Rural health professionals see fibre pay-off
Posted 13-Jul-2017 11:52


Vodafone announces expansion of $5 Daily Roaming
Posted 13-Jul-2017 10:20


Intel unveils powerful Intel Xeon Scalable processors
Posted 12-Jul-2017 20:41



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.