Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




1077 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 473


Topic # 217893 17-Jul-2017 15:10
Send private message quote this post

This seems to be quite topical at the moment due to Peters astute electioneering.

 

But really, why do we still have these special seats in 2017?

 

Should they not have gone when we ditched the "so-called" undemocratic FPP electoral system?

 

I realise that without the maori seats national would have lost power a couple of times, but is that any reason?


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ... | 22
Onward
11345 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5059

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1823841 17-Jul-2017 15:25
5 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

There will come a time when these are not required, this is not the time. When all the issues have been resolved then the Tangata Whenua can instigate it. If there were to be a referendum it should not be a first past the post,  a 60 to 70% vote in favour of disestablishment should be required. If approved there should be one or two elections before coming in affect.

 

The original reasons for their establishment has passed with universal suffrage but they have a great meaning now.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


662 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 176


  Reply # 1823845 17-Jul-2017 15:30
Send private message quote this post

Isn't Maori representation in Government a treaty issue?

 

And I didn't think it was the "maori seats" that got National to govt rather the Maori Party?

 

 


 
 
 
 


Onward
11345 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5059

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1823865 17-Jul-2017 15:32
Send private message quote this post

sen8or:

 

Isn't Maori representation in Government a treaty issue?

 

And I didn't think it was the "maori seats" that got National to govt rather the Maori Party?

 

 

 

 

 

 

They were originally established due the condition that only property owners could vote. Maori owned property collectively in the 1800s so were not eligible to vote.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2813 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1463

Subscriber

  Reply # 1823872 17-Jul-2017 15:37
9 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

Maori parliamentary seats are one of the most visible symptoms of apartheid in NZ, and should have gone decades ago. If the shoe was on the other foot and there were European or Asian only seats in parliament, everyone and his dog would be decrying it.

 

 





Information wants to be free. The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

 

Thinking about signing up to BigPipe? Get $20 credit with my referral link.


9929 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3026

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1823874 17-Jul-2017 15:39
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

It doesn't seem appropriate in 2017, certainly.






Onward
11345 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5059

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1823875 17-Jul-2017 15:40
8 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

Lias:

 

Maori parliamentary seats are one of the most visible symptoms of apartheid in NZ, and should have gone decades ago. If the shoe was on the other foot and there were European or Asian only seats in parliament, everyone and his dog would be decrying it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

there is no apartheid in NZ and that is only counter productive inflammatory language. These issues are better dealt with and discussed without that nonsense.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2813 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1463

Subscriber

  Reply # 1823885 17-Jul-2017 15:57
9 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

Lias:

 

Maori parliamentary seats are one of the most visible symptoms of apartheid in NZ, and should have gone decades ago. If the shoe was on the other foot and there were European or Asian only seats in parliament, everyone and his dog would be decrying it.

 

 

 

there is no apartheid in NZ and that is only counter productive inflammatory language. 

 

 

That's your opinion Mike, it's decidedly not mine, nor is it backed up by fact.

 

A couple of the dictionary definitions of apartheid:

 

     

  1. a policy or system of segregation or discrimination on grounds of race
  2. any system or practice that separates people according to color,ethnicity, caste, etc.

 

Any system that separates or segregates Maori from other New Zealand's is by definition, a form of apartheid. Maori seats fit that definition.





Information wants to be free. The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

 

Thinking about signing up to BigPipe? Get $20 credit with my referral link.


3135 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1167


  Reply # 1823890 17-Jul-2017 16:10
7 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

Maori seats are voluntary - it's voluntary to be on the Maori role and candidates have a choice whether to stand in a Maori or general seat.  That woudl seem to exclude it from the definition of apartheid.

 

I think the seats should stay as long as Maori want them.

 

I'm not Maori at all.

 

 





Mike

957 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 363


  Reply # 1823899 17-Jul-2017 16:25
Send private message quote this post

Pumpedd:

 

 

 

I realise that without the maori seats national would have lost power a couple of times, but is that any reason?

 

 

I dont believe that statement is true.

 

There are still the conservatives which everybody seems to forget (95,598 party votes, 3.97%), but I doubt they will be doing very well in the next election for obvious reasons.

 

Back on topic, Maori seats should be gone. This is not the 1980's.


957 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 363


  Reply # 1823909 17-Jul-2017 16:33
Send private message quote this post

Lias:

 

 

 

That's your opinion Mike, it's decidedly not mine, nor is it backed up by fact.

 

A couple of the dictionary definitions of apartheid:

 

     

  1. a policy or system of segregation or discrimination on grounds of race
  2. any system or practice that separates people according to color,ethnicity, caste, etc.

 

Any system that separates or segregates Maori from other New Zealand's is by definition, a form of apartheid. Maori seats fit that definition.

 

 

By that definition South Africa still has "apartheid".


10033 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1582

Trusted

  Reply # 1823927 17-Jul-2017 16:41
2 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

sen8or:

 

Isn't Maori representation in Government a treaty issue?

 

And I didn't think it was the "maori seats" that got National to govt rather the Maori Party?

 

 

 

 

 

 

They were originally established due the condition that only property owners could vote. Maori owned property collectively in the 1800s so were not eligible to vote.

 

 

Isn't that a good reason to not now have them?

 

IMO the seats arent being used to help govern NZ, they are used to seek Maori only gains. They used to align with Labour, now they align with National, to help themselves, and National is happy to cater to them as they are easy seats. If Labour/Greens/NZFirst wins, I bet they defect 


Onward
11345 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5059

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1823930 17-Jul-2017 16:53
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

 

MikeB4:

 

sen8or:

 

Isn't Maori representation in Government a treaty issue?

 

And I didn't think it was the "maori seats" that got National to govt rather the Maori Party?

 

 

 

 

 

 

They were originally established due the condition that only property owners could vote. Maori owned property collectively in the 1800s so were not eligible to vote.

 

 

Isn't that a good reason to not now have them?

 

IMO the seats arent being used to help govern NZ, they are used to seek Maori only gains. They used to align with Labour, now they align with National, to help themselves, and National is happy to cater to them as they are easy seats. If Labour/Greens/NZFirst wins, I bet they defect 

 

 

 

 

The original reason has been mitigated now however the need for the seats grew beyond the original, that is to get  representation where it mattered to get wrongs put right and to get the Nations founding document honoured that is still a way off being rectified but good progress is being made.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


17474 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2118

Trusted

  Reply # 1823939 17-Jul-2017 17:17
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

Lias:

 

Maori parliamentary seats are one of the most visible symptoms of apartheid in NZ, and should have gone decades ago. If the shoe was on the other foot and there were European or Asian only seats in parliament, everyone and his dog would be decrying it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

there is no apartheid in NZ and that is only counter productive inflammatory language. These issues are better dealt with and discussed without that nonsense.

 

 

I don't think he knows what apartheid is


17474 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2118

Trusted

  Reply # 1823941 17-Jul-2017 17:21
Send private message quote this post

Lias:

 

MikeB4:

 

Lias:

 

Maori parliamentary seats are one of the most visible symptoms of apartheid in NZ, and should have gone decades ago. If the shoe was on the other foot and there were European or Asian only seats in parliament, everyone and his dog would be decrying it.

 

 

 

there is no apartheid in NZ and that is only counter productive inflammatory language. 

 

 

That's your opinion Mike, it's decidedly not mine, nor is it backed up by fact.

 

A couple of the dictionary definitions of apartheid:

 

     

  1. a policy or system of segregation or discrimination on grounds of race
  2. any system or practice that separates people according to color,ethnicity, caste, etc.

 

Any system that separates or segregates Maori from other New Zealand's is by definition, a form of apartheid. Maori seats fit that definition.

 

 

There needs to be discrimination against. Who is discriminated against, and examples of such policy and system please?

 

You could well be right. But I can't recall any examples of such discrimination. Do you mean when Maori were not allowed to speak Maori in public places? Ah yes I recall now. That could be apartheid, if say they were not allowed to speak Maori in schools leading to impaired education because they could not understand English very well.


9929 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3026

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1823945 17-Jul-2017 17:33
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Wiggum:

 

Lias:

 

 

 

That's your opinion Mike, it's decidedly not mine, nor is it backed up by fact.

 

A couple of the dictionary definitions of apartheid:

 

     

  1. a policy or system of segregation or discrimination on grounds of race
  2. any system or practice that separates people according to color,ethnicity, caste, etc.

 

Any system that separates or segregates Maori from other New Zealand's is by definition, a form of apartheid. Maori seats fit that definition.

 

 

By that definition South Africa still has "apartheid".

 

 


Every Saffer I know will tell you it does.






 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ... | 22
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Air New Zealand experiments with blockchain technology
Posted 23-Nov-2017 15:39


Symantec selects Amazon Web Services to deliver cloud security
Posted 23-Nov-2017 10:40


New Zealand Ministry of Education chooses Unisys for cloud-based education resourcing management system
Posted 22-Nov-2017 22:00


Business analytics software powers profits for NZ wine producers
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:52


Pyrios strikes up alliance with Microsoft integrator UC Logiq
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:51


The New Zealand IT services ecosystem - it's all digital down here
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:49


Volvo to supply tens of thousands of autonomous drive compatible cars to Uber
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:46


From small to medium and beyond: Navigating the ERP battlefield
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:12


Business owners: ERP software selection starts (and finishes) with you
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:11


Why I'm not an early adopter
Posted 21-Nov-2017 10:39


Netatmo launches smart home products in New Zealand
Posted 20-Nov-2017 20:06


Huawei Mate 10: Punchy, long battery life, artificial intelligence
Posted 20-Nov-2017 16:30


Propel launch Disney Star Wars Laser Battle Drones
Posted 19-Nov-2017 21:26


UFB killer app: Speed
Posted 17-Nov-2017 17:01


The case for RSS — MacSparky
Posted 13-Nov-2017 14:35



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.