Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
118 posts

Master Geek


  # 1892351 30-Oct-2017 06:37
2 people support this post
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

You have to be joking or are unaware of climate change, what it does, and when we reach the threshold when it runs amok, and any money or resources we throw at it are too late. 

 

 

You're funny, but I'm not joking.

 

I've been studying climate change science for 25 years, and I'm an expert in economic modelling. I know more about the impacts of climate change than most people.

 

Climate change is a problem, but so are many other things. My concern is that the focus on climate change is crowding out efforts to address larger and more immediate problems.

 

You could spend thousands of dollars to put solar panels on your roof. Doing that will have virtually no impact on climate change, and in most cases will likely be more expensive than continuing to receive electricity from the grid. Or you could make a real difference by donating the money to a charity that installs solar panels in poor villages. That will give them reliable electricity and reduce the substantial negative health impacts that result from burning wood and kerosene.


18307 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1892378 30-Oct-2017 07:09
Send private message

Ouranos:

 

tdgeek:

 

You have to be joking or are unaware of climate change, what it does, and when we reach the threshold when it runs amok, and any money or resources we throw at it are too late. 

 

 

You're funny, but I'm not joking.

 

I've been studying climate change science for 25 years, and I'm an expert in economic modelling. I know more about the impacts of climate change than most people.

 

Climate change is a problem, but so are many other things. My concern is that the focus on climate change is crowding out efforts to address larger and more immediate problems.

 

You could spend thousands of dollars to put solar panels on your roof. Doing that will have virtually no impact on climate change, and in most cases will likely be more expensive than continuing to receive electricity from the grid. Or you could make a real difference by donating the money to a charity that installs solar panels in poor villages. That will give them reliable electricity and reduce the substantial negative health impacts that result from burning wood and kerosene.

 

 

So climate change isn't that important right now, we can fix it some other time. The runaway effect of climate change when it passes the tipping point doesn't care about human economics


 
 
 
 


1759 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  # 1892390 30-Oct-2017 08:08
Send private message

New Zealand could quadruple our emissions and the effect on global change wouldnt be measurable. You know it has to be a global solution where ALL are doing their part. Anything we do here is irrelevant, so lets not screw our exporters before we need to. A technological solution will come and I am sure mass food producers like NZ will end up with some sort of global exemption (within reason) as the world does need to eat. 

 

Global population increase is perhaps the largest contributor to it anyways. Lets steralise the poor so they cannot procreate. Now that China doesnt have a one child law, watch it grow.

 

Maybe NZ has the solution...nuke 30% of the population.

 

Labour will fix it..thats a certainity.


2997 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 1892404 30-Oct-2017 09:07
2 people support this post
Send private message

Pumpedd:

 

New Zealand could quadruple our emissions and the effect on global change wouldnt be measurable.

 

 

 

 

It is not ethical to make money with the deliberate disregard for the consequences. Arguments like "Others are doing worse" or "We are insignificant" are irrelevant.

 

If we need to pollute the planet (whether it's our own rivers, or the atmosphere with excess methane and carbon dioxide) in order to make goods to sell, then we are providing goods to those other countries below cost. To put it another way, we are subsidising them in that *we* pay for the pollution, either with a worsened lifestyle (unable to swim in our dirty rivers) or we pay the actual cost of cleaning them up. That's no way to run a country (or a business).

 

 




1227 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1892905 31-Oct-2017 08:07
2 people support this post
Send private message

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-41778089

 

From the above article:

 

Concentrations of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere surged to a record high in 2016, according to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO).

 

Last year's increase was 50% higher than the average of the past 10 years.

 

Researchers say a combination of human activities and the El Niño weather phenomenon drove CO2 to a level not seen in 800,000 years.

 

Scientists say this risks making global temperature targets largely unattainable.

 

Emissions from human sources have slowed down in the last couple of years according to research, but according to Dr Tarasova, it is the cumulative total in the atmosphere that really matters as CO2 stays aloft and active for centuries.

 

The fact that CO2 is now at a level not seen in 800,000 years is a disturbing fact.


18307 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1892913 31-Oct-2017 08:21
Send private message

frednz:

 

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-41778089

 

From the above article:

 

Concentrations of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere surged to a record high in 2016, according to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO).

 

Last year's increase was 50% higher than the average of the past 10 years.

 

Researchers say a combination of human activities and the El Niño weather phenomenon drove CO2 to a level not seen in 800,000 years.

 

Scientists say this risks making global temperature targets largely unattainable.

 

Emissions from human sources have slowed down in the last couple of years according to research, but according to Dr Tarasova, it is the cumulative total in the atmosphere that really matters as CO2 stays aloft and active for centuries.

 

The fact that CO2 is now at a level not seen in 800,000 years is a disturbing fact.

 

 

It is. While many people are concerned, scientists are concerned, the ones that can take action, leaders of nations are not concerned. Thats why nothing happens except for token gestures




1227 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1895984 6-Nov-2017 13:31
Send private message

https://science2017.globalchange.gov/

 

The above link is to a major new 477-page US report about our globally changing climate.

 

It's not good news for people who think climate change is a hoax.

 

Here's one short extract from the report:

 

The global atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration has now passed 400 parts per million (ppm), a level that last occurred about 3 million years ago, when both global average temperature and sea level were significantly higher than today. Continued growth in CO2 emissions over this century and beyond would lead to an atmospheric concentration not experienced in tens to hundreds of millions of years. There is broad consensus that the further and the faster the Earth system is pushed towards warming, the greater the risk of unanticipated changes and impacts, some of which are potentially large and irreversible.

 

 


 
 
 
 


774 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  # 1896011 6-Nov-2017 13:52
Send private message

frednz:

 

https://science2017.globalchange.gov/

 

The above link is to a major new 477-page US report about our globally changing climate.

 

It's not good news for people who think climate change is a hoax.

 

Here's one short extract from the report:

 

The global atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration has now passed 400 parts per million (ppm), a level that last occurred about 3 million years ago, when both global average temperature and sea level were significantly higher than today. Continued growth in CO2 emissions over this century and beyond would lead to an atmospheric concentration not experienced in tens to hundreds of millions of years. There is broad consensus that the further and the faster the Earth system is pushed towards warming, the greater the risk of unanticipated changes and impacts, some of which are potentially large and irreversible.

 

 

 

 

Corollary:

 

Despite mankind's collective efforts to increase CO2 output and generate a warmer climate, we have yet to come significantly close to levels previously achieved by nature without any anthropogenic assistance whatsoever.

 

 

 

Now...   Fight! ;-)




1227 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1896216 6-Nov-2017 16:47
Send private message

6FIEND:

 

frednz:

 

https://science2017.globalchange.gov/

 

The above link is to a major new 477-page US report about our globally changing climate.

 

It's not good news for people who think climate change is a hoax.

 

Here's one short extract from the report:

 

The global atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration has now passed 400 parts per million (ppm), a level that last occurred about 3 million years ago, when both global average temperature and sea level were significantly higher than today. Continued growth in CO2 emissions over this century and beyond would lead to an atmospheric concentration not experienced in tens to hundreds of millions of years. There is broad consensus that the further and the faster the Earth system is pushed towards warming, the greater the risk of unanticipated changes and impacts, some of which are potentially large and irreversible.

 

 

 

 

Corollary:

 

Despite mankind's collective efforts to increase CO2 output and generate a warmer climate, we have yet to come significantly close to levels previously achieved by nature without any anthropogenic assistance whatsoever.

 

 

 

Now...   Fight! ;-)

 

 

https://www.livescience.com/1293-earth-survive-global-warming.html

 

Quote from above article:

 

“What we need to be thinking of as humans causing changes to the Earth system is what the consequences will be to us human beings,” said Edwards, the USC geo-microbiologist. “The Earth could care less. We will be recorded as a minor perturbation in the Earth system. The Earth will go on. The question is: Will we?”

 

Now, isn't that a fairly important point, if we continue to pour CO2 into the atmosphere at present rates, how much longer can humans and other life forms survive?

 

Now here's a summary of what you can do to help fight against global warming:

 

https://www.livescience.com/1289-fight-global-warming.html


5385 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1896266 6-Nov-2017 17:34
Send private message

At the weekend I didn't go fishing because the weather was rubbish.  So that saved about 80L of petrol and 1.6L of two-stroke oil ... for a while.





Mike

5385 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1896270 6-Nov-2017 17:41
Send private message

frednz:

 

 

 

“What we need to be thinking of as humans causing changes to the Earth system is what the consequences will be to us human beings,” said Edwards, the USC geo-microbiologist. “The Earth could care less. We will be recorded as a minor perturbation in the Earth system. The Earth will go on. The question is: Will we?”

 

 

^^^ this. Climate change is actually a humanitarian issue.  The impact will be on people. 

 

From a deep environmental perspective, the earth will recover, when we have substantially wiped ourselves out.

 

But I have to say: I object to the use of the term 'could care less' to men 'couldn't care less'.  That's the real tragedy here.

 

 





Mike

2997 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 1896320 6-Nov-2017 19:17
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

From a deep environmental perspective, the earth will recover, when we have substantially wiped ourselves out.

 

 

"Recover" ??? That's a very anthropocentric way of looking at it.

 

The Earth will continue to exist, in some form or other, whether we're here or not. We're not substantially changing the Earth, except for the 10-mile thick skin that we need to exist.

 

 


Lock him up!
10795 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 1896333 6-Nov-2017 20:24
2 people support this post
Send private message

6FIEND:

 

Despite mankind's collective efforts to increase CO2 output and generate a warmer climate, we have yet to come significantly close to levels previously achieved by nature without any anthropogenic assistance whatsoever.

 

 

 

 

Those levels previously achieved by nature probably would have come very close to wiping out the dinosaurs if the asteroid hadn't done it first. Just because we haven't yet managed to do what nature has done, is not a reason to keep trying.

 

 





I don't think there is ever a bad time to talk about how absurd war is, how old men make decisions and young people die. - George Clooney
 


18307 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1896337 6-Nov-2017 20:32
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

6FIEND:

 

Despite mankind's collective efforts to increase CO2 output and generate a warmer climate, we have yet to come significantly close to levels previously achieved by nature without any anthropogenic assistance whatsoever.

 

 

 

 

Those levels previously achieved by nature probably would have come very close to wiping out the dinosaurs if the asteroid hadn't done it first. Just because we haven't yet managed to do what nature has done, is not a reason to keep trying.

 

 

 

 

I am a doco freak. There was a time when Earth was fully covered in ice. 99.9 % of photons were reflected back. It eventually recovered. Same with heat. The issue is this takes millions of years, our presence is a speck of a speck in time. Who cares if the earth gains 10 degrees of average temp? The Earth doesn't, it will cycle over millions of years. But if that happened now, we will be history in 50 years.


5385 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1896576 7-Nov-2017 09:11
One person supports this post
Send private message

frankv:

 

MikeAqua:

 

From a deep environmental perspective, the earth will recover, when we have substantially wiped ourselves out.

 

 

"Recover" ??? That's a very anthropocentric way of looking at it.

 

The Earth will continue to exist, in some form or other, whether we're here or not. We're not substantially changing the Earth, except for the 10-mile thick skin that we need to exist.

 

 

 

What I was attempting to say (as simply as possible) is that the biosphere as a whole is dynamically stable. It reacts to perturbations via adaptation of organisms and ultimately recovers objective measures of innate ecosystem health like diversity, biomass, abundance and trophic flow.  It settles on a new equilibrium that is functionally the same but at a species level may be different.

 

This is what the fossil record shows to have happened after previous mass extinctions.  From time to time the planetary conditions regulate the biosphere (e.g. snowball earth).  Most of the time the biosphere (including humans) regulates planetary conditions - e.g. climate change.

 

A planet-scale example of recovery is the carboniferous period (after the Late Devonian Extinction event).  A micro-scale example is Chernobyl.

 

It would take a solar-system scale perturbation to stop the biosphere from recovering.

 

 





Mike

1 | ... | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Microsoft launches first Experience Center worldwide for Asia Pacific in Singapore
Posted 13-Nov-2019 13:08


Disney+ comes to LG Smart TVs
Posted 13-Nov-2019 12:55


Spark launches new wireless broadband "Unplan Metro"
Posted 11-Nov-2019 08:19


Malwarebytes overhauls flagship product with new UI, faster engine and lighter footprint
Posted 6-Nov-2019 11:48


CarbonClick launches into Digital Marketplaces
Posted 6-Nov-2019 11:42


Kordia offers Microsoft Azure Peering Service
Posted 6-Nov-2019 11:41


Spark 5G live on Auckland Harbour for Emirates Team New Zealand
Posted 4-Nov-2019 17:30


BNZ and Vodafone partner to boost NZ Tech for SME
Posted 31-Oct-2019 17:14


Nokia 7.2 available in New Zealand
Posted 31-Oct-2019 16:24


2talk launches Microsoft Teams Direct Routing product
Posted 29-Oct-2019 10:35


New Breast Cancer Foundation app puts power in Kiwi women's hands
Posted 25-Oct-2019 16:13


OPPO Reno2 Series lands, alongside hybrid noise-cancelling Wireless Headphones
Posted 24-Oct-2019 15:32


Waikato Data Scientists awarded $13 million from the Government
Posted 24-Oct-2019 15:27


D-Link launches Wave 2 Unified Access Points
Posted 24-Oct-2019 15:07


LG Electronics begins distributing the G8X THINQ
Posted 24-Oct-2019 10:58



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.