Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


BTR



1522 posts

Uber Geek


# 222441 11-Aug-2017 09:06
One person supports this post
Send private message

Long story short my employer is reviewing my departments salaries at our request. They have said they would approach other businesses in the sector to get an idea of what others are paying their staff.

 

 

 

Now one of my staff went and did the same thing using their contacts but I have been told they shouldn't have done that and left it up to management "as it makes things more difficult now"

 

 

 

Is it just me of does this sound like a complete load of rubbish? What is wrong with people doing their own research into salaries provided they are doing it professionally using contacts they have in the same field?


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
4160 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 1844946 11-Aug-2017 09:12
11 people support this post
Send private message

Information is power. Why should only one side have the information? Unless they have something to hide.




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

4469 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1844951 11-Aug-2017 09:15
2 people support this post
Send private message

Dingbatt: Information is power. Why should only one side have the information? Unless they have something to hide.

 

 

 

I don't see the point.  If one is unhappy with the management findings then quit. 


 
 
 
 


13732 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1844954 11-Aug-2017 09:17
7 people support this post
Send private message

Sounds like a tactical error.

 

 

 

Wait for management to produce results THEN provide data to challenge.






2523 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 1844955 11-Aug-2017 09:18
2 people support this post
Send private message

My initial thought is management are scared of losing key staff?

 

 


6615 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  # 1844958 11-Aug-2017 09:21
Send private message

Information is power as stated above but maybe in this case they don't want to be comparing different roles with the same expectation.


6057 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1844959 11-Aug-2017 09:21
6 people support this post
Send private message

No-one has a right to define what someone talks to an industry peer about, so long as it's not against a policy agreed by the employee.  Management is naive if they think their people aren't doing their own research.  They also don't need to go out to other business to see what they're paying, when there are independent reports across industries that do just that.


4469 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1844960 11-Aug-2017 09:22
One person supports this post
Send private message

kryptonjohn:

 

My initial thought is management are scared of losing key staff?

 

 

 

 

Why would staff leave before knowing the outcome of the salary investigation? It seems presumptious, and multiple salary investigations probably do not help.

 

My view is let management release their findings, then, object if you disagree.   And, if no agreement can be reached then quit and get the job with the higher salary. 


 
 
 
 


6057 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1844961 11-Aug-2017 09:23
3 people support this post
Send private message

surfisup1000:

 

 

 

Why would staff leave before knowing the outcome of the salary investigation?

 

 

Because job security and satisfaction isn't just about salary, and the way such things are handled by management can be a key indicator for whether the company is worth working for.  


176 posts

Master Geek


  # 1844963 11-Aug-2017 09:24
3 people support this post
Send private message

It's in management's interest to keep salaries down

 

It's in your interest to get a fair salary. 

 

Even better would be if you could point to a relatively independent source of information about salaries that you could agree on rather than each doing your own research. At least then there could be no accusations of bias. 

 

 


6615 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  # 1844967 11-Aug-2017 09:29
Send private message

evnafets:

 

It's in management's interest to keep salaries down

 

It's in your interest to get a fair salary. 

 

Even better would be if you could point to a relatively independent source of information about salaries that you could agree on rather than each doing your own research. At least then there could be no accusations of bias. 

 

 

 



"It's in management's interest to keep salaries down" And they wonder why no one wants to be at work, has no commitment to the company and there are high staff churn rates. Invest in your staff and they will invest in you. Anyway the employers that dont invest in their staff just end up costing themselves more money in training, time, HR and they don't develop employees skills in their field.
 
I've been undervalued plenty of times and it only cost that company not myself, If your in a position like that just move on. 


BTR



1522 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1844977 11-Aug-2017 09:35
4 people support this post
Send private message

I have a feeling that management are wanting to get the lowest figure possible and someone doing their own research and coming back with legitimate higher figures puts a spanner in their plan. 

 

 

 

 


14575 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1844978 11-Aug-2017 09:35
2 people support this post
Send private message

Coil:

 

evnafets:

 

It's in management's interest to keep salaries down

 

It's in your interest to get a fair salary. 

 

Even better would be if you could point to a relatively independent source of information about salaries that you could agree on rather than each doing your own research. At least then there could be no accusations of bias. 

 

 

 



"It's in management's interest to keep salaries down" And they wonder why no one wants to be at work, has no commitment to the company and there are high staff churn rates. Invest in your staff and they will invest in you. Anyway the employers that dont invest in their staff just end up costing themselves more money in training, time, HR and they don't develop employees skills in their field.
 
I've been undervalued plenty of times and it only cost that company not myself, If your in a position like that just move on. 

 

 

 

 

Not always, I was in the habit of researching industry pay scales usually on a yearly basis. I  held the belief that I must pay industry standards or better in order to....

 

Maintain staff morale.

 

Staff retention.

 

Being able to hire the right people.

 

Paying more often costs you less.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

There is no planet B

 

 


1480 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1844994 11-Aug-2017 09:53
Send private message

surfisup1000:

 

kryptonjohn:

 

My initial thought is management are scared of losing key staff?

 

 

 

 

Why would staff leave before knowing the outcome of the salary investigation? It seems presumptious, and multiple salary investigations probably do not help.

 

My view is let management release their findings, then, object if you disagree.   And, if no agreement can be reached then quit and get the job with the higher salary. 

 

 

How are you going to know if you disagree without doing some research?


2547 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1844998 11-Aug-2017 10:02
3 people support this post
Send private message

 

It's in management's interest to keep salaries down

 

 

Not in mine. I'm more interested in people performing well. Of course, that doesn't mean we can afford to pay over-inflated salaries, but if you underpay you typically get either get low morale, resentment, poor staff retention or disengagement. It's usually much better for the business to have an engaged, highly-productive worker on $90k than a disengaged, low-productive person in the same role on $70k.


4469 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1845009 11-Aug-2017 10:10
Send private message

BlueShift:

 

surfisup1000:

 

kryptonjohn:

 

My initial thought is management are scared of losing key staff?

 

 

 

 

Why would staff leave before knowing the outcome of the salary investigation? It seems presumptious, and multiple salary investigations probably do not help.

 

My view is let management release their findings, then, object if you disagree.   And, if no agreement can be reached then quit and get the job with the higher salary. 

 

 

How are you going to know if you disagree without doing some research?

 

 

Sure, do some research, but keep it to oneself to use as ammunition after management release their findings.   If necessary. 


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Vodafone integrates eSIM into device and wearable roadmap
Posted 17-Jan-2020 09:45


Do you need this camera app? Group investigates privacy implications
Posted 16-Jan-2020 03:30


JBL launches headphones range designed for gaming
Posted 13-Jan-2020 09:59


Withings introduces ScanWatch wearable combining ECG and sleep apnea detection
Posted 9-Jan-2020 18:34


NZ Police releases public app
Posted 8-Jan-2020 11:43


Suunto 7 combine sports and smart features on new smartwatch generation
Posted 7-Jan-2020 16:06


Intel brings innovation with technology spanning the cloud, network, edge and PC
Posted 7-Jan-2020 15:54


AMD announces high performance desktop and ultrathin laptop processors
Posted 7-Jan-2020 15:42


AMD unveils four new desktop and mobile GPUs including AMD Radeon RX 5600
Posted 7-Jan-2020 15:32


Consolidation in video streaming market with Spark selling Lightbox to Sky
Posted 19-Dec-2019 09:09


Intel introduces cryogenic control chip to enable quantum computers
Posted 10-Dec-2019 21:32


Vodafone 5G service live in four cities
Posted 10-Dec-2019 08:30


Samsung Galaxy Fold now available in New Zealand
Posted 6-Dec-2019 00:01


NZ company oDocs awarded US$ 100,000 Dubai World Expo grant
Posted 5-Dec-2019 16:00


New Zealand Rugby Selects AWS-Powered Analytics for Deeper Game Insights
Posted 5-Dec-2019 11:33



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.