Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


BTR



1300 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 338

Subscriber

Topic # 222441 11-Aug-2017 09:06
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Long story short my employer is reviewing my departments salaries at our request. They have said they would approach other businesses in the sector to get an idea of what others are paying their staff.

 

 

 

Now one of my staff went and did the same thing using their contacts but I have been told they shouldn't have done that and left it up to management "as it makes things more difficult now"

 

 

 

Is it just me of does this sound like a complete load of rubbish? What is wrong with people doing their own research into salaries provided they are doing it professionally using contacts they have in the same field?


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
2919 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 392

Subscriber

  Reply # 1844946 11-Aug-2017 09:12
11 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

Information is power. Why should only one side have the information? Unless they have something to hide.




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

3133 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 850


  Reply # 1844951 11-Aug-2017 09:15
2 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

Dingbatt: Information is power. Why should only one side have the information? Unless they have something to hide.

 

 

 

I don't see the point.  If one is unhappy with the management findings then quit. 


 
 
 
 


9375 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2827

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1844954 11-Aug-2017 09:17
7 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

Sounds like a tactical error.

 

 

 

Wait for management to produce results THEN provide data to challenge.






549 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 155

Subscriber

  Reply # 1844955 11-Aug-2017 09:18
2 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

My initial thought is management are scared of losing key staff?

 

 


4981 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1391

Trusted

  Reply # 1844958 11-Aug-2017 09:21
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Information is power as stated above but maybe in this case they don't want to be comparing different roles with the same expectation.






4009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 554

Moderator
Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1844959 11-Aug-2017 09:21
6 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

No-one has a right to define what someone talks to an industry peer about, so long as it's not against a policy agreed by the employee.  Management is naive if they think their people aren't doing their own research.  They also don't need to go out to other business to see what they're paying, when there are independent reports across industries that do just that.


3133 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 850


  Reply # 1844960 11-Aug-2017 09:22
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

kryptonjohn:

 

My initial thought is management are scared of losing key staff?

 

 

 

 

Why would staff leave before knowing the outcome of the salary investigation? It seems presumptious, and multiple salary investigations probably do not help.

 

My view is let management release their findings, then, object if you disagree.   And, if no agreement can be reached then quit and get the job with the higher salary. 


4009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 554

Moderator
Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1844961 11-Aug-2017 09:23
3 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

surfisup1000:

 

 

 

Why would staff leave before knowing the outcome of the salary investigation?

 

 

Because job security and satisfaction isn't just about salary, and the way such things are handled by management can be a key indicator for whether the company is worth working for.  


68 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 23


  Reply # 1844963 11-Aug-2017 09:24
3 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

It's in management's interest to keep salaries down

 

It's in your interest to get a fair salary. 

 

Even better would be if you could point to a relatively independent source of information about salaries that you could agree on rather than each doing your own research. At least then there could be no accusations of bias. 

 

 


4981 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1391

Trusted

  Reply # 1844967 11-Aug-2017 09:29
5 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

evnafets:

 

It's in management's interest to keep salaries down

 

It's in your interest to get a fair salary. 

 

Even better would be if you could point to a relatively independent source of information about salaries that you could agree on rather than each doing your own research. At least then there could be no accusations of bias. 

 

 

 



"It's in management's interest to keep salaries down" And they wonder why no one wants to be at work, has no commitment to the company and there are high staff churn rates. Invest in your staff and they will invest in you. Anyway the employers that dont invest in their staff just end up costing themselves more money in training, time, HR and they don't develop employees skills in their field.
 
I've been undervalued plenty of times and it only cost that company not myself, If your in a position like that just move on. 






BTR



1300 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 338

Subscriber

  Reply # 1844977 11-Aug-2017 09:35
4 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

I have a feeling that management are wanting to get the lowest figure possible and someone doing their own research and coming back with legitimate higher figures puts a spanner in their plan. 

 

 

 

 


Departed
10517 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4564

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1844978 11-Aug-2017 09:35
2 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

Coil:

 

evnafets:

 

It's in management's interest to keep salaries down

 

It's in your interest to get a fair salary. 

 

Even better would be if you could point to a relatively independent source of information about salaries that you could agree on rather than each doing your own research. At least then there could be no accusations of bias. 

 

 

 



"It's in management's interest to keep salaries down" And they wonder why no one wants to be at work, has no commitment to the company and there are high staff churn rates. Invest in your staff and they will invest in you. Anyway the employers that dont invest in their staff just end up costing themselves more money in training, time, HR and they don't develop employees skills in their field.
 
I've been undervalued plenty of times and it only cost that company not myself, If your in a position like that just move on. 

 

 

 

 

Not always, I was in the habit of researching industry pay scales usually on a yearly basis. I  held the belief that I must pay industry standards or better in order to....

 

Maintain staff morale.

 

Staff retention.

 

Being able to hire the right people.

 

Paying more often costs you less.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


1298 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 526


  Reply # 1844994 11-Aug-2017 09:53
Send private message quote this post

surfisup1000:

 

kryptonjohn:

 

My initial thought is management are scared of losing key staff?

 

 

 

 

Why would staff leave before knowing the outcome of the salary investigation? It seems presumptious, and multiple salary investigations probably do not help.

 

My view is let management release their findings, then, object if you disagree.   And, if no agreement can be reached then quit and get the job with the higher salary. 

 

 

How are you going to know if you disagree without doing some research?


2464 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 907

Subscriber

  Reply # 1844998 11-Aug-2017 10:02
3 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

 

It's in management's interest to keep salaries down

 

 

Not in mine. I'm more interested in people performing well. Of course, that doesn't mean we can afford to pay over-inflated salaries, but if you underpay you typically get either get low morale, resentment, poor staff retention or disengagement. It's usually much better for the business to have an engaged, highly-productive worker on $90k than a disengaged, low-productive person in the same role on $70k.





Windows 7 x64 // i5-3570K // 16GB DDR3-1600 // GTX660Ti 2GB // Samsung 830 120GB SSD // OCZ Agility4 120GB SSD // Samsung U28D590D @ 3840x2160 & Asus PB278Q @ 2560x1440
Samsung Galaxy S5 SM-G900I w/Spark

3133 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 850


  Reply # 1845009 11-Aug-2017 10:10
Send private message quote this post

BlueShift:

 

surfisup1000:

 

kryptonjohn:

 

My initial thought is management are scared of losing key staff?

 

 

 

 

Why would staff leave before knowing the outcome of the salary investigation? It seems presumptious, and multiple salary investigations probably do not help.

 

My view is let management release their findings, then, object if you disagree.   And, if no agreement can be reached then quit and get the job with the higher salary. 

 

 

How are you going to know if you disagree without doing some research?

 

 

Sure, do some research, but keep it to oneself to use as ammunition after management release their findings.   If necessary. 


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Public Wi-Fi plus cloud file sharing
Posted 18-Aug-2017 11:20


D-Link NZ launches professional Wireless AC Wave 2 Access Point for businesses
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:25


Garmin introduces the Rino 700 five-watt two-way handheld radio
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:04


Garmin announces the Foretrex 601 and Foretrex 701 Ballistic Edition for outdoor and tactical use
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:02


Brightstar announces new distribution partnership with Samsung Knox platform in Australia
Posted 17-Aug-2017 17:07


Free gig-enabled WiFi network extends across Dunedin
Posted 17-Aug-2017 17:04


Samsung expands with connect Gear S3 Frontier
Posted 17-Aug-2017 15:55


Fact-checking Southern Cross Next cable is fastest to USA
Posted 17-Aug-2017 13:57


Thurrott says Microsoft Surface is dead last for reliability
Posted 16-Aug-2017 15:19


LibreOffice 5.4 works better with Microsoft Office files
Posted 16-Aug-2017 13:32


Certus launches Cognition
Posted 14-Aug-2017 09:31


Spark adds Cambridge, Turangi to 4.5G network
Posted 10-Aug-2017 17:55


REANNZ network to receive ongoing Government funding through to 2024
Posted 10-Aug-2017 16:05


Chorus backhaul starts with 2degrees
Posted 10-Aug-2017 15:49


New Zealanders cool on data analytics catching benefit fraud
Posted 10-Aug-2017 09:56



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.