Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4
2116 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 188


  Reply # 1849740 21-Aug-2017 11:40
Send private message quote this post

Behodar:

 

It seems that this is a common problem! Meanwhile I took my own photo and it was accepted the first time, and worked with the Smart Gate when I came back home. What are you lot all doing wrong? tongue-out

 

 

I did a home studio with self timer, reflector and 45deg over softbox. Needless to say they couldn't process it fast enough :P (Did parents same way leaving glasses on and still worked since no reflections with that method)


Banana?
4057 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 860

Subscriber

  Reply # 1849744 21-Aug-2017 11:49
Send private message quote this post

When I renewed my passport last year, I went to the Post Office for a photo, and they tried but couldn't get the system to accept it (they check it before charging you).

 

That was with the Canon DSLR at the counter. They suggested I go down to the local Fujifilm photo lab, and the owner there took one for me with a small point and shoot against the white wall in her shop. Accepted fine.


 
 
 
 


1311 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 652


  Reply # 1849745 21-Aug-2017 11:50
Send private message quote this post

I've had good redults with DIY photos, using a Lumix G6.  A few points:

 

 - as someone said above, use a mild telephoto for good perspective (you should always do this for portraits anyway unless you like people with big noses)

 

 - in conjunction with above, using a large aperture will ensure the background is blurred if you don't have a perfectly smooth backdrop

 

 - I used Picasa to edit the photo before uploading, it has preset aspect ratios which give you the exact aspect required


4742 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 877

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1849749 21-Aug-2017 11:53
Send private message quote this post

allan:

 

My wife decided she didn't like the photo she had taken by a pharmacy to renew her passport, so I said I would take one. Used a Canon Powershot SX30, which saves as jpg's, but every resolution I took and she tried to upload, failed with an error of not meeting the 4:3 aspect ratio. That can't be the actual reason, because all of the supported resolutions that it takes are a 4:3 ratio - it has to be some other aspect of the image that it actually doesn't like.

 

Anyone else has struck a similar issue or have any ideas?

 



Often it's the white of the eyes. I had to open them comically wide so the whites around the iris would be visible, then it accepted the photo. Like "OMG is that really a tiger about to bite my face off!"-wide. Wider than wide open. 

If the software doing the evaluation can't see the whites of the eyes, it rejects the photo. 





____________________________________________________
I'm on a high fibre diet. 

 

High fibre diet


997 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 358

Subscriber

  Reply # 1849755 21-Aug-2017 12:01
Send private message quote this post

Linuxluver:

 

allan:

 

My wife decided she didn't like the photo she had taken by a pharmacy to renew her passport, so I said I would take one. Used a Canon Powershot SX30, which saves as jpg's, but every resolution I took and she tried to upload, failed with an error of not meeting the 4:3 aspect ratio. That can't be the actual reason, because all of the supported resolutions that it takes are a 4:3 ratio - it has to be some other aspect of the image that it actually doesn't like.

 

Anyone else has struck a similar issue or have any ideas?

 



Often it's the white of the eyes. I had to open them comically wide so the whites around the iris would be visible, then it accepted the photo. Like "OMG is that really a tiger about to bite my face off!"-wide. Wider than wide open. 

If the software doing the evaluation can't see the whites of the eyes, it rejects the photo. 

 

 

I'm tempted to ask how my Asian friends could ever comply, but better avoid...

 

 


2231 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 223


  Reply # 1849770 21-Aug-2017 12:30
Send private message quote this post

If the image doesn't end up looking tired and grumpy the Immigration control will take longer recognizing that you are the same person. 


150 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 35


  Reply # 1849818 21-Aug-2017 13:19
Send private message quote this post

I had the same issue, use 3:4 ratio, that fixed the issue.

 

Also there was previously an issue for people of Asian origins where they ask them to open their eyes....


5054 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2322


  Reply # 1849821 21-Aug-2017 13:22
Send private message quote this post

I've had no problems getting photos accepted - following the instructions.  I used bounce-flash so no shadows on wall behind from direct flash, 105mm focal length at f2.8, cropped and resized.  The passports work in smart gate no problem.

 

Instructions for NZ passports are here.

 

Photo-checker is here.

 

As well as the possibility of problems with incorrect sizing, there's also a potential problem with how orientation is stored in jpeg metadata and whether the software used for editing and displaying the image recognises the orientation tag.  

 

The most evil feature ever conceived: the Exif Orientation Tag

 

 

 

 

1547 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 84


  Reply # 1849933 21-Aug-2017 17:40
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

No woman likes their passport photo ... my wife recently went to 3 different photo shops, paid $60 total, and went with the first one in the end !!!  Arghhhhh!

 

yell


291 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 36


  Reply # 1849957 21-Aug-2017 18:43
Send private message quote this post

Behodar:

It seems that this is a common problem! Meanwhile I took my own photo and it was accepted the first time, and worked with the Smart Gate when I came back home. What are you lot all doing wrong? tongue-out



Smiling ☺

289 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 3


  Reply # 1851760 24-Aug-2017 10:21
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

so had this a few months back..Took photo, loaded into photo editor, resized and cropped to correct pixel size etc then submitted and it kept getting rejected. Was driving me batty.  

 

Then had a look through the camera menus and lo and behold - had to change the ratios on the camera itself then it worked perfectly first time.

 

It would appear there is some metadata being generated by the camera that physically resizing etc within software doesn't amend. 


997 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 358

Subscriber

  Reply # 1851765 24-Aug-2017 10:27
Send private message quote this post

Yep - can confirm there are settings on my Samsung to set it to 4:3 instead of 16:9.


5054 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2322


  Reply # 1853339 27-Aug-2017 17:47
Send private message quote this post

Rickles:

 

No woman likes their passport photo ... my wife recently went to 3 different photo shops, paid $60 total, and went with the first one in the end !!!  Arghhhhh!

 

yell

 

 

I did another passport photo yesterday for a 20YO friend of my son. There's obvious limits to what you can do creatively to a front on portrait where you've got to have a neutral expression, but lighting (I use indirect bounce flash), low saturation, low contrast, low sharpening. I used a full-frame camera with fast 105mm lens for shallow depth of field.  The result was pretty good, she was happy (probably not ecstatic though) and the image went through the passport photo checker system first go. I've done a couple of others like this, with shallow DOF.  So long as the eyes and face features are sharp enough, the "smart gate" biometric scanners at the airport have no problem with the passports.  Use a digital camera set to default or even worse, a landscape scene mode etc, and the high saturation / contrast shows every tiny pore on the skin. Stuff nobody needs to see. Some cameras may have a "portrait" scene mode. Probably some of the newer dual camera phones can do a pretty reasonable job too.


5054 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2322


  Reply # 1853342 27-Aug-2017 17:54
Send private message quote this post

gedc:

 

 

 

It would appear there is some metadata being generated by the camera that physically resizing etc within software doesn't amend. 

 

 

Not sure if it's related, but I tend to strip metadata when saving as jpeg for purposes like that.  It's not needed and could lead to complications, especially with orientation and rotation tags.

 

If you don't have a photo editor that can strip the jpeg data, then copy the image in the photo editor window, paste as a "new image", then save as jpeg.  AFAIK (and IIRC the Windows API), the windows clipboard holds the copied image as a bitmap, all exif metadata is lost.


IcI

501 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 113

Trusted

  Reply # 1853350 27-Aug-2017 18:26
Send private message quote this post

Fred99: ... If you don't have a photo editor that can strip the jpeg data, ...
Open your image and save it again in MS Paint. Annoyingly, it too strips the meta data.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Phone prices rising as users move upmarket
Posted 24-Nov-2017 17:16


Talking net neutrality on RNZ Nine-to-Noon
Posted 24-Nov-2017 12:11


Air New Zealand experiments with blockchain technology
Posted 23-Nov-2017 15:39


Symantec selects Amazon Web Services to deliver cloud security
Posted 23-Nov-2017 10:40


New Zealand Ministry of Education chooses Unisys for cloud-based education resourcing management system
Posted 22-Nov-2017 22:00


Business analytics software powers profits for NZ wine producers
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:52


Pyrios strikes up alliance with Microsoft integrator UC Logiq
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:51


The New Zealand IT services ecosystem - it's all digital down here
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:49


Volvo to supply tens of thousands of autonomous drive compatible cars to Uber
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:46


From small to medium and beyond: Navigating the ERP battlefield
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:12


Business owners: ERP software selection starts (and finishes) with you
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:11


Why I'm not an early adopter
Posted 21-Nov-2017 10:39


Netatmo launches smart home products in New Zealand
Posted 20-Nov-2017 20:06


Huawei Mate 10: Punchy, long battery life, artificial intelligence
Posted 20-Nov-2017 16:30


Propel launch Disney Star Wars Laser Battle Drones
Posted 19-Nov-2017 21:26



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.