Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
830 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 692

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 1896660 7-Nov-2017 10:32
Send private message

Dingbatt: Perhaps we could take a leaf from Doctor Quinn Medicine Woman when referring to physicians? Although that then runs the risk of being too gender specific, so maybe appending "Medical Professional", but then you run into the problem of being confused with politicians when abbreviated.

Maybe people shouldn't wake up in the morning thinking "I wonder what I can be offended by today?". Our worse what they can be offended about on behalf of others.

 

Dr Quinn: Medical Human Entity?


2620 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 632


  Reply # 1896662 7-Nov-2017 10:38
Send private message

surfisup1000:

 

vexxxboy:

 

im more amazed that a Dr didnt know that Mongolism was a offensive word to describe Downs, i thought even the average person knew that.

 

 

I didn't know it was used to describe downs. 

 

I was vaguely aware that it could be used as an insult but wasn't sure why. 

 

People are getting carried away in my view, her explanation is perfectly reasonable and people are seeking offense. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

as it has been said ,, basically what you were saying was that a whole race of people were abnormal, the Mongols, because there eyes were different. There are a lot of words to describe people in the 50's 60's and 70's that are not tolerated today. the N word to describe African Americans, Fruits to describe homosexuals , spastics to describe special needs people etc. No excuse for ignorance , it should have been picked up in the proof reading stage.





Common sense is not as common as you think.


4548 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1822


  Reply # 1896669 7-Nov-2017 10:45
One person supports this post
Send private message

eracode:

 

I've been amused by the situation where a nurse does post-grad study to complete a PhD in nursing - and then a nurse is a doctor.

 

 

The above is an effect of the university-ising of vocational training that used to be delivered by dedicated institutions or poly-techs.  No disrespect to universities, but I don't think they are effective institutes for teaching practical vocations.

 

They drive an increased cost, an increased academic and socio-political focus and a decreased practical focus.  Lecturers may be highly regarded researchers but have not worked in the vocation hands-on for along time - or ever. 

 

 

 

 





Mike

388 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 83


  Reply # 1896676 7-Nov-2017 10:58
2 people support this post
Send private message

MadEngineer:
Funny, when googling that sentence it seems that she got that from the "Nexus" magazine.

wsnz: 
Her PhD thesis was on the biochemical and nutritional factors that impact on autism, so it's related. 

Herald Article:
Director of advocacy, Trish Grant, said the connection made between Down syndrome and folate had an "extraordinary lack of basic science". "Down syndrome has nothing to do with folate. "I think the comments are not only inaccurate but also distressing. They have potential to cause a lot of unnecessary harm," Grant said.

You would think that a person who has those qualifications in that area would know that folate has no connection to Downs Syndrome, which is also known as “Trisomy 21” which means they have xtra expression or leg on chromosome 21.
It makes you think how much of her thesis was plagiarised and how sloppy her research was. This is how all this anti-vaccination crap got going because some idiot did very sloppy research. Trish Grant in the Herald article is quite correct when she says “They have potential to cause a lot of unnecessary harm,”. The only people who will benefit out of this misinformation would be the health shops and supplement manufactures.





iMac 27" (late 2013), Airport Time Capsule + Airport Express, iPhone7, iPad6, iPad Mini2

 

Panasonic Blu-ray PVR DMR-BWT835 + Panasonic Viera TH-L50E6Z, Chromecast Ultra


2649 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 509


  Reply # 1896680 7-Nov-2017 11:01
Send private message

I recall it being used in the 70s commonly enough but pretty sure it went out of fashion in the 80s.

 

So I would say it is now certainly an 'archaic' term - and I am not surpised than many of you (presumably of younger and more tender age) ie less than 50, might not have heard it used before.

 

I am very surprised of somone of her apparent age using that term - nevermind her education.

 

Possibly she is much much older than she appears - so maybe she really does know about nutrition and how to look after herself laughing





Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself - A. H. Weiler

156 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 75


  Reply # 1896707 7-Nov-2017 11:36
Send private message

robjg63:

 

I recall it being used in the 70s commonly enough but pretty sure it went out of fashion in the 80s.

 

So I would say it is now certainly an 'archaic' term - and I am not surpised than many of you (presumably of younger and more tender age) ie less than 50, might not have heard it used before.

 

I am very surprised of somone of her apparent age using that term - nevermind her education.

 

Possibly she is much much older than she appears - so maybe she really does know about nutrition and how to look after herself laughing

 

 

 

 

Yes, it is similar for many apparently race-based terms which fell out of favour around the same time period. You will still sometimes hear an older person using them. But very uncommon for someone under 50 to use them. If they od it can be with the intention of causing offense. I also don't think it was used in any scientific or medical sense, more as a colloquial term.


4548 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1822


  Reply # 1896714 7-Nov-2017 11:43
Send private message

FineWine:

 

This is how all this anti-vaccination crap got going because some idiot did very sloppy research.

 

 

If you are talking about the MMR-autism fiasco ... it's far worse than sloppy - it was fraudulent publication by a person with multiple undisclosed conflicts of interests who had manipulated clinical data.  The publication was retracted in by the publisher (Lancet).

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Wakefield





Mike

2649 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 509


  Reply # 1896719 7-Nov-2017 12:03
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

FineWine:

 

This is how all this anti-vaccination crap got going because some idiot did very sloppy research.

 

 

If you are talking about the MMR-autism fiasco ... it's far worse than sloppy - it was fraudulent publication by a person with multiple undisclosed conflicts of interests who had manipulated clinical data.  The publication was retracted in by the publisher (Lancet).

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Wakefield

 

 

Yep -  totally made up without any scientific fact - but its out there is the world now, and will (in all probability) never go away. Seems the appetite of the conspiriacy theorists knows no end.

 

I blame it all on contrails.





Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself - A. H. Weiler

472 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 107


  Reply # 1896730 7-Nov-2017 12:24
Send private message

FineWine:

 

wsnz: 
Her PhD thesis was on the biochemical and nutritional factors that impact on autism, so it's related. 


You would think that a person who has those qualifications in that area would know that folate has no connection to Downs Syndrome, which is also known as “Trisomy 21” which means they have xtra expression or leg on chromosome 21.
It makes you think how much of her thesis was plagiarised and how sloppy her research was. This is how all this anti-vaccination crap got going because some idiot did very sloppy research. Trish Grant in the Herald article is quite correct when she says “They have potential to cause a lot of unnecessary harm,”. The only people who will benefit out of this misinformation would be the health shops and supplement manufactures.

 

 

 

 

Just to be clear, without the context of the quote relating to what I said above, it looks like I'm agreeing with the link between nutrition and autism - I'm not. I'm agreeing that her PhD topic is related to her supposed area of expertise.

 

 

 

Anyway, yes it'd be interesting to read her thesis and see what correlation she draws between the two. I have my doubts, but I'm not an expert in that field.


3642 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1164


  Reply # 1896738 7-Nov-2017 12:41
Send private message

vexxxboy:

 

as it has been said ,, basically what you were saying was that a whole race of people were abnormal, the Mongols, because there eyes were different. There are a lot of words to describe people in the 50's 60's and 70's that are not tolerated today. the N word to describe African Americans, Fruits to describe homosexuals , spastics to describe special needs people etc. No excuse for ignorance , it should have been picked up in the proof reading stage.

 

 

Strawman argument. 

 

Those 'other' words were created to insult from the start .

 

Few people today know that mongol was once used to describe downs syndrome, and the word itself was a medical term for the condition and used in textbooks.

 

So, you are trying to take offence here?  

 

I think she is right to apologise, but why can't we accept the error and move on?


242 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 29


  Reply # 1896741 7-Nov-2017 12:43
2 people support this post
Send private message

Every time I hear "mongoloid", I start humming (quietly, to myself) an old song by Devo.

 

 

 

I was around when that song came out, and I knew it was an offensive term even then...





I reject your reality and substitute my own!
- Adam Savage, Mythbuster

1375 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 579


  Reply # 1896822 7-Nov-2017 13:50
Send private message

surfisup1000:

 

vexxxboy:

 

as it has been said ,, basically what you were saying was that a whole race of people were abnormal, the Mongols, because there eyes were different. There are a lot of words to describe people in the 50's 60's and 70's that are not tolerated today. the N word to describe African Americans, Fruits to describe homosexuals , spastics to describe special needs people etc. No excuse for ignorance , it should have been picked up in the proof reading stage.

 

 

Strawman argument. 

 

Those 'other' words were created to insult from the start .

 

Few people today know that mongol was once used to describe downs syndrome, and the word itself was a medical term for the condition and used in textbooks.

 

So, you are trying to take offence here?  

 

I think she is right to apologise, but why can't we accept the error and move on?

 

 

None of those words were originally created as insults, their offensiveness came through later use . Just as there are many other words which were originally medical terms used by the professionals of the time, which partly through changed understanding of the conditions, and partly because they were co-opted as insults, are no longer in medical use. Words like idiot, moron, cretin, spastic, retard, and mongoloid all had specific medical meanings. Now they don't. 

 

 


4548 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1822


  Reply # 1896829 7-Nov-2017 13:59
One person supports this post
Send private message

Is any one a Shameless fan?

 

 





Mike



17268 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4939

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1896831 7-Nov-2017 14:01
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

Is any one a Shameless fan?

 

 

 

 

Yes Sir!

 

 




17268 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4939

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1896832 7-Nov-2017 14:01
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

Is any one a Shameless fan?

 

 

 

 

Yes Sir!

 

 


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central launches
Posted 10-Jul-2018 10:40


Spark completes first milestone in voice platform upgrade
Posted 10-Jul-2018 09:36


Microsoft ices heated developers
Posted 6-Jul-2018 20:16


PB Technologies charged for its extended warranties and warned for bait advertising
Posted 3-Jul-2018 15:45


Almost 20,000 people claim credits from Spark
Posted 29-Jun-2018 10:40


Cove sells NZ's first insurance policy via chatbot
Posted 25-Jun-2018 10:04


N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34


Enable doubles fibre broadband speeds for its most popular wholesale service in Christchurch
Posted 2-Jun-2018 20:07



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.