Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 
13114 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6160

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1897432 8-Nov-2017 11:09
Send private message

networkn:

 

MikeB4:

 

Please tell how the term is not offensive and racist?

 

"Down syndrome refers to the 19th century English physician J. Langdon Down who described the condition in 1866. In great error, Langdon Down attributed the condition to a "reversion" to the "mongoloid race." He held that evolution had been reversed and there had been a sort of backslide from the superior Caucasian to the inferior Oriental race. The misnomer "mongolism" is incorrect and racist ."

 

 

No-one is disputing it's technically offensive and or racist, but what is being argued is what should be done about it. I and many others consider it equally offensive to destroy 20,000 books, which yes, technically, can be recycled but will have significant cost and does create environmental effects. 

 

I *think* most people who would have been offended, would be placated with a heartfelt apology, perhaps a donation to Downs Syndrome Research and an undertaking by the author to learn from their mistake. The small percentage of the small percentage of people who are affected and who wouldn't be placated, doesn't balance out destroying 20,000 books. 

 

 

 

I think you might be being a touch too sensitive on this one. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes I am sensitive to racism and all prejudice and I make no apology for that. At least the author of the book did the right thing and withdrew it. 





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


Aussie
4235 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1205

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1897828 8-Nov-2017 21:03
One person supports this post
Send private message

Streisand Effect.

 

 

 

The plagiarism is quite handy :D

 

 

 

And the fact the whole book sounds like pseudo-science BS.


Mad Scientist
19012 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2469

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1897866 8-Nov-2017 21:36
Send private message

Is this book a compilation of Readers' Digest?


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.