Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




1034 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 356


Topic # 224264 9-Nov-2017 22:19
Send private message quote this post

Nothing good could come from this at all IMO.

 

 

 

https://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/social-networking/98700753/facebook-says-it-needs-your-explicit-photos-to-combat-revenge-porn





Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding : Ice cream man , Ice cream man


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
Aussie
4106 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1132

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1898561 9-Nov-2017 22:29
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

I'm just sitting here shaking my head... (I don't have a FB account)

 

 

 

 

 

https://gizmodo.com/how-facebook-figures-out-everyone-youve-ever-met-1819822691?IR=T

 

 

 

 


5241 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2474


  Reply # 1898570 9-Nov-2017 23:11
2 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

I'm feeling a Snopes rebuttal will probably come on this story. I don't believe even Facebook would be so dumb.

 
 
 
 


21125 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1093

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1898578 10-Nov-2017 01:04
Send private message quote this post

Mark Z can filter thru them and check each one out

 

Linux


10295 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3175

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1898579 10-Nov-2017 01:05
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Not actually ever having taken any, this would be one thing I can safely ignore!





Talk DIrtY to me
4059 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2108

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1898583 10-Nov-2017 04:06
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Ok, I'll take one and send it to them. Not my fault if they die of shock! tongue-out


2479 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 534


  Reply # 1898586 10-Nov-2017 06:01
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Meh, my poor neighbours get a regular eye-full anyway.





I know a little more than nothing but not much...

Mad Scientist
17738 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2176

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1898602 10-Nov-2017 06:51
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

This is just the start. Soon your iPhone X won't unlock with anything other than your naked body. Then Apple Pay ... and everything else will follow. Those who take their pics on Viagra, make sure you don't run out of supplies or the coffee queue will be very long.


Mad Scientist
17738 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2176

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1898604 10-Nov-2017 06:55
Send private message quote this post

DarthKermit:

 

Ok, I'll take one and send it to them. Not my fault if they die of shock! tongue-out

 

 

Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder. I'm sure there will be a secret admirer for every shape and size.


Mad Scientist
17738 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2176

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1898605 10-Nov-2017 06:56
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Fred99: I'm feeling a Snopes rebuttal will probably come on this story. I don't believe even Facebook would be so dumb.

 

It's on Stuff, it must be true!


1354 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 694


  Reply # 1898606 10-Nov-2017 06:57
2 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

I would have thought that if they really wanted to achieve this result, it would be better to make software available to people so that they can create the "digital footprint" of the image at home, and send just the footprint to Facebook - that's what they say will be stored.


4128 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1674

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1898607 10-Nov-2017 07:05
4 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

dickytim:

 

Meh, my poor neighbours get a regular eye-full anyway.

 

 

 

 

Username checks out.





iPad Air + iPhone SE + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


4128 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1674

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1898611 10-Nov-2017 07:08
Send private message quote this post

shk292:

 

I would have thought that if they really wanted to achieve this result, it would be better to make software available to people so that they can create the "digital footprint" of the image at home, and send just the footprint to Facebook - that's what they say will be stored.

 

 

 

 

Silly, of course they're not going to do that. Because otherwise it would take about 24 hours for someone to write a small open source utility that would operate in a peer-to-peer mode to generate all possible footprints and send them to Facebook.





iPad Air + iPhone SE + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


1354 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 694


  Reply # 1898661 10-Nov-2017 09:40
Send private message quote this post

SaltyNZ:

 

Silly, of course they're not going to do that. Because otherwise it would take about 24 hours for someone to write a small open source utility that would operate in a peer-to-peer mode to generate all possible footprints and send them to Facebook.

 

 

I'm trying to work out why that would be desirable, regardless of whether it would be possible.  It's interesting (if you're into crypto etc) to work out how an alogrotihm could recognise a specific photo, and not be fooled by things as easy as cropping or simple image manipulation, and also not generate countless false positives.

 

But, an easy defence to your hypothesis would be to put a limit on how many footprints can be uploaded by each facebook user, and to use things like captchas for uploading.  If you have 10000 dodgy photos of yourself then I think you can take your chances.


4128 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1674

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1898737 10-Nov-2017 10:40
Send private message quote this post

shk292:

 

SaltyNZ:

 

Silly, of course they're not going to do that. Because otherwise it would take about 24 hours for someone to write a small open source utility that would operate in a peer-to-peer mode to generate all possible footprints and send them to Facebook.

 

 

I'm trying to work out why that would be desirable, regardless of whether it would be possible.  It's interesting (if you're into crypto etc) to work out how an alogrotihm could recognise a specific photo, and not be fooled by things as easy as cropping or simple image manipulation, and also not generate countless false positives.

 

But, an easy defence to your hypothesis would be to put a limit on how many footprints can be uploaded by each facebook user, and to use things like captchas for uploading.  If you have 10000 dodgy photos of yourself then I think you can take your chances.

 

 

 

 

Well, in this scenario, the fake client would not actually be fingerprinting photos, just incrementing a counter to send as a fingerprint. The P2P aspect is to make sure the work of generating counters is divided up evenly so not every client submits fingerprint 000000000000 etc. If you were at all interested in subverting the feature, you would use a botnet to do it, which will limit the number of fingerprints each client needs to submit (because the botnet is already large) and also provides you with the tools to handle captchas.

 

 





iPad Air + iPhone SE + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


2129 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1027


  Reply # 1898748 10-Nov-2017 11:00
Send private message quote this post

This is the same kind of technology used by tineye.com, I guess, which can recognise cropped and otherwise edited versions of an image. e.g. searching for SaltyNZ's avatar finds 3734 variants.

 

I wonder how accurate the "digital footprint" is? i.e. if it's *really* accurate, then it could be used to regenerate something quite similar to the original.

 

 


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

New Zealand hits peak broadband data
Posted 18-Jan-2018 12:21


Amazon Echo devices coming to New Zealand early February 2018
Posted 18-Jan-2018 10:53


$3.74 million for new electric vehicles in New Zealand
Posted 17-Jan-2018 11:27


Nova 2i: Value, not excitement from Huawei
Posted 17-Jan-2018 09:02


Less news in Facebook News Feed revamp
Posted 15-Jan-2018 13:15


Australian Government contract awarded to Datacom Connect
Posted 11-Jan-2018 08:37


Why New Zealand needs a chief technology officer
Posted 6-Jan-2018 13:59


Amazon release Silk Browser and Firefox for Fire TV
Posted 21-Dec-2017 13:42


New Chief Technology Officer role created
Posted 19-Dec-2017 22:18


All I want for Christmas is a new EV
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:54


How clever is this: AI will create 2.3 million jobs by 2020
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:52


NOW to deploy SD-WAN to regional councils
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:46


Mobile market competition issues ComCom should watch
Posted 18-Dec-2017 10:52


New Zealand government to create digital advisory group
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:47


Australia datum changes means whole country moving 1.8 metres north-east
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:39



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.