Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11


17106 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4841

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1955922 12-Feb-2018 17:47
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

Both and neither had unlimited budgets

 

 

Well clearly, I need to put my prices up significantly.


312 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 74


  Reply # 1955926 12-Feb-2018 18:00
4 people support this post
Send private message

personal I feel the gov need to pay the normal wage of the person there, drop jury duty or force employer to pay(in that order), I know I would be biased if I was forced to go and only get paid $62 for the day.


12423 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5828

Trusted

  Reply # 1955928 12-Feb-2018 18:02
2 people support this post
Send private message

networkn:

 

MikeB4:

 

Both and neither had unlimited budgets

 

 

Well clearly, I need to put my prices up significantly.

 

 

 

 

Seriously though managing leave no matter what leave it is just part of effective management and you need to make opex allowances for it..  How many days have you had staff away on jury service in the last two years ?





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


13980 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1762


  Reply # 1955930 12-Feb-2018 18:11
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

mattwnz:

 

I think they should make more use of retired people of jury duty. It should solve the problem of people not being able to do it due to other commitments associated with life in 2018. especially as many younger people these days have huge mortgages for overpriced houses, so can't afford the time off. Older people have far more life experience, and can also have far more common sense.

 

 

I always paid full wages to someone on Jury service. I also did not consider it annual leave or sick leave.

 

 

 

 

I can imagine it would be very difficult for some companies to do this, especially if you have only 1-3 staff, as a missing staff member takes away a large percentage of your productive working hours. The only way around it is to charge more, and build up an allowance to cover these things. I wonder if big retailers do pay people on jury service, as some will not pay much more than min wage?  Being self employed it is very difficult, as the money has to come from somewhere, as if you aren't working you don't get paid. I doubt there is any insurance cover for loss of income. Maybe income protection insurance, but I doubt that covers jury service.?


470 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 107


  Reply # 1955938 12-Feb-2018 18:29
4 people support this post
Send private message

mattwnz:

 

I think they should make more use of retired people of jury duty. It should solve the problem of people not being able to do it due to other commitments associated with life in 2018. especially as many younger people these days have huge mortgages for overpriced houses, so can't afford the time off. Older people have far more life experience, and can also have far more common sense.

 

 

 

 

Unfortunately that skews the composition of the jury though. That's not something that will help contribute to a fair and just trial.


90 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 23


  Reply # 1955971 12-Feb-2018 19:52
5 people support this post
Send private message

mattwnz:

Older people have far more life experience, and can also have far more common sense.



Old people are also typically much more conservative and stuck in the past than younger people too, which introduces all kinds of bias around certain laws.

3924 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 660

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1955976 12-Feb-2018 20:08
Send private message

It is interesting that the standard response form accommodates people who object on religious grounds, but doesn't allow for personal beliefs of a political nature. I wonder if there is any case law that has tested this against section 13 of the Bill of Rights Act?

 

Ultimately they can probably force you to go, but do they really want people in the jury room who are not willing or able to engage constructively with the other jurors?


1169 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 868

Subscriber

Reply # 1956032 12-Feb-2018 21:37
One person supports this post
Send private message

mattwnz:

 

I think they should make more use of retired people of jury duty. It should solve the problem of people not being able to do it due to other commitments associated with life in 2018. especially as many younger people these days have huge mortgages for overpriced houses, so can't afford the time off. Older people have far more life experience, and can also have far more common sense.

 

 

Worst idea ever. It's bad enough that we have juries in the first place; it'll be doubly worse if the most socially conservative group in society became over-represented in juries.

 

And I am someone who's taken part in jury trials for all three sides of the law.

 

 

 

 


436 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 275


  Reply # 1956037 12-Feb-2018 21:43
Send private message

What happens if a juror keeps falling asleep in court? Trials can continue with 11 jurors. Maybe the judge just releases the juror and that's it? OP, does your employee have trouble staying awake?


2479 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1139


  Reply # 1956045 12-Feb-2018 22:05
One person supports this post
Send private message

dejadeadnz:

 

Worst idea ever. It's bad enough that we have juries in the first place [...]

 

 

Why? I would have thought that juries were a fairly basic right, and a key protection against oppressive or totalitarian governments. For example, faced with bad law (eg a huge penalty for giving food to the hungry child of a striking watersider in NZ) juries have been known to simply refuse to convict.


1169 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 868

Subscriber

  Reply # 1956052 12-Feb-2018 22:33
5 people support this post
Send private message

JimmyH:

 

Why? I would have thought that juries were a fairly basic right, and a key protection against oppressive or totalitarian governments. For example, faced with bad law (eg a huge penalty for giving food to the hungry child of a striking watersider in NZ) juries have been known to simply refuse to convict.

 

 

Hardly. Plenty of liberal, democratic countries with excellent record of human rights do not have right of trial by juries. Just look at most of continental Europe.

 

If the concern is for the getting to the truth and conclusions being reached through a careful and thorough examination of the evidence with as little reference to human prejudices as possible, why anyone would prefer a panel of jurors -- some of whom could be terribly uneducated and stupid -- as opposed to a panel of judges, is beyond me. The panel of judges would have (at a minimum) completed a tertiary degree and will be required to issue a written decision which will be closely examined for their statement of and application of the law and examination of evidence. This is opposed to a bunch of unaccountable jurors being able to just call out someone as guilty or not guilty without having to give any reasons. 

 

 

 

 


3583 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1139


  Reply # 1956059 12-Feb-2018 23:14
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

networkn:

 

MikeB4:

 

when I was an employer it was a pain but the notice period is reasonable and allows time to plan around it. I did on occasion get a key project team member deferred and the process was uncomplicated. On a personal note I was permanently excused service due to my medical condition a few years back. 

 

 

You have obviously never run a small business where having 25% of your workforce is missing. 

 

I don't think there is a way to have reasonable notice of that for some positions within a company. 

 

Worse still, I have to pay this person, while they can't work.

 

 

Incorrect, I have managed staffing establishments from seven staff up to sixty. Yes it's a pain but no more so than managing annual and sick leave, and the key word is managing and it was my job to do just that.

 

 

For a well resourced government department ?

 

It can be entirely different in private organisations. 

 

I'm just saying, your experience is not reflective of all. 


3583 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1139


  Reply # 1956061 12-Feb-2018 23:18
Send private message

I used to be called for jury duty every year but my job at the time was of critical importance to the company.  Talking millions of dollars in damages if something goes wrong and I am not there at critical points in time. 

 

So , I managed to get off each time although the last time was very difficult and the authorities were very obstructive. 

 

However, my job has changed such that I could now do jury duty. But, they have stopped asking! And I'd quite like to try it. 

 

 

 

 

 

 


581 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 214


  Reply # 1956062 12-Feb-2018 23:25
Send private message

Same, I was called several times when a student and also when out of the country. Now that I'm in a job where I could go (and I would still get paid) they don't ask me!

 

If only you could put your name forward to get it out of the way.




17106 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4841

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1956064 12-Feb-2018 23:35
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

networkn:

 

MikeB4:

 

Both and neither had unlimited budgets

 

 

Well clearly, I need to put my prices up significantly.

 

 

 

 

Seriously though managing leave no matter what leave it is just part of effective management and you need to make opex allowances for it..  How many days have you had staff away on jury service in the last two years ?

 

 

It's hard for me to understand how you could have worked for a small private company and produce these views. 2 Weeks of a Key staff members salary is a significant hit, esp when that person may not be earning for the company in that time as well as not being able to deal with workloads. 

 

Maybe you have been fortunate to work with companies with huge revenue and profit margins but I'd suggest to you that the VAST majority of companies under 5 people in NZ would find this extremely challenging. 

 

It's easy to be flippant when it's not your money on the line. 

 

It won't break me, but it's extremely challenging. 14 weeks of a single day would be considerably less difficult to manage than 14 days consecutively. 

 

We have decided not to challenge it, I doubt we would have luck anyway now the jury is seated. Wouldn't be fair. I am hoping it's over quicker than two weeks. 

 

Personally, I think in companies with less than 10 people, there should be tolerance from the Government/Legal System.

 

 


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34


Enable doubles fibre broadband speeds for its most popular wholesale service in Christchurch
Posted 2-Jun-2018 20:07


All or Nothing: New Zealand All Blacks arrives on Amazon Prime Video
Posted 2-Jun-2018 16:21


Innovation Grant, High Tech Awards and new USA office for Kiwi tech company SwipedOn
Posted 1-Jun-2018 20:54


Commerce Commission warns Apple for misleading consumers about their rights
Posted 30-May-2018 13:15


IBM leads Call for Code to use cloud, data, AI, blockchain for natural disaster relief
Posted 25-May-2018 14:12


New FUJIFILM X-T100 aims to do better job than smartphones
Posted 24-May-2018 20:17


Stuff takes 100% ownership of Stuff Fibre
Posted 24-May-2018 19:41



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.