Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
Mad Scientist
18913 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2457

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2034281 12-Jun-2018 11:50
Send private message quote this post

Finding life on Mars, unless they break physics, won't change science or scientific facts.

 

Biblical god argument - life on Mars AFAIK doesn't contradict anything in the bible that should break theology. Wasn't there giants (nephilim) roaming on earth that were the product of male gods and female humans? They were wiped out by Noah's flood. That is extraterrestial stuff.


Glurp
7978 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3712

Subscriber

  Reply # 2034282 12-Jun-2018 11:51
Send private message quote this post

Hammerer:

 

Aha, now I understand you. Maybe I shouldn't have used that approach. I was only criticising the overstatement of certainty in the context of lack of data. As I said "Both are tenuous conclusions not based on the data." There is no evidence that this is true except that we have life on earth that is intelligent. It is conjecture to say that any alien life will also prove alien intelligent life.

 

It is much easier to see the assertion of certainty doesn't hold up in the negative as that is normally the case because, by definition, there is no evidence. I wasn't trying to say that the two statements were "equivalent", i.e. that A therefore B is the same as not A therefore not B. I was simply saying that lack of evidence precludes such strong assertions.

 

 

I based my sweeping assertion on what I still feel is a highly likely probability. At the moment we only have terrestrial evolution to extrapolate from so the evidence is limited. It is impossible to truly wrap our minds around the real size of the Universe, but it might actually be close to infinite. The numbers of stars and planets cannot be grasped. For all practical purposes, they are limitless. If we find evidence of any kind of extraterrestrial life, that makes it almost a certainty that life is widespread in the Universe. If it is, the numbers make it extremely likely that it would evolve intelligence many times over, as it has here in just 4 billion years. I don't see what is wrong with that logic, but I am happy to stand corrected.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


12855 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6074

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2034283 12-Jun-2018 11:54
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Batman:

 

 

 

Finding life on Mars, unless they break physics, won't change science or scientific facts.

 

Biblical god argument - life on Mars AFAIK doesn't contradict anything in the bible that should break theology. Wasn't there giants roaming on earth that were the product of gods and humans? They were wiped out by Noah's flood. That is as alien as it gets in this theology.

 

 

 

 

of course if they find God on Mars the S could hit the proverbial F tongue-out





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


Mad Scientist
18913 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2457

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2034285 12-Jun-2018 11:58
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

Batman:

 

 

 

Finding life on Mars, unless they break physics, won't change science or scientific facts.

 

Biblical god argument - life on Mars AFAIK doesn't contradict anything in the bible that should break theology. Wasn't there giants roaming on earth that were the product of gods and humans? They were wiped out by Noah's flood. That is as alien as it gets in this theology.

 

 

 

 

of course if they find God on Mars the S could hit the proverbial F tongue-out

 

 

Dude, I have friends who believe that the earth is hollow and that some weird things are going on below us. Can't remember much more than that. Don't know if they're religious or not.


12855 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6074

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2034288 12-Jun-2018 12:00
Send private message quote this post

Batman:

 

MikeB4:

 

Batman:

 

 

 

Finding life on Mars, unless they break physics, won't change science or scientific facts.

 

Biblical god argument - life on Mars AFAIK doesn't contradict anything in the bible that should break theology. Wasn't there giants roaming on earth that were the product of gods and humans? They were wiped out by Noah's flood. That is as alien as it gets in this theology.

 

 

 

 

of course if they find God on Mars the S could hit the proverbial F tongue-out

 

 

Dude, I have friends who believe that the earth is hollow and that some weird things are going on below us. Can't remember much more than that. Don't know if they're religious or not.

 

 

 

 

It's the 10 foot lizard people that live under the flat Earth 





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


4952 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2009


  Reply # 2034289 12-Jun-2018 12:00
Send private message quote this post

Fred99:

 

MikeAqua:

 

The best information we have suggests that life can arise in particular conditions that occur or have occurred on earth.  But ... we don't have direct evidence that life can spontaneously arise.

 

 

What do you mean?

 

Without direct observation of abiogenesis occuring in real time without influence of a creator in any way, creationists will always have a way out.  God could have always directed that particular cosmic ray or lightning bolt that sparked the reaction etc.

 

In total absence of evidence of any god, the evidence that we do have that life arose spontaneously on Earth is extremely compelling and is about as direct as we'll ever likely get.  Finding life elsewhere would just make the biblical god argument less believable than it already is.

 

 

I agree the evidence we have is compelling but it's circumstantial.  No-one has yet made life in experiments. 

 

I'm saying we could be wrong about life spontaneously arising on earth.  I don't think the theories of spontaneous development of life on earth are wrong, but I accept they could be. 

 

Alternate (and less likely) theories might include transport from another planet via natural processes (e.g. resting stages of bacteria transported in an icy meteor) or transplantation by intelligent extra terrestrial life forms (even less likely).

 

My views have nothing to do with any religious perspective, just a healthy scientific scepticism and general aversion to absolute facts.





Mike

4952 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2009


  Reply # 2034291 12-Jun-2018 12:02
Send private message quote this post

Batman:

 

Dude, I have friends who believe that the earth is hollow and that some weird things are going on below us. Can't remember much more than that. Don't know if they're religious or not.

 

 

It is hollow - filled with sticky liquid and a solid, chewy centre like some sort of cosmic confectionery item.





Mike

Mad Scientist
18913 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2457

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2034300 12-Jun-2018 12:15
Send private message quote this post

MikeAqua:

 

Fred99:

 

MikeAqua:

 

The best information we have suggests that life can arise in particular conditions that occur or have occurred on earth.  But ... we don't have direct evidence that life can spontaneously arise.

 

 

What do you mean?

 

Without direct observation of abiogenesis occuring in real time without influence of a creator in any way, creationists will always have a way out.  God could have always directed that particular cosmic ray or lightning bolt that sparked the reaction etc.

 

In total absence of evidence of any god, the evidence that we do have that life arose spontaneously on Earth is extremely compelling and is about as direct as we'll ever likely get.  Finding life elsewhere would just make the biblical god argument less believable than it already is.

 

 

I agree the evidence we have is compelling but it's circumstantial.  No-one has yet made life in experiments. 

 

I'm saying we could be wrong about life spontaneously arising on earth.  I don't think the theories of spontaneous development of life on earth are wrong, but I accept they could be. 

 

Alternate (and less likely) theories might include transport from another planet via natural processes (e.g. resting stages of bacteria transported in an icy meteor) or transplantation by intelligent extra terrestrial life forms (even less likely).

 

My views have nothing to do with any religious perspective, just a healthy scientific scepticism and general aversion to absolute facts.

 

 

Nothing can be more correct that this post.


1650 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 389

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2034301 12-Jun-2018 12:20
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

Batman:

 

Dude, I have friends who believe that the earth is hollow and that some weird things are going on below us. Can't remember much more than that. Don't know if they're religious or not.

 

 

It's the 10 foot lizard people that live under the flat Earth 

 

 

Quite likely to be Vernians on a round Earth.


7184 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3745


  Reply # 2034371 12-Jun-2018 12:58
Send private message quote this post

I unset the "set answer" someone did - because it certainly was not an answer to the topic title.  Not even close.


1738 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 349

Trusted

  Reply # 2034548 12-Jun-2018 16:40
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

Batman:

 

 

 

Finding life on Mars, unless they break physics, won't change science or scientific facts.

 

Biblical god argument - life on Mars AFAIK doesn't contradict anything in the bible that should break theology. Wasn't there giants roaming on earth that were the product of gods and humans? They were wiped out by Noah's flood. That is as alien as it gets in this theology.

 

 

 

 

of course if they find God on Mars the S could hit the proverbial F tongue-out

 

 

Ironically, I'm currently reading a novel "Jesus On Mars", by Philip Jose Farmer ....

 

And yep, the proverbial S hit the fan ...





My thoughts are no longer my own and is probably representative of our media-controlled government


4952 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2009


  Reply # 2034561 12-Jun-2018 17:32
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

I'm writing (very slowly) a book in which the early stages of the story take place on Mars.

 

 

 

 





Mike

7184 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3745


  Reply # 2034641 12-Jun-2018 21:15
Send private message quote this post

MikeAqua:

 

I'm writing (very slowly) a book in which the early stages of the story take place on Mars.

 

 

Could the topic of this thread be a prequel?


Mad Scientist
18913 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2457

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2034644 12-Jun-2018 21:23
Send private message quote this post

Sorry for the spoiler but I've already seen the movie! It had Matt Damon in it.


1486 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 334


  Reply # 2034730 12-Jun-2018 23:29
Send private message quote this post

MikeAqua:

Fred99:


MikeAqua:


The best information we have suggests that life can arise in particular conditions that occur or have occurred on earth.  But ... we don't have direct evidence that life can spontaneously arise.



What do you mean?


Without direct observation of abiogenesis occuring in real time without influence of a creator in any way, creationists will always have a way out.  God could have always directed that particular cosmic ray or lightning bolt that sparked the reaction etc.


In total absence of evidence of any god, the evidence that we do have that life arose spontaneously on Earth is extremely compelling and is about as direct as we'll ever likely get.  Finding life elsewhere would just make the biblical god argument less believable than it already is.



I agree the evidence we have is compelling but it's circumstantial.  No-one has yet made life in experiments. 


I'm saying we could be wrong about life spontaneously arising on earth.  I don't think the theories of spontaneous development of life on earth are wrong, but I accept they could be. 


Alternate (and less likely) theories might include transport from another planet via natural processes (e.g. resting stages of bacteria transported in an icy meteor) or transplantation by intelligent extra terrestrial life forms (even less likely).


My views have nothing to do with any religious perspective, just a healthy scientific scepticism and general aversion to absolute facts.



I'm with you here. I have a healthy dose of scientific scepticism in my thinking also, along the lines of:

1. The highest form of intelligence scientifically proven to exist (humans) has not been able to fabricate or produce "life" therefore there must be by deduction a higher form of intelligence able to produce/fabricate/give life.

2. We as the highest form of scientifically observable intelligence are constrained to use dimensional analysis to observe phenomena, namely the space-time continuum, therefore one could conclude that the higher form of intelligence may not be measurable/observable in space-time to humans.

Best analogy I have here is the wind. You can not directly see the wind. You can use observation of influence on things you can see move or respond to it, to measure it. We have no way of directly quantifying the higher form of intelligence, but can accept it's existence by evidence of effect. (That life exists for starters, then that it's self sustaining, etc.).

Then you can start arguing about what life means I suppose...

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.