Its ok to suggest he has sex with his sub?
My reasoning is clear, I dont default to the standard bias. I look at it from an objective view, which is clearly not representative if there is a target. Both were wrong. One started it, one responded, both wrong. But its just a beatup for the usual standard reasons these days. If we all agree it is all speculation, I fail to see how the bias is so one sided. The default preference is to side with one guy and beat up the other, without hard facts. In any case, this was already decided before either of them said anything. The default reaction.
Which is worse in your eyes?
The guy who was actually involved in the rescue of the kids, telling the guy with good intentions who was clearly being a pest, to take his sub and shove it as it wasn't suited to purpose, or the guy who maybe had good intentions calling said guy, a person who sexually interferes with children?
I am sorry, but there is no defense for calling someone a pedophile, none. He automatically loses on that alone. I am actually pretty disappointed to see you try and defend it.
You aren't taking an objective view, you are taking the devils advocate position, which isn't in my opinion, even slightly appropriate.