Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7

gzt

10320 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1586


  Reply # 2067785 3-Aug-2018 20:41
One person supports this post
Send private message

Compulsory statistics survey: Would you participate or is it an intrusion?

It would not bother me. It is confidential anyway. I'm more annoyed at banks and other random institutions and their silly information demands tbh. This one would be time demanding tho and that would be annoying until I got over it..

gzt

10320 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1586


  Reply # 2067787 3-Aug-2018 20:42
Send private message

Geektastic: Why can't they move it to an online format so people can complete it when it suits?

Because they would be never? : )

 
 
 
 


12170 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3975

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2067790 3-Aug-2018 21:03
2 people support this post
Send private message

lapimate:

Geektastic: They can't access our property unless they trespass …


When under NZ law did it become "trespass" to approach someone's front door with an innocent purpose? I think not.



You can't approach our front door unless you breach the gates or climb the fence. The gates are electronic and cannot be manually opened.

A front door with no restrictions is an implied licence to approach. Restrictions revoke that licence implication.





12170 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3975

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2067818 3-Aug-2018 22:09
One person supports this post
Send private message

gzt:
Geektastic: Why can't they move it to an online format so people can complete it when it suits?

Because they would be never? : )


It works for the Census.





7603 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4023


  Reply # 2067828 3-Aug-2018 22:55
Send private message

Geektastic:
lapimate:

 

Geektastic: They can't access our property unless they trespass …

 

 

 

When under NZ law did it become "trespass" to approach someone's front door with an innocent purpose? I think not.

 



You can't approach our front door unless you breach the gates or climb the fence. The gates are electronic and cannot be manually opened.

A front door with no restrictions is an implied licence to approach. Restrictions revoke that licence implication.

 

In NZ they're not "trespassing" if they climb the fence.  Only if you after you warn them verbally or with a formal trespass notice, and they refuse to leave or come back, harm stock, leave an open gate closed or a closed gate open etc.


12170 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3975

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2067831 3-Aug-2018 23:17
Send private message

Fred99:

Geektastic:
lapimate:


Geektastic: They can't access our property unless they trespass …


 


When under NZ law did it become "trespass" to approach someone's front door with an innocent purpose? I think not.




You can't approach our front door unless you breach the gates or climb the fence. The gates are electronic and cannot be manually opened.

A front door with no restrictions is an implied licence to approach. Restrictions revoke that licence implication.


In NZ they're not "trespassing" if they climb the fence.  Only if you after you warn them verbally or with a formal trespass notice, and they refuse to leave or come back, harm stock, leave an open gate closed or a closed gate open etc.



Can you warn them before they commit the trespass, for example by notice at the boundary?

And are they liable for damage caused in gaining entry (notwithstanding those exercising statutory powers for example in responding to an emergency etc)?

This is among the writing on the subject I found

"Should a person enter private property if there is a sign saying "DO NOT ENTER" ?
Occupiers of private property are not under any obligation to make their property available in the ways described above. They are able to revoke the implied licence to enter. This could be done in a number of ways including putting up signs that say "do not enter" or by locking the gate to the property. If the occupier of a private property has revoked the implied licence to enter, ANYBODY (excluding an official with special authority) who does enter may be considered a trespasser (they may be on the property unlawfully)."





2603 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 364


  Reply # 2067924 4-Aug-2018 10:21
Send private message

Geektastic:
gzt:
Geektastic: Why can't they move it to an online format so people can complete it when it suits?

Because they would be never? : )


It works for the Census.


Worked but not well. The 2018 Census had lowest participation rate of last 5 Censuses. Regarded as a shambles

469 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 107


  Reply # 2067935 4-Aug-2018 11:31
6 people support this post
Send private message

TL;DR - Please please please do the surveys, they are incredibly valuable and Statistics New Zealand really does value the time and effort it takes respondents to complete them.

 

 

 

I may be unique in this thread in that I've been luck enough to actually use Statistics New Zealand (SNZ) micro-data for research projects (particularly HLFS) and collaborated very closely in the past, as an academic, with those who design, administer and maintain these surveys.  I for one am really appreciative of everyone who takes the time to complete their surveys and census, as are those who work at SNZ.

 

I know first hand that SNZ treats its ability to compel people into completing their surveys with the upmost of respect.  They genuinely believe that having such authority is a real privilege and it absolutely shapes their sense of responsibility to the respondents in return.  I would go so far as to say it's a part of their culture, almost a badge of honour.  I know of surveys that have been heavily modified, or had what would be really valuable questions straight out removed, in order to limit the burden on respondents.

 

As part of this social contract, any researcher who has collaborated with SNZ will know they are incredibly protective of their data, and treat its security as paramount.  The process to even get micro-data access to the data is lengthy and stringent, and then what you can even do with it is even more locked down.  It makes working with the data that much harder, but completely reasonable and understandable. They are also very good at reinforcing that they will happily throw the book at you if you breach the declaration of secrecy that you have to sign.


1759 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 900


  Reply # 2067960 4-Aug-2018 12:47
Send private message

k1wi:

 

TL;DR - Please please please do the surveys, they are incredibly valuable and Statistics New Zealand really does value the time and effort it takes respondents to complete them.

 

 

 

I may be unique in this thread in that I've been luck enough to actually use Statistics New Zealand (SNZ) micro-data for research projects (particularly HLFS) and collaborated very closely in the past, as an academic, with those who design, administer and maintain these surveys.  I for one am really appreciative of everyone who takes the time to complete their surveys and census, as are those who work at SNZ.

 

I know first hand that SNZ treats its ability to compel people into completing their surveys with the upmost of respect.  They genuinely believe that having such authority is a real privilege and it absolutely shapes their sense of responsibility to the respondents in return.  I would go so far as to say it's a part of their culture, almost a badge of honour.  I know of surveys that have been heavily modified, or had what would be really valuable questions straight out removed, in order to limit the burden on respondents.

 

As part of this social contract, any researcher who has collaborated with SNZ will know they are incredibly protective of their data, and treat its security as paramount.  The process to even get micro-data access to the data is lengthy and stringent, and then what you can even do with it is even more locked down.  It makes working with the data that much harder, but completely reasonable and understandable. They are also very good at reinforcing that they will happily throw the book at you if you breach the declaration of secrecy that you have to sign.

 

 

Totally agree with this post. 

 

It would be a good gesture from Stats to give the recipients a grocery voucher lets say $100 to complete the survery. 


12170 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3975

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2067961 4-Aug-2018 12:49
Send private message

Bung:
Geektastic:
gzt:
Geektastic: Why can't they move it to an online format so people can complete it when it suits?

Because they would be never? : )


It works for the Census.


Worked but not well. The 2018 Census had lowest participation rate of last 5 Censuses. Regarded as a shambles


Ah ok. Didn't know that.





4164 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 760

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2067962 4-Aug-2018 12:52
4 people support this post
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

alasta:

 

It seems strange that they won't disclose the exact nature of the questions until the interviewer visits. I would have thought it would be reasonable to expect that the participant should be given a list of questions in advance so that they can judge whether they consider them to be unreasonably invasive and, if so, seek legal advice on exactly what they're obligated to disclose. 

 

 

One does not need legal advice to answer these surveys. 

 

 

I'll judge that for myself, thanks very much.

 

All citizens have a reasonable expectation of the opportunity to seek legal advice when threatened with fines or imprisonment by a government agency. 


13612 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6373

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2067969 4-Aug-2018 13:40
Send private message

alasta:

 

MikeB4:

 

alasta:

 

It seems strange that they won't disclose the exact nature of the questions until the interviewer visits. I would have thought it would be reasonable to expect that the participant should be given a list of questions in advance so that they can judge whether they consider them to be unreasonably invasive and, if so, seek legal advice on exactly what they're obligated to disclose. 

 

 

One does not need legal advice to answer these surveys. 

 

 

I'll judge that for myself, thanks very much.

 

All citizens have a reasonable expectation of the opportunity to seek legal advice when threatened with fines or imprisonment by a government agency. 

 

 

We did a household census for around five years the only issue we had was they wanted to continue interview our son who was in the field doing pre-deployment training. It took awhile to convince the lady it was impossible unless she was prepared to go kilometers into the wilderness of Waiouru .

 

As for the questions asked you would have to give a lot more information when applying for a mortgage or a job 





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


Glurp
8751 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4027

Subscriber

  Reply # 2067980 4-Aug-2018 14:17
One person supports this post
Send private message

You can choose whether to apply for a mortgage or a particular job. You can't choose this.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


2490 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 684


  Reply # 2067981 4-Aug-2018 14:23
3 people support this post
Send private message

My last Job interview (successful) was less than 20 mins, and my CV details what I have done in my working career, NOT where I spend my money or how much I may have saved.

My last mortgage application took 1 hour, and definitely did want to know how much I earned and what assets I had available to service the debt with. Fair enough, I’m asking for half a million dollars and you need to know I’ll pay it back...

Neither of these came close to “2-3hours” and neither wanted me to prove my every statement with receipts from the last year, or preclude my lawyer going over the information they desired/required.

Bad analogy!

4164 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 760

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2067982 4-Aug-2018 14:24
Send private message

If the questions aren't excessively invasive then I wouldn't have a problem with it - unfortunately we don't know whether this is the case because the questions don't appear to be widely known.

 

For a few years now I have been participating in the NZ Attitudes and Values Study which is run by the department of psychology at the University of Auckland. Some of the questions are quite blunt but not particularly personal in nature - e.g. rating on a scale of 1 to 10 statements like 'I feel warmth towards Asians' or 'people should stop blaming others for their problems'. I have found it really interesting to engage with.

 

The only question in that study that I have refused to answer is one about 'sexual orientation', partly because it seems excessively personal, and partly because I don't really understand all that new age gobbledygook. 


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Geekzone Live »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.