Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | ... | 53
2151 posts

Uber Geek


  #2325419 26-Sep-2019 16:16
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

Rikkitic:

 

When discussing possible alternatives, there always seems to be an unspoken assumption that anything we choose must maintain or improve our current standard of living. But that may simply not be possible. If it becomes a matter of survival, maybe we will have to return to a peasant economy, with just a few essential machines. Maybe the majority of people, instead of a tiny fraction, will have to become involved in food production. Maybe we won't be able to have private cars anymore, regardless of how they are fueled. These things need to be at least taken into consideration.

 

 

 

 

I feel the vast majority of the population do not grasp the gravity of the situation the planet's people are is in.

 

 

Fixed.  The planet will recover in its own good time once we're all gone.





"I have noticed even people who claim everything is predestined, and that we can do nothing to change it, look before they cross the road." -  Stephen Hawking


22132 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2325420 26-Sep-2019 16:19
Send private message quote this post

floydbloke:

 

MikeB4:

 

Rikkitic:

 

When discussing possible alternatives, there always seems to be an unspoken assumption that anything we choose must maintain or improve our current standard of living. But that may simply not be possible. If it becomes a matter of survival, maybe we will have to return to a peasant economy, with just a few essential machines. Maybe the majority of people, instead of a tiny fraction, will have to become involved in food production. Maybe we won't be able to have private cars anymore, regardless of how they are fueled. These things need to be at least taken into consideration.

 

 

 

 

I feel the vast majority of the population do not grasp the gravity of the situation the planet's people are is in.

 

 

Fixed.  The planet will recover in its own good time once we're all gone.

 

 

Chances are, if we can't survive, then neither can MANY other species. Considering we are top of the food chain.


 
 
 
 


669 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #2325422 26-Sep-2019 16:28
Send private message quote this post

networkn:

 

Chances are, if we can't survive, then neither can MANY other species. Considering we are top of the food chain.

 

 

I'm sure there are some nice single-cell organisms that might appreciate the real estate when 99% of species get wiped out, and evolve into a bunch of amphibian-people or fish-people in a couple of million years.


9667 posts

Uber Geek


  #2325451 26-Sep-2019 17:30
3 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

ShinyChrome:

 

networkn:

 

Chances are, if we can't survive, then neither can MANY other species. Considering we are top of the food chain.

 

 

I'm sure there are some nice single-cell organisms that might appreciate the real estate when 99% of species get wiped out, and evolve into a bunch of amphibian-people or fish-people in a couple of million years.

 

 

That actually took quite a few hundred million years, was only partly successful - at least apparently from looking at the remaining reptilian mentality of some humans.


3945 posts

Uber Geek


  #2325452 26-Sep-2019 17:35
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek: What has been designed uses spent uranium.


Bill Gates's Experimental Nuclear Power Plant Halts Construction in China

Gates cites the Trump Administration's aggressive stance for having to pull out.

...Pulling out of the project leaves TerraPower's future uncertain. According to company CEO Chris Levesque, speaking to the Wall Street Journal, the price of a demonstration reactor is around $1 billion. Having to cancel a project worth such an extraordinary amount would likely be the death knell for most new players in any field. Most new players, however, aren't funded by Bill Gates—still valued by Forbes to have a fortune north of $93 billion.

In his letter, Gates notes that the company "may be able to build ... in the United States" under certain funding and regulatory conditions. He also announced that he would be taking up the mantle of nuclear energy in a more public way this year in actions unaffiliated with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

"Nuclear is ideal for dealing with climate change," Gates says in his letter, "because it is the only carbon-free, scalable energy source that’s available 24 hours a day." He adds that "problems with today’s reactors, such as the risk of accidents, can be solved through innovation."

For now, though, TerraPower's technology looks like it may have to start from scratch.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a25728221/terrapower-china-bill-gates-trump/

19845 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2325475 26-Sep-2019 18:08
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

Rikkitic:

 

When discussing possible alternatives, there always seems to be an unspoken assumption that anything we choose must maintain or improve our current standard of living. But that may simply not be possible. If it becomes a matter of survival, maybe we will have to return to a peasant economy, with just a few essential machines. Maybe the majority of people, instead of a tiny fraction, will have to become involved in food production. Maybe we won't be able to have private cars anymore, regardless of how they are fueled. These things need to be at least taken into consideration.

 

 

 

 

I feel the vast majority of the population do not grasp the gravity of the situation the planet is in.

 

 

Hence my suggestion that a cleaner and safer 2018 Nuclear reactor solution makes a whole lot of sense. Waiting decades and decades for an alternative to replace FF, and FF have been super awesome as a plentiful energy supply, is shocking. Time is either already up, or near up. I recall that while the Industrial Revolution started all this, it has doubled since 1980. 40 years. What about the next 40 years where we all know, little will be achieved. 


19845 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2325476 26-Sep-2019 18:09
Send private message quote this post

floydbloke:

 

MikeB4:

 

Rikkitic:

 

When discussing possible alternatives, there always seems to be an unspoken assumption that anything we choose must maintain or improve our current standard of living. But that may simply not be possible. If it becomes a matter of survival, maybe we will have to return to a peasant economy, with just a few essential machines. Maybe the majority of people, instead of a tiny fraction, will have to become involved in food production. Maybe we won't be able to have private cars anymore, regardless of how they are fueled. These things need to be at least taken into consideration.

 

 

 

 

I feel the vast majority of the population do not grasp the gravity of the situation the planet's people are is in.

 

 

Fixed.  The planet will recover in its own good time once we're all gone.

 

 

It will, nothing is more certain.


 
 
 
 


19845 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2325480 26-Sep-2019 18:15
Send private message quote this post

networkn:

 

floydbloke:

 

MikeB4:

 

Rikkitic:

 

When discussing possible alternatives, there always seems to be an unspoken assumption that anything we choose must maintain or improve our current standard of living. But that may simply not be possible. If it becomes a matter of survival, maybe we will have to return to a peasant economy, with just a few essential machines. Maybe the majority of people, instead of a tiny fraction, will have to become involved in food production. Maybe we won't be able to have private cars anymore, regardless of how they are fueled. These things need to be at least taken into consideration.

 

 

 

 

I feel the vast majority of the population do not grasp the gravity of the situation the planet's people are is in.

 

 

Fixed.  The planet will recover in its own good time once we're all gone.

 

 

Chances are, if we can't survive, then neither can MANY other species. Considering we are top of the food chain.

 

 

Im not sure about that. There have already been a few extinction events. The last was 67 million years ago, the meteor that hit Yucatan vaporised everything in a  wide radius. The rest died as the planet was covered in smoke and oracles, plant life died along with animals. Except in the sea and underground.  Thats vastly more serious than 6C above average which will deal to us. All life adapts, but we cant as its too fast. 


19845 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2325482 26-Sep-2019 18:17
Send private message quote this post

ShinyChrome:

 

networkn:

 

Chances are, if we can't survive, then neither can MANY other species. Considering we are top of the food chain.

 

 

I'm sure there are some nice single-cell organisms that might appreciate the real estate when 99% of species get wiped out, and evolve into a bunch of amphibian-people or fish-people in a couple of million years.

 

 

I think the last episode, which is the last extinction of 3 or 4, wiped out 95% max. It all came back. It didn't last time which was more serious go back that far. 


19845 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2325483 26-Sep-2019 18:23
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

kingdragonfly:
tdgeek: What has been designed uses spent uranium.


Bill Gates's Experimental Nuclear Power Plant Halts Construction in China

Gates cites the Trump Administration's aggressive stance for having to pull out.

...Pulling out of the project leaves TerraPower's future uncertain. According to company CEO Chris Levesque, speaking to the Wall Street Journal, the price of a demonstration reactor is around $1 billion. Having to cancel a project worth such an extraordinary amount would likely be the death knell for most new players in any field. Most new players, however, aren't funded by Bill Gates—still valued by Forbes to have a fortune north of $93 billion.

In his letter, Gates notes that the company "may be able to build ... in the United States" under certain funding and regulatory conditions. He also announced that he would be taking up the mantle of nuclear energy in a more public way this year in actions unaffiliated with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

"Nuclear is ideal for dealing with climate change," Gates says in his letter, "because it is the only carbon-free, scalable energy source that’s available 24 hours a day." He adds that "problems with today’s reactors, such as the risk of accidents, can be solved through innovation."

For now, though, TerraPower's technology looks like it may have to start from scratch.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a25728221/terrapower-china-bill-gates-trump/

 

On the surface it looks awesome. If anyone can cast aside the anti nuclear, Hiroshima, Chernobyl mentality, this solution has it all. It can even convert the waste that is stored in a dinky town in Kentucky into power that will run NYC for 150 years. Like the modern aircraft which is super safe, it can fail. But the failures of the past cannot be extrapolated to this design. How long does it take to commission a reactor? 5 years? Theoretically, you could replace all FF in 5 years. This is a climate change thread, do the math. Is it a risk? Yes. What is the other option? 100% we are screwed by CC . 


5139 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #2325489 26-Sep-2019 18:32
2 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

I've done the one most significant thing to slow global warming. No kids.


19845 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2325497 26-Sep-2019 18:47
3 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

DarthKermit:

 

I've done the one most significant thing to slow global warming. No kids.

 

 

I wish you were Fred Trump


4222 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #2325694 27-Sep-2019 08:22
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

DarthKermit:

I've done the one most significant thing to slow global warming. No kids.



Wow. I guess you must be serious about this stuff then. To go against the primary drive of all living things to procreate and continue their branch of the species. Can I assume then that the resources you would have put into raising a family will go towards combatting global warming? Roughly half a mill per child.
And that you are foregoing imported goods, anything that is petroleum based or mined. That you will be walking to your job at a business that produces no emissions. That all the food you eat is locally grown plants.

Or is it just a convenient excuse for the very personal decision you have made not have children. A choice that is nobody's business but yours.

A quote I like from this week is
"Rich people are looking at the end of the world, poor people are looking at the end of the month."




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

9667 posts

Uber Geek


  #2325698 27-Sep-2019 08:35
Send private message quote this post

Dingbatt:

 

Wow. I guess you must be serious about this stuff then. To go against the primary drive of all living things to procreate and continue their branch of the species.

 

Not "all living things" need to reproduce in order to benefit the survival of their genes - look at a beehive. (Or from a human civilization perspective competing for  resources - an army).

 

 


4222 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #2325702 27-Sep-2019 08:42
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Fred99:

Dingbatt:


Wow. I guess you must be serious about this stuff then. To go against the primary drive of all living things to procreate and continue their branch of the species.


Not "all living things" need to reproduce in order to benefit the survival of their genes - look at a beehive. (Or from a human civilization perspective competing for  resources - an army).


 



Sorry, so are you suggesting that anyone who decides to not have children is a drone?




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

1 | ... | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | ... | 53
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

New online learning platform for kids stuck at home during COVID-19 lockdown
Posted 26-Mar-2020 21:35


New 5G Nokia smartphone unveiled as portfolio expands
Posted 26-Mar-2020 17:11


D-Link ANZ launches wireless AC1200 4G LTE router
Posted 26-Mar-2020 16:32


Ring introduces two new video doorbells and new pre-roll technology
Posted 17-Mar-2020 16:59


OPPO uncovers flagship Find X2 Pro smartphone
Posted 17-Mar-2020 16:54


D-Link COVR-2202 mesh Wi-Fi system now protected by McAfee
Posted 17-Mar-2020 16:00


Spark Sport opens its platform up to all New Zealanders at no charge
Posted 17-Mar-2020 10:04


Spark launches 5G Starter Fund
Posted 8-Mar-2020 19:19


TRENDnet launches high-performance WiFi Mesh Router System
Posted 5-Mar-2020 08:48


Sony boosts full-frame lens line-up with introduction of FE 20mm F1.8 G large-aperture ultra-wide-angle prime Lens
Posted 5-Mar-2020 08:44


Vector and Spark teamed up on smart metering initiative
Posted 5-Mar-2020 08:42


Schneider Electric launches new PDL Pro Series designed specifically for the commercial building market
Posted 5-Mar-2020 08:39


Kiwi app Pedigree DentaStix Studios uses pet images to counter impact of negative social media Content
Posted 5-Mar-2020 08:32


Samsung expands to New Zealand in 5G Networks Deal with Spark
Posted 5-Mar-2020 08:17


New Vodafone mobile data plans with unlimited data
Posted 26-Feb-2020 06:55



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.