Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.

3383 posts

Uber Geek


# 258694 16-Oct-2019 10:00
Send private message quote this post

I'm curious about current seatbelt law in NZ.  I'm solely interested in the law and not debates on what is " international best practice" etc


Looking here:


It says:



From 8th birthday to 14 years old Must use safety belts if available. If not available, they must travel in the back seat. Over 14 years old Must use safety belts where they are available.



This seems to suggest that children only need to use safety belts "where they are available" - but what does this mean? As a kid it wasn't unusual to ride in the back tray of a ute with no seatbelt or boot of a station wagon.  Does this cover this wording cover these scenarios?


What about vans which I don't think legally have to have seatbelts in every seat? Can people ride without seatbelts in the seats of a van which don't have seatbelts?  What about motorhomes? Buses obviously don't legally have to have seatbelts in every seat, but when does a van become a bus?


What about scenarios where I'm giving friends a ride in my car and we end up with four people on the backseat.  Can one person forgo wearing a seatbelt because it's "not available"?




The roadcode is slightly less ambiguous with regards to children:



Children aged eight to 14 must wear a safety belt.


Passengers 15 years and over are responsible for making sure that they wear their own safety belts correctly and that they keep them fastened while the vehicle is in motion.



But still doesn't cover scenarios where seatbelts "aren't available" and doesn't say that much about adults other than people over 15 must ensure their own seatbelts are worn correctly.


It also has the following even more confusing statement:



Never put an adult and a child together in the same safety belt.



Which almost seems (by omission) to suggest that 2 adults or 2 children could share the same safety belt in scenarios where there isn't 1 seatbelt for every passenger?



Create new topic
22878 posts

Uber Geek


  # 2337971 16-Oct-2019 10:02
2 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

If there is no belt in the back of the 50s car they are in, they dont have to wear one is what they are saying. Seatbelts are only required after some year that is so long ago it doesnt matter now except for classic and vintage cars. Which you wouldnt want a child in to mess it up anyway.


1301 posts

Uber Geek

  # 2341129 20-Oct-2019 20:54
Send private message quote this post

RUR part 7.1

A person must not ride in or on a vehicle, or in or on an object conveyed on a vehicle, in a manner or position that may be liable to cause injury to that person

That rather open-to-interpretation statement I think is what covers the not floating around in a ute tray type of deal. Part 7 is what defines all the seatbelt wearing rules

James Sleeman
I sell lots of stuff for electronic enthusiasts...


3239 posts

Uber Geek

  # 2341183 21-Oct-2019 08:47
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

I think you are over analysing something quite basic. The exemption is there because there are some older cars and some categories of vehicles that are not required to have seatbelts in all seated positions. The other part is quite clearly to prevent 2 people using a single seatbelt, which I thought would have been quite obvious. I think it's quite clear personally.

Always be yourself, unless you can be Batman, then always be the Batman

Create new topic

Twitter and LinkedIn »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:

News »

Vodafone integrates eSIM into device and wearable roadmap
Posted 17-Jan-2020 09:45

Do you need this camera app? Group investigates privacy implications
Posted 16-Jan-2020 03:30

JBL launches headphones range designed for gaming
Posted 13-Jan-2020 09:59

Withings introduces ScanWatch wearable combining ECG and sleep apnea detection
Posted 9-Jan-2020 18:34

NZ Police releases public app
Posted 8-Jan-2020 11:43

Suunto 7 combine sports and smart features on new smartwatch generation
Posted 7-Jan-2020 16:06

Intel brings innovation with technology spanning the cloud, network, edge and PC
Posted 7-Jan-2020 15:54

AMD announces high performance desktop and ultrathin laptop processors
Posted 7-Jan-2020 15:42

AMD unveils four new desktop and mobile GPUs including AMD Radeon RX 5600
Posted 7-Jan-2020 15:32

Consolidation in video streaming market with Spark selling Lightbox to Sky
Posted 19-Dec-2019 09:09

Intel introduces cryogenic control chip to enable quantum computers
Posted 10-Dec-2019 21:32

Vodafone 5G service live in four cities
Posted 10-Dec-2019 08:30

Samsung Galaxy Fold now available in New Zealand
Posted 6-Dec-2019 00:01

NZ company oDocs awarded US$ 100,000 Dubai World Expo grant
Posted 5-Dec-2019 16:00

New Zealand Rugby Selects AWS-Powered Analytics for Deeper Game Insights
Posted 5-Dec-2019 11:33

Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.