Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
450 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 314127 2-Apr-2010 11:37
Send private message

freitasm: Stalin, let me see... Isn't this one that paranoid schizofrenic guy with a big moustache with a pechant to killing even the closest people to him? Yes, thought so.

And Karl Marx? Oh, right "Workers of the world, unite!"... Sure, right.



As oppose to to the champions of capitalism? Lest us not forget who dropped the atomic bomb, because it sure wasn't a communist...

424 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 2


  Reply # 314131 2-Apr-2010 12:00
Send private message

MikeyPI:
freitasm: Stalin, let me see... Isn't this one that paranoid schizofrenic guy with a big moustache with a pechant to killing even the closest people to him? Yes, thought so.

And Karl Marx? Oh, right "Workers of the world, unite!"... Sure, right.



As oppose to to the champions of capitalism? Lest us not forget who dropped the atomic bomb, because it sure wasn't a communist...


And the Russians were perfect?  How many of their own country did they kill after WW2?  My uncle was a British radio operator after WW2, he said how he heard messages related to Russians shooting down DC3's carrying refugees back to Russia.

BDFL - Memuneh
61333 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12080

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 314133 2-Apr-2010 12:07
Send private message

MikeyPI:
freitasm: Stalin, let me see... Isn't this one that paranoid schizofrenic guy with a big moustache with a pechant to killing even the closest people to him? Yes, thought so.

And Karl Marx? Oh, right "Workers of the world, unite!"... Sure, right.



As oppose to to the champions of?capitalism? Lest us not forget who dropped the atomic bomb,?because?it sure?wasn't?a communist...


I didn't discuss or touch ideologies, only the specific names brought into the topic.




85 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 8


  Reply # 314158 2-Apr-2010 13:50
Send private message

Talk about some OT talk... but I digress. In my view there is nothing wrong with executives pay being high as long as they contribute accordingly to company performance (in the medium rather than the short term). However, on that measure, most senior executives in NZ listed companies would be unbelievably overpaid. That fault lies with company directors who authorise such salaries for CEOs and senior management. Pay people what they are worth, but it seems we are a little too quick to think people are worth more than they are. Its all about results.

6434 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1571


  Reply # 314165 2-Apr-2010 14:37
Send private message

one thing to remember when looking at exec remuneration is that usually only a relatively small portion of the pay is cash.

Usually a significant portion of it will be shares or options - which, by definition, only remain valuable as long as the share price does well.

If the company is doing well, and the exec is creating shareholder value, then he deserves to be paid accordingly.
If the companies share price is tanking, then usually any options awarded become worthless, and shares awarded become worth much less too.

8027 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 387

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 314320 3-Apr-2010 00:10
Send private message

Depends on how you measure value, if you consider the value to society rather than just ROI to investors of whatever company you'll find the highest paid jobs actually destroy the most value.

178 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  Reply # 314328 3-Apr-2010 01:04
Send private message

freitasm: Stalin, let me see... Isn't this one that paranoid schizofrenic guy with a big moustache with a pechant to killing even the closest people to him? Yes, thought so.

And Karl Marx? Oh, right "Workers of the world, unite!"... Sure, right.



Haha, next you'll be telling me we should discount the works of John Nash in mathematics because he had schizophrenia. Stalin certainly was crazy as a bat. Still, his industrialization efforts in the 1920s are still studied in sociology and economics courses today. Karl Marx was quite brilliant. We base economic principles of management on his work. Contrary to popular belief, he didn't despise rigid class stratification. He was rather neutral. Surely you gleaned more than "workers of the world, unite" from reading about him? How do you feel about his bourgeoisie/proletariat works?

Personally, I think this has been hashed out too many times already. People will choose to sit either side of the fence. We see the Democrats/Conservatives in the states; National/Labour here. It's the never-ending struggle between an anarcho-libertarian ideology, and socialism. There's no "right" answer. Functional modern democracies sit somewhere in the middle.

85 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 8


  Reply # 314344 3-Apr-2010 08:47
Send private message

Ragnor: Depends on how you measure value, if you consider the value to society rather than just ROI to investors of whatever company you'll find the highest paid jobs actually destroy the most value.


Perhaps but I dont see people investing in companies 'for the good of society'.  Executives are nothing more than the employees of the managers (directors) of a company.  Their job is to act in the best interests of the shareholders (not society) - admittedly a number tend to forget this.

732 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  Reply # 314352 3-Apr-2010 11:06
Send private message

They need to give some that money back into there staff. Why only CEO get all the money yes he run the campany but all the staff do too. And the staff will stay longer too.




               The Biggest and the Best.

229 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  Reply # 314385 3-Apr-2010 14:17
Send private message


SteveON: Even more silly is the people who voted, I am not sure if people understand but if you pay peanuts for a top exe or CEO; you might as well get a farmer to run our top companies.

Level of ignorance is amazing. Assuming you've never been out of the city.

6434 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1571


  Reply # 314511 3-Apr-2010 23:24
Send private message

cws82us: They need to give some that money back into there staff. Why only CEO get all the money yes he run the campany but all the staff do too. And the staff will stay longer too.


were you thinking of any company in particular when you came up with this?

most CEOs that get multimillion dollar salaries are CEOs of companies that employ thousands, if not tens of thousands of people.  to cap their salary at, say, $500k,  and give the rest to their staff would see their staff get paid an extra few dollars per year.  It wouldn't even be noticable in their fortnightly paycheck.


453 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 27


  Reply # 314558 4-Apr-2010 08:25
Send private message

I think what people need to consider before stating off hand whether a top exec earns a mutlit million salary is what they do and what they're responsible for. As a guesstimate it would be fair to say 90% of the people voting really have no idea what a CEO is responsible for.

In all fairness, there are a number of execs that do not deserve the salaries that they are getting. However it is up to that company to curb that, and not something that should be regulated. If it were, at what point? If I own my company, are you saying I can only pay myself a certain amount per year? And if that's exempt, why would anyone ever want to run a large company.

If you're not happy with it, buy some shares and vote. If you don't want to buy shares, don't buy there products. If you don't want to do either of those, shut up!

We live in a capitalistic democratic society. There are plenty of ways to have your say if you truly want to. But if you're gonna sit on the sidelines, don't be surprised when it doesn't go your way.


1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.