![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
hio77: worth the hope the chorus looks into vdsl vectoring?
hio77:stevehodge:hio77:
it just seems like an utter waste.. could easily get far more upstream or downstream with changes to limits or ranges...
Yes, as I said we could easily get 70/70 with the current band setup I think. Or 100/50 with some careful band selection.
might be asking a bit much of vdsl, or atlest attention will shine through if things were set that high.. worth the hope the chorus looks into vdsl vectoring?
http://www.tmcnet.com/voip/departments/articles/319258-vdsl2-vectoring-next-thing-copper-access.htm
http://www.gazettabyte.com/home/2012/11/9/vdsl2-vectoring-explained.html
maybe once telecom start selling vdsl there might be more of a push to improve profiles and all..
eXDee:hio77:stevehodge:hio77:
it just seems like an utter waste.. could easily get far more upstream or downstream with changes to limits or ranges...
Yes, as I said we could easily get 70/70 with the current band setup I think. Or 100/50 with some careful band selection.
might be asking a bit much of vdsl, or atlest attention will shine through if things were set that high.. worth the hope the chorus looks into vdsl vectoring?
http://www.tmcnet.com/voip/departments/articles/319258-vdsl2-vectoring-next-thing-copper-access.htm
http://www.gazettabyte.com/home/2012/11/9/vdsl2-vectoring-explained.html
maybe once telecom start selling vdsl there might be more of a push to improve profiles and all..
I can't see them investing in copper any further tbh. Perhaps if the government in australia changes, their NBN might drop to a FTTN setup with the potential for newer impreovements on VDSL technologies like this.
From a quick skim, it appears that it would require new hardware?
SamF:hio77: worth the hope the chorus looks into vdsl vectoring?
More likely they're putting all their future efforts into fibre I'd say...
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
hio77:stevehodge:hio77:
it just seems like an utter waste.. could easily get far more upstream or downstream with changes to limits or ranges...
Yes, as I said we could easily get 70/70 with the current band setup I think. Or 100/50 with some careful band selection.
might be asking a bit much of vdsl, or atlest attention will shine through if things were set that high.. worth the hope the chorus looks into vdsl vectoring?
so thats a prettmuch full DS/US graph then.. the gaps are crazy!
hio77:SamF: Maybe it would create too much crosstalk?
isnt this also why 17a isnt widely used at distance?
"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there." | Octopus Energy | Sharesies
- Richard Feynman
"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there." | Octopus Energy | Sharesies
- Richard Feynman
JamesL:
Total time = 13 hours 10 min 51 sec
FEC: 0 0
CRC: 1423 0
ES: 62 3
SES: 5 0
UAS: 464 464
LOS: 4 0
LOF: 5 0
"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there." | Octopus Energy | Sharesies
- Richard Feynman
sidefx: Argh! The errors on my line got even worse overnight last night, and it looks like it bumped me to DLM4 this morning. I've been racking my brain but can't think of anything that's changed in our house that might cause this... very annoying though:
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there." | Octopus Energy | Sharesies
- Richard Feynman
sidefx: I did wonder about rain but it's been running for months with no issues (my VDSL anniversary is coming up next month I think, lol) so it's strange that it would just start like that.
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |