Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
26468 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6021

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 777894 11-Mar-2013 11:43
Send private message

You haven't said anything about your ISP, connection type or your methodology used for testing.

Assuming it's TCP testing with with PPPoE your connection is basically 100% perfect and you're getting exactly what you're supposed to.


3395 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 397

Trusted

  Reply # 777897 11-Mar-2013 11:49
Send private message

gustov: Steve, I found your reply very useful.

I had one of the first UFB residential installs in Grey Lynn, Auckland, last July 2012 after being approached by my ISP to switch from ADSL to UFB. I signed up for the 30/10 package but for the first few months enjoyed 64/32. My ISP said this was because Chorus was not throttling speeds at that early stage, so I should not to expect it to last.

It has been apparent for the last four months that I am now well and truly on the 30/10 plan I am charged for, excepting that I never get more than 27/8. (plus or minus 1Mbps)

Can I ask for your technical advice please about how I might go about encouraging my ISP to give me the full 30/10 I am paying for? Is there something they should be doing, that they aren't doing?

I know those readers hanging out for UFB might say I am being picky, but this speed difference is 10-20% slower than what my ISP advertises, and charges me for. What concerns me is that at such an early stage of the UFB rollout across the country that already speed is being throttled below that advertised to encourage new sign-ups, and if ISP's are doing this now, then it does not bode well for the future either.

When I first raised this speed shortfall with my ISP they showed little interest and even said that Chorus only guarantee a UFB speed of 2.5Mbps anyway! (in other words: I should be happy with anything faster than 2.5Mbps). They also tried to shift the responsibility to Chorus.

Steve, I would appreciate your thoughts on this issue. Is there anything I can raise with my ISP that will "encourage" them to deliver 30/10? Why do you think they are not delivering the full 30/10?

I am certain that if I said I wanted to stump up with another $30 a month for the full 100/50 plan that my speeds would increase overnight! But right now all I want is the 30/10 I am being charged for and know from my first few months experience, is deliverable.




You are almost certainly getting a true 30/10mbps service at that speed as I presume you are testing with Speedtest (or something to that degree) which uses TCp and only a few connections. The packet overhead and other TCP overheads are the difference you see. If you tried a straight UDP stream I could almost guarantee you would get 30/10.





122 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 32


  Reply # 777906 11-Mar-2013 12:01
Send private message

gustov:
It has been apparent for the last four months that I am now well and truly on the 30/10 plan I am charged for, excepting that I never get more than 27/8. (plus or minus 1Mbps)

Can I ask for your technical advice please about how I might go about encouraging my ISP to give me the full 30/10 I am paying for? Is there something they should be doing, that they aren't doing?

I know those readers hanging out for UFB might say I am being picky, but this speed difference is 10-20% slower than what my ISP advertises, and charges me for. What concerns me is that at such an early stage of the UFB rollout across the country that already speed is being throttled below that advertised to encourage new sign-ups, and if ISP's are doing this now, then it does not bode well for the future either.

When I first raised this speed shortfall with my ISP they showed little interest and even said that Chorus only guarantee a UFB speed of 2.5Mbps anyway! (in other words: I should be happy with anything faster than 2.5Mbps). They also tried to shift the responsibility to Chorus.

Steve, I would appreciate your thoughts on this issue. Is there anything I can raise with my ISP that will "encourage" them to deliver 30/10? Why do you think they are not delivering the full 30/10?

I am certain that if I said I wanted to stump up with another $30 a month for the full 100/50 plan that my speeds would increase overnight! But right now all I want is the 30/10 I am being charged for and know from my first few months experience, is deliverable.



I'd be interested to know how you are testing the speed. The 30/10 refers to the layer 2 performance provided by Chorus or the LFC. So the layer 3 header packets etc. count as part of your bandwidth and the size of the packets that you use (Mtu of 66 bytes versus 1500) will affect the speed. Many testing programs only measure the volume of the payload within the layer 3 packet and does not include the IP header etc in the calcs.

The takeway from this is that you won't get 30/10 unless you have a sophisticated testing tools to measure it and FYI I don't have any way to do this from my home, so the 27/8 is looking pretty good. You might be able to squeeze a litle more from it if you optimise you setup.

120 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 9


  Reply # 777923 11-Mar-2013 12:31
Send private message

Thanks to everyone for the prompt replies - you all tell me that my speed is in fact OK and I am getting what I should. That's the reassurance I wish my ISP had given me.

Yes I was using "Speedtest" and also my own ISP's online speed test programme to measure my speed.

Once again I've learnt something from this group.

Incidentally, in this morning's "NZ Herald" there is a very interesting lengthy article on the uptake of UFB in New Zealand. I found this sentence interesting as I though uptake might have been higher:

"But, from the start of this year, 3806 users of 134,912 able to connect under the UFB scheme had fibre."

Full article here:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10870413



4317 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1718


  Reply # 778382 12-Mar-2013 10:09
Send private message

Thanks for the useful info guys.  I live in Nelson and currently use Telecom as my ISP.  I'm confident telecom are the choke point, because broadband speed is so variable at our place, and that variability corresponds to what you might describe as a peak off peak cycle.  am Sunday morning is fantastic but 7:30pm on a weeknight its hopeless - even on simple text based web pages.

I'm a little confused by the 'won't use copper' comment.  As I understand it the UFB cabling is in for our neighborhood, but none was installed in our street, only down the adjacent main road.







Mike

3395 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 397

Trusted

  Reply # 778388 12-Mar-2013 10:31
Send private message

MikeAqua: Thanks for the useful info guys.  I live in Nelson and currently use Telecom as my ISP.  I'm confident telecom are the choke point, because broadband speed is so variable at our place, and that variability corresponds to what you might describe as a peak off peak cycle.  am Sunday morning is fantastic but 7:30pm on a weeknight its hopeless - even on simple text based web pages.

I'm a little confused by the 'won't use copper' comment.  As I understand it the UFB cabling is in for our neighborhood, but none was installed in our street, only down the adjacent main road.



Telecom won't be the choke point here but rather it will be that you are on an old ATM based connection with Chorus (ADSL1) with limited backhaul. Search Conklin on this forum. Changing ISPs won't help you but UFB definitely would, no matter the ISP.





26468 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6021

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 778389 12-Mar-2013 10:31
Send private message

gustov:
Incidentally, in this morning's "NZ Herald" there is a very interesting lengthy article on the uptake of UFB in New Zealand. I found this sentence interesting as I though uptake might have been higher:

"But, from the start of this year, 3806 users of 134,912 able to connect under the UFB scheme had fibre." 



The figures shouldn't surprise anybody. Out of NZ's top 5 ISP's only Orcon is offering UFB services and Callplus/Singslot currently only trialling business users. Once the big 2/3 (Vodafone/TelstraClear and Telecom) start offering UFB you'll probably see things change.


120 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 9


  Reply # 778435 12-Mar-2013 11:11
Send private message

  Once the big 2/3 (Vodafone/TelstraClear and Telecom) start offering UFB you'll probably see things change.


Why have the big ISP's be so slow to offer UFB?

26468 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6021

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 778561 12-Mar-2013 14:42
Send private message

gustov:
  Once the big 2/3 (Vodafone/TelstraClear and Telecom) start offering UFB you'll probably see things change.


Why have the big ISP's be so slow to offer UFB?


To save spending 45 minutes writing what has been discussed in numerous other threads on here I'll answer that with one simple answer "because".

Fibre is an incredibly complex beast with a large number of unknowns. It's a massive project offering UFB connections.

420 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 83

Trusted
Chorus NZ

  Reply # 782642 16-Mar-2013 12:32
Send private message

MikeAqua: Thanks for the useful info guys.  I live in Nelson and currently use Telecom as my ISP.  I'm confident telecom are the choke point, because broadband speed is so variable at our place, and that variability corresponds to what you might describe as a peak off peak cycle.  am Sunday morning is fantastic but 7:30pm on a weeknight its hopeless - even on simple text based web pages.

I'm a little confused by the 'won't use copper' comment.  As I understand it the UFB cabling is in for our neighborhood, but none was installed in our street, only down the adjacent main road.


What is your street name?

Talk DIrtY to me
4281 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2296

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 782661 16-Mar-2013 13:29
Send private message

MikeAqua: I'm a little confused by the 'won't use copper' comment.  As I understand it the UFB cabling is in for our neighborhood, but none was installed in our street, only down the adjacent main road.


So they did not install any of these green pillars in your street?




Whatifthespacekeyhadneverbeeninvented?


808 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 206

Subscriber

  Reply # 782806 16-Mar-2013 23:03
Send private message

MikeAqua: <snip> I'm a little confused by the 'won't use copper' comment.  As I understand it the UFB cabling is in for our neighborhood, but none was installed in our street, only down the adjacent main road.


There is no copper cableing in the UFB network - it is all fibre (except for some copper in the house cables).

There dosent have to be UFB 'ducting' installed in your street for you to have acces to the UFB system.

The green (as used by chorus) microducting system is only installed down street where there isnt an existing pit & pipe ducting system  - if there is an existing ducting system then a fibre cable is pulled through this to your house from a fibre terminal, installed in a special pit on these system (on average 1 terminal per 24 houses)

If you dont have the grey terminals at about every 2nd boundary but an oval shaped bit about every 4-6 houses then your likely to be connected to an exisiting pit&pipe duct system

1984 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 133

Trusted

  Reply # 783064 17-Mar-2013 18:57
Send private message

sbiddle:
timmmay: I upload 5-15GB per week during summer, by FTP 3-5 connections at once, to my editor in the US. Right now I'm on 2Mbps up TC cable, and I get the full 2Mbps. If I get UFB am I likely to get the full 10Mbps up?

Also is there scope for the connections to upgrade to 1Gbps later? I can't see any real need for it right now, but limiting to 100Mbps seems a little short sighted.


You can sign up for 1Gbps now if you want a P2P connection.

The 100/50Mbps limits at present exists so there is no contention on the 24 way GPON split as GPON can only deliver 2.4Gbps down and 1.2Gbps up.

It's inevitable that the GPON spec will eventually be upgraded to support faster than 2.4Gbps.


There should be 10GPON gear available now but its early days and Chorus won't be interested for a long time because there would be no reason and no demand and not enough backhaul. Point to point Ethernet should be available on UFB now up to 10 gigabit. If 100 gigabit becomes common at some point in the future then today's UFB fibre will be totally compatible. Thats the thing about "Single Mode" fibre that is used for GPON.




Qualified in business, certified in fibre, stuck in copper, have to keep going  ^_^

275 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 27


  Reply # 783340 18-Mar-2013 11:21
One person supports this post
Send private message

@InstallerUFB,

What will happen after the UFB network is rolled out in a suburb with every 24 houses connected to a optical splitter, then someone sub-divides an existing section and a new house is built and wants a UFB hookup?

"Sorry the cabinet is full"?




3535 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2042

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 783342 18-Mar-2013 11:30
Send private message

Publius: @InstallerUFB,

What will happen after the UFB network is rolled out in a suburb with every 24 houses connected to a optical splitter, then someone sub-divides an existing section and a new house is built and wants a UFB hookup?

"Sorry the cabinet is full"?


Interesting question... It's worth noting that the 24 way split is a policy, not a technical, limitation. There are options to split 32 or even 64 ways I believe. I'm not sure of the level of optical rework required to change it though.

Cheers - N


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34


Enable doubles fibre broadband speeds for its most popular wholesale service in Christchurch
Posted 2-Jun-2018 20:07


All or Nothing: New Zealand All Blacks arrives on Amazon Prime Video
Posted 2-Jun-2018 16:21


Innovation Grant, High Tech Awards and new USA office for Kiwi tech company SwipedOn
Posted 1-Jun-2018 20:54


Commerce Commission warns Apple for misleading consumers about their rights
Posted 30-May-2018 13:15


IBM leads Call for Code to use cloud, data, AI, blockchain for natural disaster relief
Posted 25-May-2018 14:12


New FUJIFILM X-T100 aims to do better job than smartphones
Posted 24-May-2018 20:17


Stuff takes 100% ownership of Stuff Fibre
Posted 24-May-2018 19:41



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.