Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
3694 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1771

Subscriber

  Reply # 1372060 22-Aug-2015 17:41
Send private message

DarthKermit: And then you get bastards like me who've had UFB running past the gate since early 2013 and haven't connected to it.


Have you no shame?  frown

What are you using instead? Cable? VDSL?




Sideface


17480 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2118

Trusted

  Reply # 1372061 22-Aug-2015 17:46
Send private message

this is getting depressing ... good night!

 
 
 
 


25594 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5372

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Subscriber

  Reply # 1372070 22-Aug-2015 18:10
Send private message

tripper1000:

The reverse of the conspiracy theory has been true in the past with ADSL - it didn't seem like any coincidence that Telecom first cabinetised areas that had unbundled exchanges.
<edit: spelling - you're vs your - grrr>


If that was the case (unbundling UCLL capable exchanges first) it would have been totally logical - UCLL providers cherry picked exchanges with massive coverage footprints for their initial deployments.

Exchanges with massive footprints meant a larger customer base to pick from, but also means there will be large numbers of customers who had poor xDSL due to longer MPF runs.

19282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2600
Inactive user


  Reply # 1372091 22-Aug-2015 18:40
Send private message

Got connected to Fibre yesterday after the spade fade was fixed at the top of the driveway

3694 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1771

Subscriber

  Reply # 1372093 22-Aug-2015 18:43
Send private message

johnr: Got connected to Fibre yesterday after the spade fade was fixed at the top of the driveway


What is a "spade fade"?  (Sounds like a crossword clue.)




Sideface


19282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2600
Inactive user


  Reply # 1372099 22-Aug-2015 18:55
Send private message

Sideface:
johnr: Got connected to Fibre yesterday after the spade fade was fixed at the top of the driveway


What is a "spade fade"?  (Sounds like a crossword clue.)


You are a Geek and don't know what ' Spade fade ' is? Fibre does not like been cut in half with a spade

3694 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1771

Subscriber

  Reply # 1372129 22-Aug-2015 19:14
Send private message

I couldn't find "spade fade" on Google, but I did find BiFF = Backhoe induced Fiber Failure.




Sideface


19282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2600
Inactive user


  Reply # 1372132 22-Aug-2015 19:21
Send private message

Sideface: I couldn't find "spade fade" on Google, but I did find BiFF = Backhoe induced Fiber Failure.


Spade fade is better



50 posts

Geek


  Reply # 1372133 22-Aug-2015 19:22
Send private message

Athlonite:
sbiddle:
Falloutboy:

It makes me wonder if we are being supplied last to protect Vodafones ability to charge exorbitant prices for cable connections in those areas where cable exists as my understanding is there is very little profitability in UFB for ISPs



Can you please explain your logic behind this comment?

It suggests that you think somehow Vodafone have had enough influence over CFH and Enable networks that they purposely aren't installing UFB. Such a comment is totally preposterous. Why would CFH or Enable do such a thing?





Maybe the thought process is that there is already access to high speed broadband services (Vodafone Cable) so no need to rush in willy nilly servicing an already HS enabled area
Who knows but I'd put my money on that being the case though 


The thought process is actually knowledge obtained directly from Telstra Clear of an agreement that existed between Telstra Clear now Vodafone and Telecom now Spark.
When I was a Telstra Clear customer on a 10 megabit connection I was informed by them when wanting to switch to ADSL that I could not as I lived in the Telstra Clear coverage area and that they had a contract with Telecom stating that they were not allowed to on sell ADSL services to people within the Telstra coverage area.

10033 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1582

Trusted

  Reply # 1372186 22-Aug-2015 21:45
Send private message

Falloutboy:
Athlonite:
sbiddle:
Falloutboy:

It makes me wonder if we are being supplied last to protect Vodafones ability to charge exorbitant prices for cable connections in those areas where cable exists as my understanding is there is very little profitability in UFB for ISPs



Can you please explain your logic behind this comment?

It suggests that you think somehow Vodafone have had enough influence over CFH and Enable networks that they purposely aren't installing UFB. Such a comment is totally preposterous. Why would CFH or Enable do such a thing?





Maybe the thought process is that there is already access to high speed broadband services (Vodafone Cable) so no need to rush in willy nilly servicing an already HS enabled area
Who knows but I'd put my money on that being the case though 


The thought process is actually knowledge obtained directly from Telstra Clear of an agreement that existed between Telstra Clear now Vodafone and Telecom now Spark.
When I was a Telstra Clear customer on a 10 megabit connection I was informed by them when wanting to switch to ADSL that I could not as I lived in the Telstra Clear coverage area and that they had a contract with Telecom stating that they were not allowed to on sell ADSL services to people within the Telstra coverage area.


Ive not heard of that. Closest I can recall is that down here, there are some subdivisions that were Telstra cabled only, Pegasus comes to mind. Back in the days of ADSL, some subdivisions were "ADSL-less" Developer choice, save costs. I imagine any Telstra only subdivisions were a developer deal.

2060 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 225

Subscriber

  Reply # 1372193 22-Aug-2015 21:55
Send private message

Falloutboy:
Athlonite:
sbiddle:
Falloutboy:

It makes me wonder if we are being supplied last to protect Vodafones ability to charge exorbitant prices for cable connections in those areas where cable exists as my understanding is there is very little profitability in UFB for ISPs



Can you please explain your logic behind this comment?

It suggests that you think somehow Vodafone have had enough influence over CFH and Enable networks that they purposely aren't installing UFB. Such a comment is totally preposterous. Why would CFH or Enable do such a thing?





Maybe the thought process is that there is already access to high speed broadband services (Vodafone Cable) so no need to rush in willy nilly servicing an already HS enabled area
Who knows but I'd put my money on that being the case though 


The thought process is actually knowledge obtained directly from Telstra Clear of an agreement that existed between Telstra Clear now Vodafone and Telecom now Spark.
When I was a Telstra Clear customer on a 10 megabit connection I was informed by them when wanting to switch to ADSL that I could not as I lived in the Telstra Clear coverage area and that they had a contract with Telecom stating that they were not allowed to on sell ADSL services to people within the Telstra coverage area.


Even if there wasn't such an agreement there is no reason they would sell you ADSL when their own cable network was available.  Why sell a service to where you have to split the revenue with a third party where you can sell a service using your own infrastructure and keep all the revenue.  This will be the same reason that Vodafone won't sell you a fibre service in areas they already have their own cable.

10033 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1582

Trusted

  Reply # 1372308 23-Aug-2015 09:39
Send private message

graemeh:
Falloutboy:
Athlonite:
sbiddle:
Falloutboy:

It makes me wonder if we are being supplied last to protect Vodafones ability to charge exorbitant prices for cable connections in those areas where cable exists as my understanding is there is very little profitability in UFB for ISPs



Can you please explain your logic behind this comment?

It suggests that you think somehow Vodafone have had enough influence over CFH and Enable networks that they purposely aren't installing UFB. Such a comment is totally preposterous. Why would CFH or Enable do such a thing?





Maybe the thought process is that there is already access to high speed broadband services (Vodafone Cable) so no need to rush in willy nilly servicing an already HS enabled area
Who knows but I'd put my money on that being the case though 


The thought process is actually knowledge obtained directly from Telstra Clear of an agreement that existed between Telstra Clear now Vodafone and Telecom now Spark.
When I was a Telstra Clear customer on a 10 megabit connection I was informed by them when wanting to switch to ADSL that I could not as I lived in the Telstra Clear coverage area and that they had a contract with Telecom stating that they were not allowed to on sell ADSL services to people within the Telstra coverage area.


Even if there wasn't such an agreement there is no reason they would sell you ADSL when their own cable network was available.  Why sell a service to where you have to split the revenue with a third party where you can sell a service using your own infrastructure and keep all the revenue.  This will be the same reason that Vodafone won't sell you a fibre service in areas they already have their own cable.


Thats what I feel is the case, I have read that, probably here in the past. And thats fair, it's a business decision

646 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 228


  Reply # 1372915 24-Aug-2015 10:36
Send private message

tdgeek:
Falloutboy:
Athlonite:
sbiddle:
Falloutboy:

It makes me wonder if we are being supplied last to protect Vodafones ability to charge exorbitant prices for cable connections in those areas where cable exists as my understanding is there is very little profitability in UFB for ISPs



Can you please explain your logic behind this comment?

It suggests that you think somehow Vodafone have had enough influence over CFH and Enable networks that they purposely aren't installing UFB. Such a comment is totally preposterous. Why would CFH or Enable do such a thing?





Maybe the thought process is that there is already access to high speed broadband services (Vodafone Cable) so no need to rush in willy nilly servicing an already HS enabled area
Who knows but I'd put my money on that being the case though 


The thought process is actually knowledge obtained directly from Telstra Clear of an agreement that existed between Telstra Clear now Vodafone and Telecom now Spark.
When I was a Telstra Clear customer on a 10 megabit connection I was informed by them when wanting to switch to ADSL that I could not as I lived in the Telstra Clear coverage area and that they had a contract with Telecom stating that they were not allowed to on sell ADSL services to people within the Telstra coverage area.


Ive not heard of that. Closest I can recall is that down here, there are some subdivisions that were Telstra cabled only, Pegasus comes to mind. Back in the days of ADSL, some subdivisions were "ADSL-less" Developer choice, save costs. I imagine any Telstra only subdivisions were a developer deal.




^ This.

TC - now VF want to put customers on their own cable service as opposed to fibre / xDSL, as they reap all the money from the connection (no LFC / lines provider to pay).
That is the reason why.



Btw, just for historical note / useless historical info.

Pegasus was cabled with HFC because the developers wanted fibre, however they didn't know the difference between FTTN and FTTH - they just wanted "fibre".
TC won the bid with HFC.



Feel sorry for the people who purchased there. I think people shouldn't be forced to one RSP only.
Should be personal choice based on RSP merit / offerings.





NZ / AU Battlefield 4 Gaming Community
http://www.sonsofvalour.net/forums/forum.php

1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Talking net neutrality on RNZ Nine-to-Noon
Posted 24-Nov-2017 12:11


Air New Zealand experiments with blockchain technology
Posted 23-Nov-2017 15:39


Symantec selects Amazon Web Services to deliver cloud security
Posted 23-Nov-2017 10:40


New Zealand Ministry of Education chooses Unisys for cloud-based education resourcing management system
Posted 22-Nov-2017 22:00


Business analytics software powers profits for NZ wine producers
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:52


Pyrios strikes up alliance with Microsoft integrator UC Logiq
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:51


The New Zealand IT services ecosystem - it's all digital down here
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:49


Volvo to supply tens of thousands of autonomous drive compatible cars to Uber
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:46


From small to medium and beyond: Navigating the ERP battlefield
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:12


Business owners: ERP software selection starts (and finishes) with you
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:11


Why I'm not an early adopter
Posted 21-Nov-2017 10:39


Netatmo launches smart home products in New Zealand
Posted 20-Nov-2017 20:06


Huawei Mate 10: Punchy, long battery life, artificial intelligence
Posted 20-Nov-2017 16:30


Propel launch Disney Star Wars Laser Battle Drones
Posted 19-Nov-2017 21:26


UFB killer app: Speed
Posted 17-Nov-2017 17:01



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.