Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
3505 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1589

Subscriber

  Reply # 1372060 22-Aug-2015 17:41
Send private message

DarthKermit: And then you get bastards like me who've had UFB running past the gate since early 2013 and haven't connected to it.


Have you no shame?  frown

What are you using instead? Cable? VDSL?




Sideface


16355 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1897

Trusted

  Reply # 1372061 22-Aug-2015 17:46
Send private message

this is getting depressing ... good night!

 
 
 
 


24994 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4880

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Subscriber

  Reply # 1372070 22-Aug-2015 18:10
Send private message

tripper1000:

The reverse of the conspiracy theory has been true in the past with ADSL - it didn't seem like any coincidence that Telecom first cabinetised areas that had unbundled exchanges.
<edit: spelling - you're vs your - grrr>


If that was the case (unbundling UCLL capable exchanges first) it would have been totally logical - UCLL providers cherry picked exchanges with massive coverage footprints for their initial deployments.

Exchanges with massive footprints meant a larger customer base to pick from, but also means there will be large numbers of customers who had poor xDSL due to longer MPF runs.

19290 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2600
Inactive user


  Reply # 1372091 22-Aug-2015 18:40
Send private message

Got connected to Fibre yesterday after the spade fade was fixed at the top of the driveway

3505 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1589

Subscriber

  Reply # 1372093 22-Aug-2015 18:43
Send private message

johnr: Got connected to Fibre yesterday after the spade fade was fixed at the top of the driveway


What is a "spade fade"?  (Sounds like a crossword clue.)




Sideface


19290 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2600
Inactive user


  Reply # 1372099 22-Aug-2015 18:55
Send private message

Sideface:
johnr: Got connected to Fibre yesterday after the spade fade was fixed at the top of the driveway


What is a "spade fade"?  (Sounds like a crossword clue.)


You are a Geek and don't know what ' Spade fade ' is? Fibre does not like been cut in half with a spade

3505 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1589

Subscriber

  Reply # 1372129 22-Aug-2015 19:14
Send private message

I couldn't find "spade fade" on Google, but I did find BiFF = Backhoe induced Fiber Failure.




Sideface


19290 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2600
Inactive user


  Reply # 1372132 22-Aug-2015 19:21
Send private message

Sideface: I couldn't find "spade fade" on Google, but I did find BiFF = Backhoe induced Fiber Failure.


Spade fade is better



50 posts

Geek


  Reply # 1372133 22-Aug-2015 19:22
Send private message

Athlonite:
sbiddle:
Falloutboy:

It makes me wonder if we are being supplied last to protect Vodafones ability to charge exorbitant prices for cable connections in those areas where cable exists as my understanding is there is very little profitability in UFB for ISPs



Can you please explain your logic behind this comment?

It suggests that you think somehow Vodafone have had enough influence over CFH and Enable networks that they purposely aren't installing UFB. Such a comment is totally preposterous. Why would CFH or Enable do such a thing?





Maybe the thought process is that there is already access to high speed broadband services (Vodafone Cable) so no need to rush in willy nilly servicing an already HS enabled area
Who knows but I'd put my money on that being the case though 


The thought process is actually knowledge obtained directly from Telstra Clear of an agreement that existed between Telstra Clear now Vodafone and Telecom now Spark.
When I was a Telstra Clear customer on a 10 megabit connection I was informed by them when wanting to switch to ADSL that I could not as I lived in the Telstra Clear coverage area and that they had a contract with Telecom stating that they were not allowed to on sell ADSL services to people within the Telstra coverage area.

8094 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1128

Trusted

  Reply # 1372186 22-Aug-2015 21:45
Send private message

Falloutboy:
Athlonite:
sbiddle:
Falloutboy:

It makes me wonder if we are being supplied last to protect Vodafones ability to charge exorbitant prices for cable connections in those areas where cable exists as my understanding is there is very little profitability in UFB for ISPs



Can you please explain your logic behind this comment?

It suggests that you think somehow Vodafone have had enough influence over CFH and Enable networks that they purposely aren't installing UFB. Such a comment is totally preposterous. Why would CFH or Enable do such a thing?





Maybe the thought process is that there is already access to high speed broadband services (Vodafone Cable) so no need to rush in willy nilly servicing an already HS enabled area
Who knows but I'd put my money on that being the case though 


The thought process is actually knowledge obtained directly from Telstra Clear of an agreement that existed between Telstra Clear now Vodafone and Telecom now Spark.
When I was a Telstra Clear customer on a 10 megabit connection I was informed by them when wanting to switch to ADSL that I could not as I lived in the Telstra Clear coverage area and that they had a contract with Telecom stating that they were not allowed to on sell ADSL services to people within the Telstra coverage area.


Ive not heard of that. Closest I can recall is that down here, there are some subdivisions that were Telstra cabled only, Pegasus comes to mind. Back in the days of ADSL, some subdivisions were "ADSL-less" Developer choice, save costs. I imagine any Telstra only subdivisions were a developer deal.

2038 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 212

Subscriber

  Reply # 1372193 22-Aug-2015 21:55
Send private message

Falloutboy:
Athlonite:
sbiddle:
Falloutboy:

It makes me wonder if we are being supplied last to protect Vodafones ability to charge exorbitant prices for cable connections in those areas where cable exists as my understanding is there is very little profitability in UFB for ISPs



Can you please explain your logic behind this comment?

It suggests that you think somehow Vodafone have had enough influence over CFH and Enable networks that they purposely aren't installing UFB. Such a comment is totally preposterous. Why would CFH or Enable do such a thing?





Maybe the thought process is that there is already access to high speed broadband services (Vodafone Cable) so no need to rush in willy nilly servicing an already HS enabled area
Who knows but I'd put my money on that being the case though 


The thought process is actually knowledge obtained directly from Telstra Clear of an agreement that existed between Telstra Clear now Vodafone and Telecom now Spark.
When I was a Telstra Clear customer on a 10 megabit connection I was informed by them when wanting to switch to ADSL that I could not as I lived in the Telstra Clear coverage area and that they had a contract with Telecom stating that they were not allowed to on sell ADSL services to people within the Telstra coverage area.


Even if there wasn't such an agreement there is no reason they would sell you ADSL when their own cable network was available.  Why sell a service to where you have to split the revenue with a third party where you can sell a service using your own infrastructure and keep all the revenue.  This will be the same reason that Vodafone won't sell you a fibre service in areas they already have their own cable.

8094 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1128

Trusted

  Reply # 1372308 23-Aug-2015 09:39
Send private message

graemeh:
Falloutboy:
Athlonite:
sbiddle:
Falloutboy:

It makes me wonder if we are being supplied last to protect Vodafones ability to charge exorbitant prices for cable connections in those areas where cable exists as my understanding is there is very little profitability in UFB for ISPs



Can you please explain your logic behind this comment?

It suggests that you think somehow Vodafone have had enough influence over CFH and Enable networks that they purposely aren't installing UFB. Such a comment is totally preposterous. Why would CFH or Enable do such a thing?





Maybe the thought process is that there is already access to high speed broadband services (Vodafone Cable) so no need to rush in willy nilly servicing an already HS enabled area
Who knows but I'd put my money on that being the case though 


The thought process is actually knowledge obtained directly from Telstra Clear of an agreement that existed between Telstra Clear now Vodafone and Telecom now Spark.
When I was a Telstra Clear customer on a 10 megabit connection I was informed by them when wanting to switch to ADSL that I could not as I lived in the Telstra Clear coverage area and that they had a contract with Telecom stating that they were not allowed to on sell ADSL services to people within the Telstra coverage area.


Even if there wasn't such an agreement there is no reason they would sell you ADSL when their own cable network was available.  Why sell a service to where you have to split the revenue with a third party where you can sell a service using your own infrastructure and keep all the revenue.  This will be the same reason that Vodafone won't sell you a fibre service in areas they already have their own cable.


Thats what I feel is the case, I have read that, probably here in the past. And thats fair, it's a business decision

646 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 228


  Reply # 1372915 24-Aug-2015 10:36
Send private message

tdgeek:
Falloutboy:
Athlonite:
sbiddle:
Falloutboy:

It makes me wonder if we are being supplied last to protect Vodafones ability to charge exorbitant prices for cable connections in those areas where cable exists as my understanding is there is very little profitability in UFB for ISPs



Can you please explain your logic behind this comment?

It suggests that you think somehow Vodafone have had enough influence over CFH and Enable networks that they purposely aren't installing UFB. Such a comment is totally preposterous. Why would CFH or Enable do such a thing?





Maybe the thought process is that there is already access to high speed broadband services (Vodafone Cable) so no need to rush in willy nilly servicing an already HS enabled area
Who knows but I'd put my money on that being the case though 


The thought process is actually knowledge obtained directly from Telstra Clear of an agreement that existed between Telstra Clear now Vodafone and Telecom now Spark.
When I was a Telstra Clear customer on a 10 megabit connection I was informed by them when wanting to switch to ADSL that I could not as I lived in the Telstra Clear coverage area and that they had a contract with Telecom stating that they were not allowed to on sell ADSL services to people within the Telstra coverage area.


Ive not heard of that. Closest I can recall is that down here, there are some subdivisions that were Telstra cabled only, Pegasus comes to mind. Back in the days of ADSL, some subdivisions were "ADSL-less" Developer choice, save costs. I imagine any Telstra only subdivisions were a developer deal.




^ This.

TC - now VF want to put customers on their own cable service as opposed to fibre / xDSL, as they reap all the money from the connection (no LFC / lines provider to pay).
That is the reason why.



Btw, just for historical note / useless historical info.

Pegasus was cabled with HFC because the developers wanted fibre, however they didn't know the difference between FTTN and FTTH - they just wanted "fibre".
TC won the bid with HFC.



Feel sorry for the people who purchased there. I think people shouldn't be forced to one RSP only.
Should be personal choice based on RSP merit / offerings.





NZ / AU Battlefield 4 Gaming Community
http://www.sonsofvalour.net/forums/forum.php

1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Behind Spark’s slow-burn 4.5G plan
Posted 26-Jun-2017 16:23


Red Hat unveils production-ready open source hyperconverged infrastructure
Posted 23-Jun-2017 22:10


Whatever ailed Vodafone broadband … seems to be fixed
Posted 23-Jun-2017 14:10


VMware NSX Meets Stringent Government Security Standards with Common Criteria Certification
Posted 22-Jun-2017 19:05


Brother launches next-generation colour laser printers and all-in- ones for business
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:56


Intel and IOC announce partnership
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:50


Samsung Galaxy Tab S3: Best Android tablet
Posted 21-Jun-2017 12:05


Wellington-based company helping secure Microsoft browsers
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:51


Endace delivers high performance with new 1/10/40 Gbps packet capture card
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:50


You can now integrate SMX security into Microsoft Office 365, Google and other cloud email platforms
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:47


Ravensdown launches new decision-making tool HawkEye
Posted 19-Jun-2017 15:38


Spark planning to take on direct management of all consumer stores
Posted 19-Jun-2017 10:03


Qrious acquires Ubiquity
Posted 14-Jun-2017 12:21


Spark New Zealand prepares for 5G with Nokia
Posted 14-Jun-2017 12:16


The future-proof 10.5-inch iPad Pro
Posted 13-Jun-2017 18:16



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.