Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




73 posts

Master Geek


# 180722 19-Sep-2015 11:46
Send private message

This morning is now the 4th time I've had a UFB install appointment and the 4th time no-one has turned-up!
Is Chorus responsible for this sort of behaviour themselves, or sub-contractors?

Create new topic
252 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 1390168 19-Sep-2015 11:48
Send private message

Ultimately chorus is. Whether it is an employee or a subcontractor is just a question of how they are remunerated.




Try my latest project, a Cisco type 5 enable secret password cracker written in javascript!

19282 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  # 1390172 19-Sep-2015 12:01
Send private message

Depends on location

 
 
 
 




73 posts

Master Geek


  # 1390190 19-Sep-2015 12:51
Send private message

Auckland, inner south

2090 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 1390212 19-Sep-2015 13:39
Send private message

In a deep corner of my mind, I thought there was something on fair go or the consumer institute where you could bill the person who did not turn up and you incurred costs.

I think it was to do with plumbers/electricians, but the principle should hold for the Fibre People.

Anyone else have memory of something similar or is it wishful thinking on my part ?

A.




73 posts

Master Geek


  # 1390590 20-Sep-2015 13:14
Send private message

afe66: wishful thinking on my part ?

This, I think.
I just cannot understand why Chorus can not even turn-up for 4 separate UFB appointments and think that it provides the country a service.

28210 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1390599 20-Sep-2015 14:30
One person supports this post
Send private message

aumouth:
afe66: wishful thinking on my part ?

This, I think.
I just cannot understand why Chorus can not even turn-up for 4 separate UFB appointments and think that it provides the country a service.


To get 4 jobs like that I'd be seriously questioning what contact details your ISP has lodged rather than immediately blaming Chorus.



73 posts

Master Geek


  # 1390605 20-Sep-2015 14:56
Send private message

sbiddle: 
To get 4 jobs like that I'd be seriously questioning what contact details your ISP has lodged rather than immediately blaming Chorus.

I checked with both ISP and Chorus directly, after the first non-attendance, they they had the correct contact details and address.

 
 
 
 


28210 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1390643 20-Sep-2015 16:29
Send private message

aumouth:
sbiddle: 
To get 4 jobs like that I'd be seriously questioning what contact details your ISP has lodged rather than immediately blaming Chorus.

I checked with both ISP and Chorus directly, after the first non-attendance, they they had the correct contact details and address.


The reasons for non attendance will be in the Chorus job details. What has your ISP told you the reasons for these are? Rescheduling is also incredibly common, and if your ISP isn't informing you then it's hard to blame Chorus.







73 posts

Master Geek


  # 1390655 20-Sep-2015 16:46
Send private message

sbiddle: 
The reasons for non attendance will be in the Chorus job details. What has your ISP told you the reasons for these are? Rescheduling is also incredibly common, and if your ISP isn't informing you then it's hard to blame Chorus.

sbiddle: Because in my experience (across numerous UFB installs) you'll get a phone call the day before from the scoper, a call on the day from the scoper, a call the day before install and a call on the day of the install. Email isn't an instant form of communication for most people.


So is it the ISP or Chorus's issue for not communicating? For non-attendance at the appointment days/times given? Your saying it's the ISP that's left to clean-up for Chorus's failure? So I should be holding my ISP responsible for Chrous not attending and not communicating?

I, as the customer and end-user, apply for UFB through my ISP/retailer. They, in turn, give it to Chorus because they do the physical work. In either case, I shouldn't have to chase either of them.

28210 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1390662 20-Sep-2015 16:57
Send private message

aumouth:
sbiddle: 
The reasons for non attendance will be in the Chorus job details. What has your ISP told you the reasons for these are? Rescheduling is also incredibly common, and if your ISP isn't informing you then it's hard to blame Chorus.

sbiddle: Because in my experience (across numerous UFB installs) you'll get a phone call the day before from the scoper, a call on the day from the scoper, a call the day before install and a call on the day of the install. Email isn't an instant form of communication for most people.


So is it the ISP or Chorus's issue for not communicating? For non-attendance at the appointment days/times given? Your saying it's the ISP that's left to clean-up for Chorus's failure? So I should be holding my ISP responsible for Chrous not attending and not communicating?

I, as the customer and end-user, apply for UFB through my ISP/retailer. They, in turn, give it to Chorus because they do the physical work. In either case, I shouldn't have to chase either of them.


Who you hold responsible really depends on what happened. As we don't know what happened it's impossible to lay any form of fault. Chorus can be an absolute PITA to deal with at times (that is part of my day job) but to immediately lay the blame onto them without knowing the full details is probably uncalled for.

When you lodge a UFB job and the location if flagged as a SDU and no other work is required your RSP will book a date for scoping, and book a date for the install. Chorus RFS dates can and do change, and if these dates are updated and your RSP doesn't update you then they ultimately have to take the blame, not Chorus.





673 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 1390664 20-Sep-2015 17:03
Send private message

sbiddle:
aumouth:
sbiddle: 
The reasons for non attendance will be in the Chorus job details. What has your ISP told you the reasons for these are? Rescheduling is also incredibly common, and if your ISP isn't informing you then it's hard to blame Chorus.

sbiddle: Because in my experience (across numerous UFB installs) you'll get a phone call the day before from the scoper, a call on the day from the scoper, a call the day before install and a call on the day of the install. Email isn't an instant form of communication for most people.


So is it the ISP or Chorus's issue for not communicating? For non-attendance at the appointment days/times given? Your saying it's the ISP that's left to clean-up for Chorus's failure? So I should be holding my ISP responsible for Chrous not attending and not communicating?

I, as the customer and end-user, apply for UFB through my ISP/retailer. They, in turn, give it to Chorus because they do the physical work. In either case, I shouldn't have to chase either of them.


Who you hold responsible really depends on what happened. As we don't know what happened it's impossible to lay any form of fault. Chorus can be an absolute PITA to deal with at times (that is part of my day job) but to immediately lay the blame onto them without knowing the full details is probably uncalled for.

When you lodge a UFB job and the location if flagged as a SDU and no other work is required your RSP will book a date for scoping, and book a date for the install. Chorus RFS dates can and do change, and if these dates are updated and your RSP doesn't update you then they ultimately have to take the blame, not Chorus.






I get where you are coming from but from my experience with install orders the most common rescheduling notification received from chorus has been a new date issued a day or more after the first install date had passed with zero communication prior to this happening, This obviously leaves absolutely no time for the ISP to notify the customer prior to the tech simply not showing up.




Perpetually undecided.



73 posts

Master Geek


  # 1391594 22-Sep-2015 00:17
Send private message

So my ISP advises the following today;
"The Remote Access Terminal (RAT) will be installed by the end of the week. Once that is completed the service company will contact you directly to rebook the job to install Fibre."

So the appointment shouldn't have been made if equipment isn't even ready? The ISP said it was Chorus who makes the appointment, and advises them. And when was it determined that equipment wasn't installed - before my appointment, or on the morning of the appointment? And of course, neither Chorus or my ISP let me know until afterwards.

And, very similar to the apparent reason no-one turned up for my previous (3rd) appointment of 21/Aug; "The delay is due to an additional build work' that is required for this job. This needs to be done in order for us to get a connection and network ready for install. Once the build work is completed, we will then be able to progress the order to install. "

Unbelievable.

6434 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1391649 22-Sep-2015 07:53
Send private message

Sounds a lot like chorus issues with their database.
The ISP can only go by what chorus systems say when it comes to booking dates.
I.e. If the chorus system was accurate and told them your property was at the 'build' stage, then it is impossible for the ISP to book installation dates.
If I had to guess what has happened here, I'd say the chorus system gave the wrong information about property status, then when the tech turned up to have a look he realised the problem and just left, and then it took several weeks for that information to filter back through to chorus and be updated so the ISP could then pass that info to you.

Create new topic



Switch your broadband provider now - compare prices


Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Amazon Studios announces New Zealand as location for its upcoming series based on The Lord of the Rings
Posted 18-Sep-2019 17:24


The Warehouse chooses Elasticsearch service
Posted 18-Sep-2019 13:55


Voyager upgrades core network to 100Gbit
Posted 18-Sep-2019 13:52


Streaming service Acorn TV launches in New Zealand with selection with British shows
Posted 18-Sep-2019 08:55


Bitcoin.com announces partnership with smartphone manufacturer HTC
Posted 16-Sep-2019 21:30


Finalists Announced for Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 16-Sep-2019 19:37


OPPO Showcases New CameraX Capabilities at Google Developer Days China 2019
Posted 15-Sep-2019 12:42


New Zealand PC Market returns to growth
Posted 15-Sep-2019 12:24


Home sensor charity director speaks about the preventable death which drives her to push for healthy homes
Posted 11-Sep-2019 08:46


Te ao Maori Minecraft world set to inspire Kiwi students
Posted 11-Sep-2019 08:43


Research reveals The Power of Games in New Zealand
Posted 11-Sep-2019 08:40


Ring Door View Cam now available in New Zealand
Posted 11-Sep-2019 08:38


Vodafone NZ to create X Squad
Posted 10-Sep-2019 10:25


Huawei nova 5T to be available 20th September
Posted 5-Sep-2019 11:55


Kogan.com launches prepay challenger brand Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 3-Sep-2019 11:42



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.