Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
836 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 143006 4-Jul-2008 17:28
Send private message

michaeln:
Fraktul:
Copper is not opaque so the speed of light is copper is not relevent - you are reffering to the speed of electromagnetic wave propogation outside a copper wire.

No, I'm referring to the speed of electromagnetic radiation propagation (c, familiarly the 'speed of light') through copper. I.e. 'light' in this case meaning photons, for which copper is anything but opaque, given the appropriate frequency of photon. Likewise, 'copper' in this context could encompass UTP, STP or various waveguides with a diverse range of dialectrics. The formula is no less relevant and for the copper based transmission media 'about 75%' is a perfectly fine approximation.


Should have read copper is opaque. Copper obviously does not transmit light very well, it is mostly reflected or absorbed. I'm not saying the formula is not relevent, I'm saying that reffering to the speed of light in copper is pretty nonsensical when you are in fact meaning the electromagnetic wave propogation.

3533 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 124

Trusted

  Reply # 143018 4-Jul-2008 18:25
Send private message

Fraktul: ...I'm saying that reffering to the speed of light in copper is pretty nonsensical when you are in fact meaning the electromagnetic wave propogation.

Actually Fraktul **cough** putting on my Electrical Engineer's hat here, it isn't Electromagnetic Wave Propagation we are dealing with either.  That only happens in Free Space.

The mechanism involved is Electron Drift Velocity and this little snippet sums it up quite well:

At the given drift speed it would take about 2000 seconds for an electron to travel 20cm distance.  It is about half an hour.  But discharge happens instantaneously.  This is because the wire is already full with electrons!


If you think of a pipeline full of electrons it makes it easier to visualise.  Push an extra electron into the pipe and another one more-or-less instantaneously pops out the other end.  The speed of this mechanism is controlled by the electric field applied from one end of the conductor to the other.

According to some info. here:

http://www.physics.wayne.edu/~apetrov/PHY2140/Lecture8.ppt

The velocity of the electric field is about 10^8 metres per second i.e. 1/3 of the speed of light.

 
 
 
 


836 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 143024 4-Jul-2008 18:48
Send private message

grant_k:
Fraktul: ...I'm saying that reffering to the speed of light in copper is pretty nonsensical when you are in fact meaning the electromagnetic wave propogation.

Actually Fraktul **cough** putting on my Electrical Engineer's hat here, it isn't Electromagnetic Wave Propagation we are dealing with either.  That only happens in Free Space.

The mechanism involved is Electron Drift Velocity and this little snippet sums it up quite well:

At the given drift speed it would take about 2000 seconds for an electron to travel 20cm distance.  It is about half an hour.  But discharge happens instantaneously.  This is because the wire is already full with electrons!


If you think of a pipeline full of electrons it makes it easier to visualise.  Push an extra electron into the pipe and another one more-or-less instantaneously pops out the other end.  The speed of this mechanism is controlled by the electric field applied from one end of the conductor to the other.

According to some info. here:

http://www.physics.wayne.edu/~apetrov/PHY2140/Lecture8.ppt

The velocity of the electric field is about 10^8 metres per second i.e. 1/3 of the speed of light.


I am well aware the actual speed of electrons in a DC tramsmission is very low (in AC it is obviously effectively 0 as a vector). "Discharge" cannot happen instantionously - think about what that would imply, instantaneous communications. I stand corrected on wave vs field.

1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Vodafone TV — television in the cloud
Posted 17-Oct-2017 19:29


Nokia 8 review: Classy midrange pure Android phone
Posted 16-Oct-2017 07:27


Why carriers might want to embrace Commerce Commission study, MVNOs
Posted 13-Oct-2017 09:42


Fitbit launches Ionic, its health and fitness smartwatch
Posted 12-Oct-2017 15:52


Xero launches machine learning automation to improve coding accuracy for small businesses
Posted 12-Oct-2017 15:45


Bank of New Zealand uses Intel AI to detect financial crime
Posted 12-Oct-2017 15:39


Sony launches Xperia XZ1, a smartphone with real-time 3D capture
Posted 11-Oct-2017 10:26


Notes on Nokia’s phone comeback
Posted 10-Oct-2017 10:06


Air New Zealand begins Inflight Wi-Fi rollout
Posted 9-Oct-2017 20:16


The latest mobile phones in perspective
Posted 9-Oct-2017 18:34


Review: Acronis True Image 2018 — serious backup
Posted 8-Oct-2017 11:22


Lenovo launches ThinkPad Anniversary Edition 25
Posted 7-Oct-2017 23:16


Less fone, more tech as Vodafone gets brand make-over
Posted 6-Oct-2017 08:16


API Talent Achieves AWS MSP Partner Status
Posted 5-Oct-2017 21:20


Stellar Consulting Group now a Domo Partner
Posted 5-Oct-2017 21:03



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.