Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4
6299 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 378

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 306320 11-Mar-2010 16:51
Send private message

freitasm:Pacific Fibre, an early stage international fibre venture founded by a group including New Zealand businessmen Stephen Tindall, Sam Morgan and Rod Drury, announced its plans today, aiming to break the digital divide between New Zealand, Australia and the rest of the world.


At least you know there'll be plenty of capital investment from these three wealthy business heavyweights.

668 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 10


  Reply # 306347 11-Mar-2010 17:58
Send private message

In regards to the "unlimited" thing, they say on their Twitter feed:

we will sell to ISPs and major corporates. We are aiming for prices which will let them fulfll the uncapped high speed mandate



Some people seem to forget that "unlimited" is not the same as "infinite". You are still constrained by your connection speed. A 10Mbps connection can "only" download 3TB in a month if it went flat out 24/7. There's nothing inherently unfeasible about "unlimited" internet.


I'm very glad to see this project come about. I'm especially pleased with the capacity, latency, price and timeline goals. And to top it all off, the founders are perfect for the job. I really hope this happens, but the cynic in me is wary. It's very ambitious - but if anyone can do it, it's them. The government needs to make sure this doesn't fail.

 
 
 
 




BDFL - Memuneh
59395 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10606

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 306348 11-Mar-2010 18:00
Send private message

The 10Mbps connection can get a theoretical 3TB. But how much of this connection is contrained? ISPs can't "buy" full speed for every single user. They can't pay the price. So they buy the amount of traffic for the average user base they have. Then they have to start limiting because buying more costs money...






BDFL - Memuneh
59395 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10606

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 306349 11-Mar-2010 18:02
Send private message

nate:
freitasm:Pacific Fibre, an early stage international fibre venture founded by a group including New Zealand businessmen Stephen Tindall, Sam Morgan and Rod Drury, announced its plans today, aiming to break the digital divide between New Zealand, Australia and the rest of the world.


At least you know there'll be plenty of capital investment from these three wealthy business heavyweights.


I don't think they will put only their money into this. They have to raise capital - they don't have $900 million dollars available at their fingertips. So at some stage they have factored the capital cost - and they will have to get that money back. This is going to be just one little bit of the total cost for this initiative.





8020 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 386

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 306352 11-Mar-2010 18:10
Send private message

freitasm: The 10Mbps connection can get a theoretical 3TB. But how much of this connection is contrained? ISPs can't "buy" full speed for every single user. They can't pay the price. So they buy the amount of traffic for the average user base they have. Then they have to start limiting because buying more costs money...


ISP's have always purchased X bandwidth for Y users at their own choice of "contention ratio", eg: 1000 users with average sync speed is 10Mbit each, they might use 100:1 contention ratio where they'd purchase 100Mbit of bandwidth.

Sadly No ISP's in NZ disclose their contention ratio(s) for international traffic/bandwidth (so we don't know how bad they really are).

Charging per GB has always been just an easy way to get users to restrict their usage without requiring the ISP to have hardware/management/enough bandwidth to share fairly between users.

I guess what Pacific are saying is that they are aiming to offer large amounts of bandwidth cheap enough that the contention ratio becomes favourable/low enough that per GB charging will become a non factor or irrelevant.

Should be interesting.



BDFL - Memuneh
59395 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10606

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 306353 11-Mar-2010 18:13
Send private message
970 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted
Vodafone

  Reply # 306366 11-Mar-2010 18:58

We would be interested in talking to these guys about buying capacity off them.

Cheers

Paul




Paul Brislen
Head of Corporate Communications
Vodafone

http://forum.vodafone.co.nz




BDFL - Memuneh
59395 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10606

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 306367 11-Mar-2010 18:59
Send private message
518 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 306374 11-Mar-2010 19:23
Send private message

Ragnor:
freitasm: The 10Mbps connection can get a theoretical 3TB. But how much of this connection is contrained? ISPs can't "buy" full speed for every single user. They can't pay the price. So they buy the amount of traffic for the average user base they have. Then they have to start limiting because buying more costs money...


ISP's have always purchased X bandwidth for Y users at their own choice of "contention ratio", eg: 1000 users with average sync speed is 10Mbit each, they might use 100:1 contention ratio where they'd purchase 100Mbit of bandwidth.

Sadly No ISP's in NZ disclose their contention ratio(s) for international traffic/bandwidth (so we don't know how bad they really are).

Charging per GB has always been just an easy way to get users to restrict their usage without requiring the ISP to have hardware/management/enough bandwidth to share fairly between users.

I guess what Pacific are saying is that they are aiming to offer large amounts of bandwidth cheap enough that the contention ratio becomes favourable/low enough that per GB charging will become a non factor or irrelevant.

Should be interesting.


I hope they calculate this enough for it to actually come true, it would work wonders for NZ in general




PC: 3.3ghz Core i5-2500, 8gb DDR3, ATI Radeon 5850, 27" QHD IPS Monitor

Mobile Phone: iPhone 5 32gb Graphite.


668 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 10


  Reply # 306386 11-Mar-2010 20:40
Send private message

freitasm: The 10Mbps connection can get a theoretical 3TB. But how much of this connection is contrained? ISPs can't "buy" full speed for every single user. They can't pay the price. So they buy the amount of traffic for the average user base they have. Then they have to start limiting because buying more costs money...


Ragnor has answered this and I don't really have any more to add, just a bit of expanding. "Unlimited" is all about having enough bandwidth available to offer a service without caps at an acceptable contention ratio. You either introduce caps, have a high contention ratio, or have a fat pipe. Bandwidth in NZ today isn't cheap enough for most ISPs to offer an unlimited plan without having a significantly higher contention ratio than they do. Obviously most people wouldn't like to put up with such potentially slow speeds, so the unlimited services aren't offered. The hope is that the new cable will be able to reduce bandwidth costs enough that ISPs could offer unlimited plans without that vastly increased contention ratio.


freitasm: I don't think they will put only their money into this. They have to raise capital - they don't have $900 million dollars available at their fingertips. So at some stage they have factored the capital cost - and they will have to get that money back. This is going to be just one little bit of the total cost for this initiative.


What they do have is significant experience, contacts, knowledge and clout. Being who they are, they are in a very good position to raise the capital.

668 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 10


  Reply # 306389 11-Mar-2010 20:53
Send private message
1200 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3

Trusted

  Reply # 306415 11-Mar-2010 22:01
Send private message

freitasm:  I don't think they will put only their money into this. They have to raise capital - they don't have $900 million dollars available at their fingertips. So at some stage they have factored the capital cost - and they will have to get that money back. This is going to be just one little bit of the total cost for this initiative.



From memory Southern Cross Cable paid off it's capital outlay in some ridiculous amount of time like 9 months or something (I should did up the actual time instead of offering inaccurate figures :) but it was well well worth it for Telecom and the other investors in SCC.

I'm all for a second (and third :) cable, and the cable going to the USA as well - but I wonder why it's required to go to the USA, you would think the cheaper option would be just to run a cable to Australia, they have a quite good connectivity to the internet backbones

Worldwide Internet Backbone Map
http://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/m.dodge/cybergeography//atlas/teleglobe_large.gif

Don't get me wrong I'm all for doing it right the first time and doing the whole kit and caboodle - it's just so unlike NZ'ers to do it that way :-)

I'm loving the focus on latency, it would make things like the Amazon EC2 cloud usable for latency sensitive applications

Oh, and can someone tell me why the Peering location at Auckland is like 100 odd stories up the sky tower, I would have throught this would have been the worst location to have a peering point for disasters etc??? I've never been able to figure this out - apart from lack of flooding!




Tyler - Parnell Geek - iPhone 3G - Lenovo X301 - Kaseya - Great Western Steak House, these are some of my favourite things.

244 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 10

Trusted

  Reply # 306420 11-Mar-2010 22:16
Send private message

I'm very happy to read of these developments as any investment to improve our connectivity with the wider world is key to the future success of the much vaunted future domestic investment by private and/or public sectors alike.

While debate seems to rage here about the overall use and availablity of the anticipated capacity when it arrives, the fact there are investors keen to connect up a 'big fat pipe' between NZ and USA to get us this extra capacity is 'the' story for me today.

268 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 49


  Reply # 306442 12-Mar-2010 00:38
Send private message

exportgoldman:
I'm loving the focus on latency, it would make things like the Amazon EC2 cloud usable for latency sensitive applications


In the technical details they estimate that oneway latency should reduce from 61ms on SCC to 54ms on PacFib. For comparison, the time it takes for light to travel 10,500km in a vacuum is about 35ms, which would represent the absolute rockbottom theoretical latency between NZ and the US.

Oh, and can someone tell me why the Peering location at Auckland is like 100 odd stories up the sky tower


Because:

The Sky Tower was agreed to be a sensible meeting place, since it was already kitted out as a telehousing facility, it's a good high-point for wireless access, and it was about as neutral a point to meet as anybody could think of.

And because the rooms set aside for telecommunications equipment is high up in the air, mainly for all those antennas on top.

25 posts

Geek


  Reply # 306494 12-Mar-2010 09:43
Send private message

Screeb: Some people seem to forget that "unlimited" is not the same as "infinite". You are still constrained by your connection speed. A 10Mbps connection can "only" download 3TB in a month if it went flat out 24/7. There's nothing inherently unfeasible about "unlimited" internet.


While you might be right about that, the whole idea is a "fibre rollout to the home" which Vector has been doing for some time,  and is currently in the process of trying to get the Government to pay for it.

It's not like we are going to have a 12TB fibre cable that is going to be coming to the exchange - cabinet or straight to our homes on the current copper pairs is it.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

$3.74 million for new electric vehicles in New Zealand
Posted 17-Jan-2018 11:27


Nova 2i: Value, not excitement from Huawei
Posted 17-Jan-2018 09:02


Less news in Facebook News Feed revamp
Posted 15-Jan-2018 13:15


Australian Government contract awarded to Datacom Connect
Posted 11-Jan-2018 08:37


Why New Zealand needs a chief technology officer
Posted 6-Jan-2018 13:59


Amazon release Silk Browser and Firefox for Fire TV
Posted 21-Dec-2017 13:42


New Chief Technology Officer role created
Posted 19-Dec-2017 22:18


All I want for Christmas is a new EV
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:54


How clever is this: AI will create 2.3 million jobs by 2020
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:52


NOW to deploy SD-WAN to regional councils
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:46


Mobile market competition issues ComCom should watch
Posted 18-Dec-2017 10:52


New Zealand government to create digital advisory group
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:47


Australia datum changes means whole country moving 1.8 metres north-east
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:39


UAV Traffic Management Trial launching today in New Zealand
Posted 12-Dec-2017 16:06


UFB connections pass 460,000
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:26



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.