Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
3415 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 405

Trusted

  Reply # 541293 4-Nov-2011 19:39
Send private message

Screeb:
Morph:
LennonNZ: But the difference between a Car and an Internet connection is with a Car if someone breaks the law (speeds or drives the car without a WOF/Registration) the person driving the car gets charged not the owner.

With the internet if someone else is driving (using) your internet for downloading copyrighted materials the owner of the Internet is libel not the actual person downloading copyrighted material.


But if the driver does a burnout or something along the lines of that the car WILL be impounded. 


Will your car get impounded if you use it to transport/distribute illegally copied material? Didn't think so. 


Exactly, no matter your stance on copyright law this is stupid legislation from an implementation point of view.





BDFL - Memuneh
61478 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12204

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 541296 4-Nov-2011 19:45
Send private message


119 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 22
Inactive user


  Reply # 541310 4-Nov-2011 20:29
Send private message

Big difference between Law and Statute.

The Law of Gravity will always exist, a Statute on the other hand, is up to the minds of wo/men.

Back to the topic, I appreciate all the comments.

I think the best suggestions so far - are people given the password - the house rules are please don't download copyrighted material.

Like all rules though without someway of detecting the rules have or are being broken it's pretty meaningless.

I'm surprised that there isn't some simple techy solution. Librarys, hotels, restaurants, airports etc all share wireless internet connections to unknowns and would face the same problem.

All the best.


27122 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6564

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 541314 4-Nov-2011 20:37
Send private message

Screeb:
Morph:
LennonNZ: But the difference between a Car and an Internet connection is with a Car if someone breaks the law (speeds or drives the car without a WOF/Registration) the person driving the car gets charged not the owner.

With the internet if someone else is driving (using) your internet for downloading copyrighted materials the owner of the Internet is libel not the actual person downloading copyrighted material.


But if the driver does a burnout or something along the lines of that the car WILL be impounded. 


Will your car get impounded if you use it to transport/distribute illegally copied material? Didn't think so. 


It could be argued however that a car is not a transport medium that results in the copyright being broken. A computer network allows replication of data.


1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.