Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
2423 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 468

Trusted

  Reply # 452359 27-Mar-2011 12:15
Send private message

I installed FF4 for Mac on Thursday. It crashed 3 times on Thursday, but Friday was relatively "stable", with FF only winking out of existence once that day. I'm gonna give it a little bit longer, but if this instability keeps up I'll probably be switching back to Safari or giving Chrome another bash (rendering irregularities on some sites initially put me off).

4308 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 799

Trusted

  Reply # 452378 27-Mar-2011 13:23
Send private message

simon14: Chrome 19,000k
IE9 33,000k
Firefox4 60,000k


more details? how many tabs? screenshot? i open 35 tabs earlier this morning with at least 5 sites that use flash heavily. firefox still uses less than 600MB for me but chrome reaching 1GB





 
 
 
 


1828 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 18

Trusted

  Reply # 452384 27-Mar-2011 13:35
Send private message

nakedmolerat:
simon14: Chrome 19,000k
IE9 33,000k
Firefox4 60,000k


more details? how many tabs? screenshot? i open 35 tabs earlier this morning with at least 5 sites that use flash heavily. firefox still uses less than 600MB for me but chrome reaching 1GB


That was a test with all browsers open with only 1 tab on the geekzone homepage.
 

264 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  Reply # 452466 27-Mar-2011 17:19
Send private message

freitasm:
richms: IMO, it is still inexcusable the amount it takes, at least its not like some other browsers that crap all over your computer with many many processes, seemingly one or 2 per tab (cough IE cough)


And Chrome. On the other hand, if a tab crashes, it won't take down the whole browser.
   


That is the theory at least, although in practice it doesnt always work that way.

There is a spin-off project of FF that is working towards making FF use the same architecture (seperate process per tab) yet it is a huge change, and while it has been around for a while it is going to take a long time to make these changes and then integrate them back in to the main FF trunk.

19925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3652

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 452468 27-Mar-2011 17:22
Send private message

Well I am happy enough with flash being moved to another process since thats the usual one that takes incredible amounts of ram. Just killed plugin-container because it was hitting 1.4 gigs ram used. All I had done in that browser was watch a ustream and the associated chat.




Richard rich.ms

264 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  Reply # 452473 27-Mar-2011 17:26
Send private message

richms: Well I am happy enough with flash being moved to another process since thats the usual one that takes incredible amounts of ram. Just killed plugin-container because it was hitting 1.4 gigs ram used. All I had done in that browser was watch a ustream and the associated chat.


Generally I find the biggest issue I have with FF4 is the flash player always causing errors. I have FF4 and Chrome installed at home and work, and most of the time I will watch videos in Chrome just because it seems more stable.

If it wasnt for the new panorama and group tab stuff you can do in FF4, I would probably have given up on it by now. But now that I'm used to having a different tab group for each project I'm working on plus another one for my personal stuff, I couldnt imagine not having things setup like that in a browser.

19925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3652

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 452475 27-Mar-2011 17:30
Send private message

8d52797c436:

If it wasnt for the new panorama and group tab stuff you can do in FF4, I would probably have given up on it by now. But now that I'm used to having a different tab group for each project I'm working on plus another one for my personal stuff, I couldnt imagine not having things setup like that in a browser.


I have seperate instances of firefox to handle that, with their own bookmarks synced via xmarks. Means that crap like that facebook snooping doesnt worry me as much as the profile I use facebook in doesnt see much other use.

Also sorts out that mess that is google accounts since the multiple login thing has never worked properly IME




Richard rich.ms

267 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 452613 28-Mar-2011 00:28
Send private message

I never found Firefox to be a memory hog.. In fact I fond it to be the lightest on my system... But the thing that im not sure about with fx 4 is that things seem to take longer to load.. They say that its the fastest version of fx yet... but I seem to have to wait that little bit longer for webpages and videos to load... Is it just me? or everyone?

2336 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 80


  Reply # 452635 28-Mar-2011 09:21
Send private message

Hmm, have you tried disabling all your addons or running FF in safe-mode on the same page?

1828 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 18

Trusted

  Reply # 452651 28-Mar-2011 09:49
Send private message

kyhwana2: Hmm, have you tried disabling all your addons or running FF in safe-mode on the same page?


My only addon was Firefox Sync which Chrome has built in anyway. 

8020 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 384

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 452842 28-Mar-2011 17:41
Send private message

simon14:
kyhwana2: Hmm, have you tried disabling all your addons or running FF in safe-mode on the same page?


My only addon was Firefox Sync which Chrome has built in anyway. 


Firefox 4 has inbuilt sync, perhaps this addon is causing a conflict/problem?

Obviously huge memory usage is indicative of a problem but comparing "normal" memory usage is meaningless.... 

You want your browser to cache things in memory instead of reading them from disk/internet or redoing processing/parsing.  Higher memory usage is often better for performance!



1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Nothing nebulous about Microsoft’s cloud-transition
Posted 21-Jul-2017 15:34


We’re spending more on tech, but not as much as Australians
Posted 21-Jul-2017 11:43


Endace announces EndaceFabric for network-wide packet recording
Posted 20-Jul-2017 20:49


Acorn 6: MacOS image editing for the rest of us
Posted 20-Jul-2017 17:04


HTC faces backlash over keyboard pop-up ads
Posted 19-Jul-2017 15:53


BNZ adds Visa credit cards to Android Pay wallet
Posted 18-Jul-2017 19:44


Still living in a Notification hell – Om Malik
Posted 18-Jul-2017 13:00


Duet Display uses iPad to extend Mac, PC
Posted 18-Jul-2017 10:58


PC sales could be worse
Posted 17-Jul-2017 07:34


Crypto-currencies, tulips, market bubbles
Posted 17-Jul-2017 06:38


NZ Tech Podcast: Big batteries, solar cars, cold war, IoT
Posted 16-Jul-2017 16:53


Vodafone Australia mulls Wisp alliance, NZ implications
Posted 13-Jul-2017 16:49


Rural health professionals see fibre pay-off
Posted 13-Jul-2017 11:52


Vodafone announces expansion of $5 Daily Roaming
Posted 13-Jul-2017 10:20


Intel unveils powerful Intel Xeon Scalable processors
Posted 12-Jul-2017 20:41



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.