![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
trig42: Not good enough.
For the price of the PS4, a fault like that should not happen within that time frame.
Reply to them advising them that you do not accep that explanation, and that under the CGA, you want them to remedy, byr repairing, replacing or refunding (at their discretion).
Have a look at this: http://www.jbhifi.co.nz/images/2014/jb-nz-20141113-consumer-guarantees.pdf
JB Hi-Fi's policy (published on their web site) says that for a device costing > $500, they, or the manufacturer will determine, at no cost to the customer, the fault, and if it is not of the Customer's making, it will be repaired. For TWO YEARS, irrespective of manufacturers warranty.
I want to know how this goes with The Warehouse, they should know better, being far and away the country's biggest retailer.
Xeon: Some relevant parts of act:
"Where goods are supplied to a consumer there is a guarantee that the goods are of acceptable quality."
"goods are of acceptable quality if they are as—
(a)fit for all the purposes for which goods of the type in question are commonly supplied"
As the PS4 ejects discs they do not meet the guarantee: 'Guarantee as to acceptable quality'. Therefore you should qualify for right of redress against the supplier as the goods fail to comply with one or more of the guarantees.
"Where a consumer has a right of redress against the supplier... the consumer may exercise the following remedies."
"Where the failure can be remedied, the consumer may—
Note the word require above.
- (a)require the supplier to remedy the failure within a reasonable time"
" (b) where a supplier who has been required to remedy a failure refuses or neglects to do so, or does not succeed in doing so within a reasonable time,—
- (i)have the failure remedied elsewhere and obtain from the supplier all reasonable costs incurred in having the failure remedied; or
If in your messages you mentioned you wanted to make the claim under the CGA you should qualify for part (b) as they refused to help you. Part (b) basically means you can choose between a refund (cash)/replacement/repair at their cost instead of them choosing one of those options.
- (ii)subject to section 20, reject the goods in accordance with section 22."
The CGA applies for a 'reasonable time' to goods (dependent on the type of goods etc) and for a console like this you could probably argue all the way to five years. Past five would be pushing it a little.
If they really don't help you then you'll have to either go to media (fair go etc.) or disputes tribunal, but unless you've damaged it then 100% you would win at disputes tribunal.
Finch: I mentioned that I should be covered under the CGA yes, however the Warehouse doesn't seem to want to accept that.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Mighty Ape | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
spudster: This may have been covered somewhere else previously, but can anyone confirm the legal position, in terms of the CGA, regarding a retailer wanting to charge a customer to assess a fault?
I'm curious to know, either while a product is within warranty period, or out of warranty but still covered under the CGA.
Also, does anyone else think $315 to assess a PS4 is excessive?
freitasm:Finch: I mentioned that I should be covered under the CGA yes, however the Warehouse doesn't seem to want to accept that.
They don't have to accept anything. It's the law, they have to do it. And because they're the retailers THEY have to deal with Sony, not you.
And as mentioned, trying to get out of it is illegal. Take them to Disputes Tribunal and be done with it.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |