![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Finch: WOOOOOOOOOOOOW
Unbelievable...
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Mighty Ape | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
Finch: Alrighty...
Anyway, it kind of went round in circles, I got his name, date + time of call etc. I told him I will probably be taking this to the DT and he said that is fine, he said currently you do not have a case (I guess because I don't know the inside out of the CGA?)
So apparently in NZ if you buy a PS4 from the Warehouse and it has problems outside of the 12 month warranty everybody should be paying $200-$360? Come on that's ridiculous.
Arghhhhhhhh!
Finch: Alrighty...
He said no that is not right because it is now out of the 12 month warranty. I said yes that is true but I am covered under the CGA. I mentioned the line of "Goods should be fit for purpose for a reasonable amount of time". I couldn't quite understand what he was saying, but what I understood from it he was saying that 12 months was a reasonable amount of time to him (And I guess Sony) and that I would have to pay. He mentioned basically everything has a 12 month warranty, TV's, Phones etc.
Glassboy:
I just read the Act, I don't see anything like the line you quote. It does cover acceptable quality, and one of provisions is durability. I don't see how you could make a case against Sony as they have complied with the FTA 1986 (warranty), and have a "reasonable" parts and repair service available.
Under the Consumer Guarantees Act, a serious fault is any problem where:
Glassboy:Finch: Alrighty...
He said no that is not right because it is now out of the 12 month warranty. I said yes that is true but I am covered under the CGA. I mentioned the line of "Goods should be fit for purpose for a reasonable amount of time". I couldn't quite understand what he was saying, but what I understood from it he was saying that 12 months was a reasonable amount of time to him (And I guess Sony) and that I would have to pay. He mentioned basically everything has a 12 month warranty, TV's, Phones etc.
I just read the Act, I don't see anything like the line you quote. It does cover acceptable quality, and one of provisions is durability. I don't see how you could make a case against Sony as they have complied with the FTA 1986 (warranty), and have a "reasonable" parts and repair service available.
Common sense is not as common as you think.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |