Jase2985:
And like i said where is the "Major Vendor" documentation that you claim. you then have to ask why does pretty much every vendor offer devices that do 2x2 in the 2.4ghz space? if that is indeed the case
If you are in the middle of nowhere and have no wireless neighbours it should work AOK. Take that same design into a city and you have an issue. The vendor assumes you know what you are doing. Unfortunately the majority of people I meet in New Zealand installing 802.11 wireless have no wireless qualifications. They don't have a CCNP Wireless or higher, CWNP or higher, etc.
On the documentation front lets take Cisco (the largest wireless vendor with over 50% or the worldwide market):
The maximum bandwidth allowed for the 2.4-GHz band is 20MHz.
Jase2985:
Its been fine on 1+5 and 8+12 for a good 5 days now, when i had it on 11 it changed strait away from 40Mhz to 20MHz so i dont think this is the issue at all as at the moment im covering all 13 channels
Let we answer your comment with a question. Assume your neighbour has an AP on channel 11 (so it is transmitting on 9, 10, 11 (centre channel), 12 and 13) and you configure your AP for channel 10 (so it is transmitting on 8, 9, 10 (centre channel), 11 and 12). You obviously have channel overlap so you will experience adjacent channel interference. Will your AP change channel to avoid the neighbour AP on channel 11?
Jase2985:
I'm happy if it performs to a non optimal level, i just want it to perform and have them realise that there is a problem.
Have you done a spectrum analysis? Channel 11 may be under heavy use or you may have a 4G cell site close to you that can adversely affect the upper 2.4 GHz channels.