Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




3 posts

Wannabe Geek


Topic # 247801 23-Feb-2019 21:55
Send private message quote this post

Current job is being restructured.  I have the option of jobs but only a week to choose which one.  I have no documentation on either job but know a rough job description and hours.  Am I supposed to get a contract to read before deciding on what job to take or am I supposed to decide on job then expect the contract to look through?

 

 

 

Thanks.


Create new topic
BDFL - Memuneh
62688 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 13370

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2186112 24-Feb-2019 01:03
8 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

You should be given a full job description for each of those and be able to read up the contract. There should be no expectation of accepting a contract without reading it.





3235 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1038

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2186118 24-Feb-2019 05:21
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

What freitasm says plus a week seems like massively short time to make a decision on such a fundamental change to your employment. I'd recommend seeking proper advice - which could be from your union if you belong to one, or an employment lawyer if you don't.


 
 
 
 


382 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 299


  Reply # 2186139 24-Feb-2019 07:18
Send private message quote this post

if your role has been disestablished then a week is fine because you have the time to spend on it. If you have not been disestablished, then a week is too short, and that’s what your consultation feedback should be.




BlinkyBill

674 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 317


  Reply # 2186146 24-Feb-2019 08:10
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Auxano:

 

Current job is being restructured.  I have the option of jobs but only a week to choose which one.

 

 

If the roles are significantly different, you also have the option of taking none.

 

On that note, changes in redundancy clauses should be given particular attention when signing new contracts.




3 posts

Wannabe Geek


  Reply # 2186161 24-Feb-2019 09:27
Send private message quote this post

Basically I'm sole charge of office, now hired young girl 2 days a week. 

 

I've asked to drop to 4 days a week.   

 

Boss is looking ahead and knowing job needs a PA next year so has now called me in and said they are restructuring (planning for future growth) so these are the 2 jobs - PA 5 days (more hours than I do) or 3 days (lot less hours than I do)

 

The long and short of it is I don't want to do more hours but boss wants me to be PA.  I said no to this at start of year.  Just want to continue.  Now this out of the blue after asking to drop to 4 days.  Wondered if I was being squeezed out so asked the question.  Answer is no, I want you for PA.

 

Feels like I'm being forced into more hours as boss knows I can't afford way less hours.  I don't want another job, I love this job.  Annoyed that I'm now pretty much forced into more work and be the PA.

 

So I was told I have a week to tell her.  But I'd like to see paperwork but I'm wondering if paperwork comes after i've committed my 'yes' to boss.

 

More than likely will be added add-ons "I'd like a 3 year comittment" etc, so would like to know how I go about doing this.

 

Don't want to cause any trouble!!!!


382 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 299


  Reply # 2186214 24-Feb-2019 10:30
4 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

You asked to reduce your hours, to four (presumably from 5) days per week. Your boss sees workload increasing. It is reasonable for employers to review the workforce against need and restructure roles against workload.

I don’t see what the problem is - you are the employee and the employer is allowed to fit the roles against her requirements, it is not up to the employer to accomodate your lifestyle choices. If working together you can’t work it out, the employer needs to find a new employee and you a new job - that’s inconvenient for each of you, but if the new requirements don’t fit then they don’t fit.

If you say ‘no’ then you will become redundant and the redundancy provisions of your existing contract kick in. Or you could accept the new role parameters until you find a job you prefer, then resign.

To be honest, and i’m not trying to be rude, but it seems like you expect the employer to shape the job to what you want, and without regard to what they want to do going forward. But where does the money to pay you come from?




BlinkyBill

gzt

10613 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1714


  Reply # 2186276 24-Feb-2019 13:31
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

You're being a bit hard there Blinkybill and missing the opportunities to negotiate where both parties win.



3 posts

Wannabe Geek


  Reply # 2186296 24-Feb-2019 14:07
Send private message quote this post

I hear what you are saying.

 

I have been under the illusion that my contract was going to be re-done (new boss) and we have been talking on and off about what it could look like and boss has asked for my input.  I have had a lot of verbal agreement from her regarding my suggestions.  So, the sit down chat and announcement that my job would be restructured was a complete shock.  My job won't change that much, apart from become more PA than it is now.  It is clear to me that this is the boss's way of forcing me into a full time PA role - one that she knows I have not been keen for, as  I don't want to increase my hours I currently work.

 

My issue:  how can I say which job I want without seeing the contract?  or...does the contract come after I've said "yes" to one of the jobs? 

 

I then worry that there will be verbals along the lines of "if you take this job I expect a 3 year commitment from you" - I've heard it talked about before.  This won't be in the contract but will be something i would have to verbally agree to.  

 

Nothing has been said to me about redundancy.  If I don't want either job is it a given there will be redundancy?  If so, why wouldn't this have been talked about?

 

Don't get me wrong,  I LOVE my job and area of work.  I don't want to leave!


382 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 299


  Reply # 2186362 24-Feb-2019 14:44
Send private message quote this post

How many hours do you work now, how many do you want to work, and how many does each of the two new jobs entail?

Also, do you have an employment contract now? If so, is it clear as to your working hours?

Verbal conditions or agreements mean nothing; if it’s not written down, there is no standing. The best thing here is to discuss the situation with your boss, and agree in writing the salient points - i.e. you take notes as to what is agreed verbally, type them up and send them to her and get her to make sure the agreement goes into your employment agreement.




BlinkyBill

3400 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 883


  Reply # 2186363 24-Feb-2019 14:46
2 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

Hey there,

I hope you’ve also been looking at the advice and guidance provided by the relevant government departments? While forums like this can be helpful, you’ll often get partial or even slanted advice (including mine, with me clearly coming from a different perspective than some of the other posts!).

Start with employment.govt.nz, which has pages like https://www.employment.govt.nz/resolving-problems/employer-and-employee-must-dos/

I’ve never worked for a small employer, but whatever the role or whatever employer I’d be expecting a position or job description, as the very first reply noted. This will (or should!) give you a clear description of what the job entails. You should also have access to a copy of the employment agreement that you are expected to sign if you do end up accepting the job, as this will contain critical components such as salary reviews and redundancy provisions.

An employer that can’t provide at least this, and provide an adequate timeframe to make important decisions such as whether to accept a new position is, in my opinion, doing a piss-poor job. This behaviour is also more likely in small businesses where employers are often ignorant (or claim ignorance) of employment law, employees often have limited knowledge or don’t have the confidence, and unions have little or no involvement.

I would carefully read all relevant information on the site I provided above, as it’s worth checking that your employer is actually following the law let alone those ‘softer’ requirements such as operating in good faith. If the restructuring process hasn’t been done properly then they’ll be on thin ice.

You can also contact MBIE for general information; see https://www.employment.govt.nz/about/contact-us/

You could also look at joining a union, who can provide you with advice or, of course, an employment lawyer or employment advocate.

But, personally, at a minimum I’d not be agreeing to anything until I have read and understood my PD and new agreement...

492 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 294


  Reply # 2186372 24-Feb-2019 15:24
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

No it’s not normal to agree to a job before seeing a contract, how are you meant to agree to something which you do not know what it entails. Ask to see both contracts.

gzt

10613 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1714


  Reply # 2186421 24-Feb-2019 17:21
Send private message quote this post

Auxano: The long and short of it is I don't want to do more hours but boss wants me to be PA. I said no to this at start of year. Just want to continue. Now this out of the blue after asking to drop to 4 days. Wondered if I was being squeezed out so asked the question. Answer is no, I want you for PA.

I'm getting the impression it's a branch office of some kind. Your boss might not be fully driving the changes. Either way there could be some local wiggle room. Combining 20 days leave with some unpaid leave if your boss is willing you can get close to 4 days a week. That's not much use if you have fixed commitments for your fifth day and might entail some flexibility on both sides. It's relatively common to work from home half a day or a day a week if it fits the role. There is obviously some goodwill there and that may lead to flexibility.

2007 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 857

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2186451 24-Feb-2019 18:33
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

This is a really difficult process at the best of times for everyone involved. It can get very emotional, which really doesn't help anyone as it can become confrontational rather than working on sorting out the topic to the best mutual result.

 

Have you been formally notified that your role has been disestablished? This should have been done in writing.

 

Personally I would do the following. Firstly I'd request, in writing, the job descriptions and conditions (ie contract) for both roles. If you don't have everything in writing then it is all just hearsay. Once you the options in writing then you can make decisions around what works best for you and negotiate the best possible outcome for you.

 

Verbal three year commitments etc are just your manager manipulating you using guilt. It's a different circumstance if you have applied for a role but if your role is being disestablished and you aren't offered something that works for you IMO you are behaving in an ethical way to take the role that pays your bills while searching for another role. This isn't a marriage - as Blinky Bill said you can't expect a business to adapt it's needs to suit you but it is also not fair for them to expect you to stay in a role if you are not happy.

 

You can always use the "I thought it would be ok but it isn't working out the way I expected" excuse if you resign.

 

The best advice I can give is try and stay unemotional while you are having discussions with your manager and take copious notes. It's best to get them to agree with what you have written but diary notes are admissible, especially if they are consistent (taken after every meet, showing discussions that are both in your favour and not etc)  and taken regularly. Coupled with emails etc they can show a pattern which could be used in court if things get nasty,

 

You are also entitled to have a support person present when you are having employment discussions like this, which can be very helpful if you find these types of topics challenging to talk about. Good luck, this isn't easy (for the company either), I hope it comes to a good outcome.


495 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 262


  Reply # 2186468 24-Feb-2019 19:35
Send private message quote this post

There's no such thing as a 3 year, or any year, commitment. Your boss might like to think they can say that, but they can't. I doubt you could even legally put that in a contract.

I've worked for two small companies and both times they had no clue when it came to HR processes and obligations. Not sure if that's tour situation but the manager sounds a bit amateur.

I've also not applied for jobs when they have not been able to provide a job description, always a red flag imo.

gzt

10613 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1714


  Reply # 2186500 24-Feb-2019 21:08
Send private message quote this post

It's well worth engaging a competent employment lawyer to gain some certainty about your situation and know the ground you are standing on. This discussion is good but only legal advice can give you that certainty.

Create new topic


Donate via Givealittle


Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Amazon introduces new Kindle with adjustable front light
Posted 21-Mar-2019 20:14


A call from the companies providing internet access for the great majority of New Zealanders, to the companies with the greatest influence over social media content
Posted 19-Mar-2019 15:21


Two e-scooter companies selected for Wellington trial
Posted 15-Mar-2019 17:33


GeForce GTX 1660 available now
Posted 15-Mar-2019 08:47


Artificial Intelligence to double the rate of innovation in New Zealand by 2021
Posted 13-Mar-2019 14:47


LG demonstrates smart home concepts at LG InnoFest
Posted 13-Mar-2019 14:45


New Zealanders buying more expensive smartphones
Posted 11-Mar-2019 09:52


2degrees Offers Amazon Prime Video to Broadband Customers
Posted 8-Mar-2019 14:10


D-Link ANZ launches D-Fend AC2600 Wi-Fi Router Protected by McAfee
Posted 7-Mar-2019 11:09


Slingshot commissions celebrities to design new modems
Posted 5-Mar-2019 08:58


Symantec Annual Threat Report reveals more ambitious, destructive and stealthy attacks
Posted 28-Feb-2019 10:14


FUJIFILM launches high performing X-T30
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:40


Netflix is killing content piracy says research
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:33


Trend Micro finds shifting threats require kiwis to rethink security priorities
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:27


Mainfreight uses Spark IoT Asset Tracking service
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:25



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.