richms: Dont blame telecom, blame the commerce commission.
It seems ridiculous that telecom are using those low specs for their own customers when any other ISP can put their own dslam in and do what they want for backhaul, yet telecom are choosing to use the low quality option they are forced to sell to other ISPs.
Has any other ISP negotiated another contract that has higher backhaul or are they all using the service dimensioned by beancounters at the commerce commision?
Going well OT here...
Surely the Comcom have only specified minimum levels of performance (which may well be out of date given the growth in broadband use) for the handover links, and it is Telecom that are rate limiting to a 45 kbps/customer maximum. By doing this aren't they just inviting the comcom to revisit the minimum level of performance. If they wanted to get onside with their wholesale customers then I thought they wouldn't do something like this, they seem to be inviting their customers to go running back to the comcom.
It seems a huge waste to me to invest so much in the cabinetisation process to hobble the whole system with 45 kbps handover links.