Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




6169 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2894

Subscriber

Topic # 80675 2-Apr-2011 17:16
Send private message

I'm thinking about getting a Freeview decoder but don't understand why HD is only available via UHF, which may or may not be available at my location (the maps don't help, they just say maybe or maybe not).

Can anyone explain more about this to me? Why is HD available on Sky but not on satellite Freeview, and why are there no apparent plans to change this? Is it a matter of money, or available bandwidth, or something else?




I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


Create new topic
1464 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 125

Trusted

  Reply # 454555 2-Apr-2011 17:31
Send private message

Costs to much.

Can you get prime via UHF? If so then you SHOULD get HD via UHF.




CPU: Intel 3770k| RAM: F3-2400C10D-16GTX G.Skill Trident X |MB:  Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H-WB | GFX: GV-N660OC-2GD gv-n660oc-2gd GeForce GTX 660 | Monitor: Qnix 27" 2560x1440

 

Want to be with an awesome ISP? Want $20 credit too? Use this link to sign up to BigPipe.


25816 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5546

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 454560 2-Apr-2011 17:45
Send private message

Freeview|HD via UHF is the primary broadcast platform to replace the VHF & UHF broadcasts with expansion to 87% of the population by August.

Cost and lack of capacity are the two main factors behind no HD on DVB-S - there is probably no sustainable business case to deploy multiple MUX's on DVB-S to deliver HD programming to 13% of the population. There was never any intention to deliver HD programming over DVB-S, and it would also mean newer STB's to support the DVB-S2 format.

 
 
 
 


727 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  Reply # 454563 2-Apr-2011 18:11
Send private message

The capacity argument doesn't fly. Much of the material is already being broadcast in HD from Optus D1. The problem is, it is encrypted by Sky. All that is required is for Freeview to do a deal with Sky to remove the encryption on the streams that are also available FTA.

I'm not holding my breath for that to happen though. Freeview is essentially a hollow brand; the "face" of the digital changeover. It has no real backing, no substance, and no control over content or transmission.


917 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 38


  Reply # 454573 2-Apr-2011 18:50
Send private message

They've committed themselves to MPEG-2 SD broadcasting on Freeview Satellite and it isn't commercially viable for them to supplement that now. Most of the 14% of the population without Freeview|HD coverage are going to be Sky subscribers and TVNZ now wants you to subscribe to Sky. I expect Freeview|HD may be expanded further after the analogue switchoff, and HDTV across DSL should arrive eventually to some of those without UHF reception.

I think they could have just managed 720p HD on Freeview Satellite if they had gone with MPEG-4 broadcasting and ditched the regional-advertising broadcasts. They made a short-termitus decision to go with MPEG-2 because low-tech satellite receivers are cheaper. None of the Freeview approved satellite receivers have HDMI and there're still no MyFreeview Satellite recorders which doesn't reflect well on Freeview.

25816 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5546

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 454577 2-Apr-2011 18:57
Send private message

xarqi: The capacity argument doesn't fly. Much of the material is already being broadcast in HD from Optus D1. The problem is, it is encrypted by Sky. All that is required is for Freeview to do a deal with Sky to remove the encryption on the streams that are also available FTA.

I'm not holding my breath for that to happen though. Freeview is essentially a hollow brand; the "face" of the digital changeover. It has no real backing, no substance, and no control over content or transmission. 
 
 


You're assuming that Freeview is a competitior for Sky, something it most certainly is not.

You're entirely correct that Freeview has no control over content - and that's exactly how it should be. Freeview is not a broadcaster, it's a broadcast flatform.

   

727 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  Reply # 454580 2-Apr-2011 19:11
Send private message

Sigh - I'll just have to make do with the excellent programming from SBS (1 SD channel; 1 HD) and my excellent non-Freeview approved satellite recorder.

I just hope SBS don't pull the plug any time soon.

727 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  Reply # 454582 2-Apr-2011 19:20
Send private message

sbiddle: 

You're assuming that Freeview is a competitior for Sky, something it most certainly is not.


No, I've not made that assumption at all.  What I've assumed is that if the Freeview consortium members wished to provide their content in HD FTA, by satellite, they may be able to do so by reaching an accommodation with Sky.

Freeview: "OK Sky, it's like this - we'll let you continue to broadcast our content on your platform, but you can't encrypt it.  Otherwise - forget it." 

Possibility 1:
Sky: "Meanies - OK then - if you insist."

Possibility 2:
Sky: "You're joking right?  We're broadcasting your content as a service to you, and you want us to get nothing at all for it?  We're in business here; what is it you do again?"

1466 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 454603 2-Apr-2011 20:27
Send private message

It would have to be one hell of a deal for Sky to allow non-subscribers to access the free to air HD feeds.

One of the main reasons I pay for Sky is the HD.

It's a bit like cordless phones and TV remotes without wires (sorry unless you are about 38 or older you probably won't remember wired remotes).

Once you have had them it's hard to go back, same with HD vs SD, especially as the SD sat feed doesn't seem to be that great anyway.

It would be really nice to think a deal could be done but Sky would be shooting themselves in the foot.

Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

$3.74 million for new electric vehicles in New Zealand
Posted 17-Jan-2018 11:27


Nova 2i: Value, not excitement from Huawei
Posted 17-Jan-2018 09:02


Less news in Facebook News Feed revamp
Posted 15-Jan-2018 13:15


Australian Government contract awarded to Datacom Connect
Posted 11-Jan-2018 08:37


Why New Zealand needs a chief technology officer
Posted 6-Jan-2018 13:59


Amazon release Silk Browser and Firefox for Fire TV
Posted 21-Dec-2017 13:42


New Chief Technology Officer role created
Posted 19-Dec-2017 22:18


All I want for Christmas is a new EV
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:54


How clever is this: AI will create 2.3 million jobs by 2020
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:52


NOW to deploy SD-WAN to regional councils
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:46


Mobile market competition issues ComCom should watch
Posted 18-Dec-2017 10:52


New Zealand government to create digital advisory group
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:47


Australia datum changes means whole country moving 1.8 metres north-east
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:39


UAV Traffic Management Trial launching today in New Zealand
Posted 12-Dec-2017 16:06


UFB connections pass 460,000
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:26



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.