Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
287 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 34


  Reply # 313228 30-Mar-2010 22:44
Send private message

Quidam: I'd also say that if there is one thing Sky doesn't want, it's bad publicity. For this reason alone, if there was even a hint that this could be taken to the wider media, you might find that they call off the attack dogs in spectacular fashion.


History says otherwise - Sky seem to get far too much pleasure out of fighting dirty. They usually target at their competitors, but customers are advised not get in the way either.

If you really want this issue broadcast (as opposed to just blogged about) then your best bets would be Media7 on TVNZ7 or Mediawatch on National Radio. It's far, far, far too technical for Close Up, Fair Go etc. Attempting to visualise the Target special on EPG redistribution rights has given me an uncontrollable case of the shudders...




A time-poor geek is hardly a geek at all

40 posts

Geek


  Reply # 313357 31-Mar-2010 09:24
Send private message

wazzageek: 
As my guess ... I would assuming that they sell the license to re-distribute scheduling information to other publications (not just on the intarwebnets) - local papers, the Listener, TV Guide, etc.

Perhaps the legal team is worried about the non-intarwebnet publications learning about a precedent being set where an entity can retrieve the scheduling information for free that a source of revenue will be lost?

Maybe I wrong on that count - but it's the only real justification I can think of. 


Perhaps, but at least some of those publications would need to get the information more than 8 days in advance in order to meet printing deadlines. For that there is no free alternative.

1985 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 265

Subscriber

  Reply # 313446 31-Mar-2010 12:17
Send private message

Plasmadog:
wazzageek: 
As my guess ... I would assuming that they sell the license to re-distribute scheduling information to other publications (not just on the intarwebnets) - local papers, the Listener, TV Guide, etc.

Perhaps the legal team is worried about the non-intarwebnet publications learning about a precedent being set where an entity can retrieve the scheduling information for free that a source of revenue will be lost?

Maybe I wrong on that count - but it's the only real justification I can think of. 


Perhaps, but at least some of those publications would need to get the information more than 8 days in advance in order to meet printing deadlines. For that there is no free alternative.


And the publications are profiting from it.  Us HTPC owners are not...

33 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 314105 2-Apr-2010 10:26
Send private message

I know the chap that does the MediaWatch show on National. Unfortunately I'm in ALK atm, but when I return to wgtn next week I'll have a chat to him about it.

638 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 78

Trusted

  Reply # 316001 8-Apr-2010 00:12
Send private message

All this validates my deliberate decision to avoid SkyTV since they mucked me around once too often in 2004. It appears to only be getting more and more silly.
Best of luck to reven!!




1818 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 52

Trusted

  Reply # 316212 8-Apr-2010 14:07
Send private message

I see KiwiBlog as mentioned this, http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/04/sky_vs_reven.html

3365 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1841

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 316886 10-Apr-2010 22:02
Send private message

Yet another reason why we need to change the law so that the concepts of copyright, IP, and patents only apply to commercial for profit entites, and hobbyist and personal use of anything is always fair use.




Information wants to be free. The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.


217 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 2


  Reply # 316938 11-Apr-2010 08:24
Send private message

Lias: Yet another reason why we need to change the law so that the concepts of copyright, IP, and patents only apply to commercial for profit entites, and hobbyist and personal use of anything is always fair use.


It's not that simple unfortunately.

Open Source is a good example. Things can be copyrighted and then made available under a specific license. If copyright, IP, and patents only applied to commercial for-profit entities, then Open Source movements would be excluded. Sure, they could then pilfer from commercial software without fear, but they also couldn't protect their own software licensing.

85 posts

Master Geek


  Reply # 317495 12-Apr-2010 20:19
Send private message

reven: uploaded v3.1 of xmltvnz to google code
http://code.google.com/p/xmltvnz
which now supports rss feeds for automatic updates (user configurable location of rss feed)

there is no configuration file (other than a dummy sample) hosted there, you will have to find it yourself.



is anybody else getting this error when clicking the link??

Forbidden
Your client does not have permission to get URL

 

Go Hawks!
881 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 51

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 317499 12-Apr-2010 20:22
Send private message

jamesla:
reven: uploaded v3.1 of xmltvnz to google code
http://code.google.com/p/xmltvnz
which now supports rss feeds for automatic updates (user configurable location of rss feed)

there is no configuration file (other than a dummy sample) hosted there, you will have to find it yourself.



is anybody else getting this error when clicking the link??

Forbidden
Your client does not have permission to get URL

 


Yes.  Perhaps the site is in the process of being refreshed? 

85 posts

Master Geek


  Reply # 317504 12-Apr-2010 20:30
Send private message

its been like that since saturday for me



3372 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 652

Trusted

  Reply # 317618 13-Apr-2010 08:12
Send private message

sky made me take it off of google code

352 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 317619 13-Apr-2010 08:15
Send private message

reven: sky made me take it off of google code


What? They contacted you again, after their initial contact?

Bullies

371 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 317620 13-Apr-2010 08:17
Send private message

This really is bully-boy tactics - we as the greater community need to stand up to these guys.




My HTPC - Case Antec Fusion Remote, MOBO Intel DH67BLB3, CPU Intel Core i5-2400S 2.5 GHz, RAM 8GB  DDR3 1333, HDD 120Gig Corsair Force Series 3 SSD system | WD Caviar Black 2TB data, Tuners Black Gold BGT3595 dual DVB-S/S2, dual DVB-T, Video nVIDIA GeForce GT 520, 1024MB, Sound Intel® High Definition Audio (onboard), OS Windows 7 x64



3372 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 652

Trusted

  Reply # 317636 13-Apr-2010 09:09
Send private message

rvangelder:
reven: sky made me take it off of google code


What? They contacted you again, after their initial contact?

Bullies


yeah there was quite the back and forth, I kept trying to compromise with them and take down anything to do with sky or NZ and EPG.  but in the end it wasnt worth the risk of them trying to come after me.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.