Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


saeran

139 posts

Master Geek


#154652 3-Nov-2014 16:46
Send private message

2degrees say they'll be locking phones now, they have been 'forced' to by their competitors.  Not a fan of the practice, but I guess the 'everyday consumer' probably doesn't care.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/10694243/2degrees-forced-to-lock-phones


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3
jeffnz
2869 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1167788 3-Nov-2014 16:51
Send private message

Don't see it as an issue at all, if you get a subsidized phone why wouldn't it be locked. Alternative is to pay full retail for phone and go where you like, or just pay the $30




Galaxy S10

 

Garmin  Fenix 5




MikeB4
15555 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1167792 3-Nov-2014 16:56
Send private message

As long as the purchaser knows upfront that it's locked etc and are making an informed choice I see no issue.

 
 
 
 


kiwitrc
4123 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1167793 3-Nov-2014 17:01
Send private message

Its not compulsory, you can get a phone elsewhere.

RunningMan
6141 posts

Uber Geek


  #1167799 3-Nov-2014 17:05
Send private message

I also don't like the concept, however can certainly understand the business reasons for it. If you are going to subsidise a phone, then it's reasonable to expect a return on investment over the next months.

Unlocking for free after 9 months seems quite reasonable in comparison to some overseas operators - last time I checked some of the major overseas ones either wouldn't unlock (at all), or charged a significant fee even for an elderly phone.

saeran

139 posts

Master Geek


  #1167803 3-Nov-2014 17:08
Send private message

Unlocking for free after 9 months seems quite reasonable in comparison to some overseas operators - last time I checked some of the major overseas ones either wouldn't unlock (at all), or charged a significant fee even for an elderly phone.


Yeah the free unlock after 9 months does make it somewhat better – but it's still not ideal.

2degreesCare
1537 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
2degrees

  #1167834 3-Nov-2014 18:04
Send private message

KiwiNZ: As long as the purchaser knows upfront that it's locked etc and are making an informed choice I see no issue.


Phones that are locked, see below, will be clearly marked as 'locked' in our retail and online stores. 

 

  • Samsung Galaxy V
  • Huawei Y320
  • Huawei Y520
  • Alcatel 2052
Over the last couple of years, handset locking has unfortunately become an increasingly common practice by our competitors, with one sub-brand now locking all of its 3G Android handsets.  This means we have been left with no choice but to start locking some of our own handset range given a locked handset can be, in some cases, much cheaper than our unlocked equivalent.

This is a step 2degrees doesn't want to take, we fought hard against handset locking in 2008 and in 2011, in both cases asking the Commerce Commission to act.

It will be free to unlock a handset as long as it is at least nine months after you purchased it (you'll be able to check the exact date by texting 'check' to 299) and cost $30 to unlock a phone that that was purchased less than nine months ago.  If you’re Prepay this will come from your Top Up credit.  If you’re Pay Monthly this will be charged to your next bill.

Regards
^POB

NikT
1670 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1167916 3-Nov-2014 19:06
Send private message

I'm almost in favour of SIM locking because it avoids all of the problems that some folk face when expecting a handset, particularly a low cost one, to work perfectly on another network it was not set up for. The way this has been approached in NZ to date is transparent and simple. $30.00 fee, or wait nine months - a great precedent for Skinny to have set for the market, IMO. This is a far cry from the business practices in other countries, particularly in the US, where it can be incredibly difficult or even impossible to get a handset unlocked. Codes need to be requested from mysterious teams, can take months to arrive, and require an active postpaid account in good standing - if you're lucky.

Here, it's the same approach from all three networks, and has resulted in some extremely competitive pricing for entry-level devices. I've purchased phones for family for under $10.00, and that just wouldn't be possible if the return on investment wasn't guaranteed. Those who see this as a slippery slope should take a close look at the way this is implemented in other markets. I don't see that happening here.




Product Manager @ PB Tech

https://pbtech.co.nz/smartphones


 
 
 
 


NonprayingMantis
6434 posts

Uber Geek


  #1167955 3-Nov-2014 19:44
Send private message

As long as the subsidy on the phone that justifies the sim-lock is genuine (i.e. the phone is sold for no profit, or even at a loss) , then I think it's absolutely fine, and in actual fact I'd go further and say that sim-locking done this way is a very good thing since it allows people who otherwise would not buy a phone the ability to get one.  
Anything that makes mobile phones more accessible to poor people is a very good thing.  

As for whether the subsidies are genuine in this case, it seems like 2Degrees position proves that VF/Spark/Skinny absolutely ARE subsidising the phones which is what has forced them to respond.  (if the subsidy was 'fake' then 2D could match the pricing without requiring the locking.)

richms
23681 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1167962 3-Nov-2014 20:02
Send private message

I just find it funny how 2 degrees have become exactly what their first lots of advertising said they were not.




Richard rich.ms

NonprayingMantis
6434 posts

Uber Geek


  #1167980 3-Nov-2014 20:37
Send private message

richms: I just find it funny how 2 degrees have become exactly what their first lots of advertising said they were not.

They've been doing that for ages - contracts, complex plans, on-net benefits.  

All things they said they wouldn't do.  All things they have done.

sbiddle
29282 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #1168003 3-Nov-2014 20:56
Send private message

I don't see the big deal or why so many people are making such a big fuss. You buy something that subsidised and if you're not happy you can pay the $30 fee and get it unlocked - it's as simple as that.



alasta
4787 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1168023 3-Nov-2014 21:18
Send private message

I take it we can assume that anything bought at full retail price will not be locked?

khull
1245 posts

Uber Geek


  #1168026 3-Nov-2014 21:25
Send private message

alasta: I take it we can assume that anything bought at full retail price will not be locked?


for now - we are one step away from that. I have bought handsets outright from OZ that are locked to a network and require an extra day processing to get it unlocked from the carrier.


In my view we are going backwards. It may sound harsh to do away with subsidies but I think selling subsidised phones w contract (if it heads down that slippery path) to a target market with already constrained disposable incomes is not the right idea either



ojo

ojo
126 posts

Master Geek


  #1168033 3-Nov-2014 21:55
Send private message

Funny how they can be "forced" into locking phones, but not into matching their competitors' deals.

old3eyes
8476 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #1168214 4-Nov-2014 09:03
Send private message

I don't support 2Ds argument that Spark and Vodafone are doing it then we should as well.   I don't really have an problem with  this as it only effect the low end phones and the people who buy these   most likely  only use them on casual prepay as well..  I would hate to see this eventually creep up the  model numbers so that we end up like the US or AU  where they are all locked..




Regards,

Old3eyes


 1 | 2 | 3
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News »

Huawei launches IdeaHub Pro in New Zealand
Posted 27-Oct-2020 16:41


Southland-based IT specialist providing virtual services worldwide
Posted 27-Oct-2020 15:55


NASA discovers water on sunlit surface of Moon
Posted 27-Oct-2020 08:30


Huawei introduces new features to Petal Search, Maps and Docs
Posted 26-Oct-2020 18:05


Nokia selected by NASA to build first ever cellular network on the Moon
Posted 21-Oct-2020 08:34


Nanoleaf enhances lighting line with launch of Triangles and Mini Triangles
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:18


Synology unveils DS16211+
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:12


Ingram Micro introduces FootfallCam to New Zealand channel
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:06


Dropbox adopts Virtual First working policy
Posted 17-Oct-2020 19:47


OPPO announces Reno4 Series 5G line-up in NZ
Posted 16-Oct-2020 08:52


Microsoft Highway to a Hundred expands to Asia Pacific
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:34


Spark turns on 5G in Auckland
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:29


AMD Launches AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Desktop Processors
Posted 9-Oct-2020 10:13


Teletrac Navman launches integrated multi-camera solution for transport and logistics industry
Posted 8-Oct-2020 10:57


Farmside hits 10,000 RBI customers
Posted 7-Oct-2020 15:32









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.