Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23
8020 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 384

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1067693 17-Jun-2014 16:33
Send private message

danielwd: I don't understand why people take such risks with these start-up hosting providers.

Isn't their business worth a few more dollars a month to stay online?


Every business has to start somewhere, people basically took the same risk using say Web Drive in the 90's wink

69 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 10


  Reply # 1067697 17-Jun-2014 16:37
Send private message

Ragnor:
danielwd: I don't understand why people take such risks with these start-up hosting providers.

Isn't their business worth a few more dollars a month to stay online?


Every business has to start somewhere, people basically took the same risk using say Web Drive in the 90's wink



I agree.

Most of my sites are with OpenHost but I don't mind trying smaller players to see how they go. A lot of sites won't have proper business plans let alone regular incomes - so I guess the less they pay for hosting the longer they can keep going and hope they "make it big"...



 
 
 
 


46 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  Reply # 1067698 17-Jun-2014 16:39
Send private message

Ragnor:
danielwd: I don't understand why people take such risks with these start-up hosting providers.

Isn't their business worth a few more dollars a month to stay online?


Every business has to start somewhere, people basically took the same risk using say Web Drive in the 90's wink


Veeeeeeeeery different landscape back then. Websites and email weren't critical services like they are now.
But yes, in 1999 we were offline for a week due to a server failure/hacking incident. Lesson learned.

12591 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1417


  Reply # 1067704 17-Jun-2014 16:42
Send private message

sifly:
Ragnor:
danielwd: I don't understand why people take such risks with these start-up hosting providers.

Isn't their business worth a few more dollars a month to stay online?


Every business has to start somewhere, people basically took the same risk using say Web Drive in the 90's wink



I agree.

Most of my sites are with OpenHost but I don't mind trying smaller players to see how they go. A lot of sites won't have proper business plans let alone regular incomes - so I guess the less they pay for hosting the longer they can keep going and hope they "make it big"...




These days companies need their website and email to be as reliable as their phone line. It was different, say 10 years ago.

69 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 10


  Reply # 1067706 17-Jun-2014 16:43
Send private message

danielwd:
Ragnor:
danielwd: I don't understand why people take such risks with these start-up hosting providers.

Isn't their business worth a few more dollars a month to stay online?


Every business has to start somewhere, people basically took the same risk using say Web Drive in the 90's wink


Veeeeeeeeery different landscape back then. Websites and email weren't critical services like they are now.
But yes, in 1999 we were offline for a week due to a server failure/hacking incident. Lesson learned.




Goes to show then doesn't it. Nobody is impervious to something happening. It's how it is reacted to and resolved is usually the key. There is room for cheap hosting in the market - but astute business acumen is required. Just "having the knowledge" on how to run a web farm doesn't cut it...

46 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  Reply # 1067713 17-Jun-2014 16:54
Send private message

Being "able to run" a web hosting service doesn't mean you should.

Obviously there are so many 247s and Hostbees because around it is so easy to start up with no HR and no investment.

69 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 10


  Reply # 1067716 17-Jun-2014 16:57
Send private message



These days companies need their website and email to be as reliable as their phone line. It was different, say 10 years ago.



Are you saying those that paid thousands (probably) for the sites years ago would be no more pissed off than someone today? No. There are just more of them so the noise is louder. But these days it is a lot easier for any old hack to put a website up and let it run. They probably only check it 2-3 times a month. The point is, there is a market for low cost hosting - that is obvious. It's all about management.


Just sitting there telling everyone how big your sword is (not you per se) does not make you any more reliable, capable or likely to be better than the next person. Plenty of small businesses have started off out of someone else's misery and done very well. Plenty of businesses have been around for 20 years and not really advanced anywhere - but they keep going.




69 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 10


  Reply # 1067717 17-Jun-2014 16:58
Send private message

danielwd: Being "able to run" a web hosting service doesn't mean you should.

Obviously there are so many 247s and Hostbees because around it is so easy to start up with no HR and no investment.



And again - just because Hostbee is reselling, you assume they have made no investment? Or contributed to HR?

12591 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1417


  Reply # 1067732 17-Jun-2014 17:10
Send private message

sifly: 


Are you saying those that paid thousands (probably) for the sites years ago would be no more pissed off than someone today? 





Yes, because 10-15 years ago, hosting/servers/networks were not as reliable as they are today, nor was computing in general. (eg. computers crashing during usage was relatively normal). So people did expect that things may go down,as they had nothing to compare it with. As technology has improved and reliability too, and more providers have come into the market, so peoples expectations have also risen a lot. There are also a lot more people now with websites, and along with social media, there is more of a voice.
Also peoples websites now do a lot more, eg online booking, online ordering etc, so are more business critical. In the old days, most websites were simply online brochures, so weren't really business critical.

79 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 17


  Reply # 1068561 18-Jun-2014 15:25
Send private message

sifly:
danielwd: Being "able to run" a web hosting service doesn't mean you should.

Obviously there are so many 247s and Hostbees because around it is so easy to start up with no HR and no investment.



And again - just because Hostbee is reselling, you assume they have made no investment? Or contributed to HR?


That's not the only reason to make that assumption.  The platform is pretty transparent.  Their HR isn't readily published and they don't have an office.  That usually indicates a one or two man band.  

69 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 10


  Reply # 1068591 18-Jun-2014 15:47
Send private message

Not having an office - not a great look, but not a deal breaker for a start-up (I would suggest most resellers don't have commercial offices).

Not publishing HR is a crime with most hosts in this country.

"Edited due to talking to wrong person..."

Most big players resell. I cant see the issue here...


12591 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1417


  Reply # 1068612 18-Jun-2014 15:58
One person supports this post
Send private message

sifly:

Not publishing HR is a crime 



Most companies across most sectors won't publish HR, even big ones. I don't see that as an issue. It is also possibly due to privacy. When I speak on the phone to some orgainsations, and ask for their name, they will often only provide the first name, and they say they can't give their last name.

69 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 10


  Reply # 1068627 18-Jun-2014 16:02
Send private message

mattwnz:
sifly:

Not publishing HR is a crime 



Most companies across most sectors won't publish HR, even big ones. I don't see that as an issue. It is also possibly due to privacy. When I speak on the phone to some orgainsations, and ask for their name, they will often only provide the first name, and they say they can't give their last name.


And I did mean "crime" in a very light sense. I certainly don't expect private companies to publish who they have at their beck and call. In fact, with information sensitive businesses, I'd be very surprised if they did...




46 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  Reply # 1068642 18-Jun-2014 16:20
Send private message

When I speak on the phone to some orgainsations, and ask for their name, they will often only provide the first name, and they say they can't give their last name.


This is getting really precious. It's usually a way of avoiding any personal responsibility. "John who?"

12591 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1417


  Reply # 1068650 18-Jun-2014 16:42
Send private message

danielwd:
When I speak on the phone to some orgainsations, and ask for their name, they will often only provide the first name, and they say they can't give their last name.


This is getting really precious. It's usually a way of avoiding any personal responsibility. "John who?"


Not sure what you mean. However when I speak to someone on the phone, I will record their name for future reference incase I need to follow it up, as the organisation may have more than one person with the first name. eg. For John, there maybe 10 Johns working for the company. Without knowing the last name, it will be a case of 'John who?' Although with some companies, you are lucky to even get a first name, and they may reply to an email with just 'Support' as the name.

1 | ... | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

NotPetya ransomware attack, New Zealand view
Posted 28-Jun-2017 15:07


Security concerns reach new peak, Unisys Security Index
Posted 27-Jun-2017 14:11


Behind Spark’s slow-burn 4.5G plan
Posted 26-Jun-2017 16:23


Red Hat unveils production-ready open source hyperconverged infrastructure
Posted 23-Jun-2017 22:10


Whatever ailed Vodafone broadband … seems to be fixed
Posted 23-Jun-2017 14:10


VMware NSX Meets Stringent Government Security Standards with Common Criteria Certification
Posted 22-Jun-2017 19:05


Brother launches next-generation colour laser printers and all-in- ones for business
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:56


Intel and IOC announce partnership
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:50


Samsung Galaxy Tab S3: Best Android tablet
Posted 21-Jun-2017 12:05


Wellington-based company helping secure Microsoft browsers
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:51


Endace delivers high performance with new 1/10/40 Gbps packet capture card
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:50


You can now integrate SMX security into Microsoft Office 365, Google and other cloud email platforms
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:47


Ravensdown launches new decision-making tool HawkEye
Posted 19-Jun-2017 15:38


Spark planning to take on direct management of all consumer stores
Posted 19-Jun-2017 10:03


Qrious acquires Ubiquity
Posted 14-Jun-2017 12:21



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.