Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
56 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 8

  Reply # 686147 14-Sep-2012 20:27
Send private message

eg: Changing the size, shape, or location of the agitator (compared to other manufacturers models), with the resulting change having the desired 50% beneficial effect?

Soo for my competing product I would have to make a physical change and an algometric (software) one in order to compete?  

Presumably I could then patent this combination?
Or, seeing as this simply confirmed the 50% efficiency gain of other designs is it not viewed as a 'new' idea, and therefore un-patentable?

I'll extend that question and ask if making a physical change OR an algorithmic one is sufficient?


The 50% is a bit of a red herring and not really important to the invention here other than to confirm that your solution does indeed overcome the problem.

As for whether “a physical change OR an algorithmic one is sufficient” - It all depends on the nature of the problem and the solution.

In our washing machine scenario simply exchanging one algorithm for another is not sufficient to get you a patent of your own but it may be sufficient (depending on the scope of the claims) to mean you are not infringing my patent.

If you made a physical change which is itself novel and inventive (i.e. your physical change is overcoming some other problem or the same problem but in a different way) then this would be sufficient to get you your own patent.

Lets look at a scenario:

If the invention is to mount the agitator horizontally and no one else has done this before (this is hypothetical because I'm sure this would have been tried before) then the invention is potentially patentable. There are inventive step issues to consider, for example, are you simply realizing some (hypothetical) well known fact that it is more efficient to mount a motor sideways - if so, not patentable. Lets assume the invention here is both novel and inventive (This is a strong assumption and not one to be taken lightly. In reality something this broad, like the singular concept of mounting an agitator horizontally, would rarely be novel and/or inventive. Dealing with hypotheticals and having no prior art to look at makes it very difficult to come up with all the reasons why the invention might be considered obvious [Note: inventive step and obviousness are synonyms in the patent world]).

But if we are saying that it is novel and inventive then the inventor could claim "a computer implemented method for controlling a horizontally mounted agitator with method steps a) ... b) ... and c)....". This covers all algorithms which perform steps a), b) and c). If mounting the agitator horizontally really was a ground breaking invention then a), b) and c) could framed broad enough to cover almost all algorithms. Hopefully you can appreciate that the algorithm here is secondary and not what the monopoly is being granted for (there may be copyright in the code - this is a different issue - but it is not the code which makes the invention novel).

I will try to think of another scenario which explores a more intangible problem/solution.

56 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 8

  Reply # 686174 14-Sep-2012 21:12
Send private message

Why then aren't Authors and Artists up in arms about the woefully inadequate protection of their works?

They are aren't they? :P
On a serious note, my knowledge of copyright law is pretty limited - it's a much murkier topic and the boundries of protection/infringement are more difficult to determine.

Surely by allowing this, even in a limited sense that you believe will avoid most "bad" patents, a few might slip through the cracks?  And all a patent troll needs is a couple of bad, obfuscated patents and an army of lawyers, enough to scare the small guy into paying license fees to avoid litigation?

No doubt some "bad" patents will slip through but the new Patents Act (technically still a 'Bill' I suppose) provides several processes for a third party challenge to a patent application or patent. These are opposition before grant (small cost - if you represent yourself), re-examination before grant (small cost - likely less than the initial cost of examination), assertion (by submission) before acceptance (free), revocation before the Commissioner (some cost - lawers start to get involved here though there is still potential for you to represent yourself) or Court (expensive), and re-examination after grant (small cost - likely less than the initial cost of examination).


1923 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 139

  Reply # 686181 14-Sep-2012 21:33
Send private message

So back to the washing machine...(you're stuck with it now). What's to stop me getting a patent for my innovation in (say) the USA, where it appears the patent test is less rigorous, and on the back of that getting a local patent?

(Edit: spelling)

2057 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 486

  Reply # 686197 14-Sep-2012 22:02
Send private message

sidefx: Wow, great to hear from someone in the know, who's obviously familar with all of the this and given it some good thought. A couple of questions if I may:


Thanks for all your explanations MrMistofeles this is great reading

1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:

News »

Air New Zealand experiments with blockchain technology
Posted 23-Nov-2017 15:39

Symantec selects Amazon Web Services to deliver cloud security
Posted 23-Nov-2017 10:40

New Zealand Ministry of Education chooses Unisys for cloud-based education resourcing management system
Posted 22-Nov-2017 22:00

Business analytics software powers profits for NZ wine producers
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:52

Pyrios strikes up alliance with Microsoft integrator UC Logiq
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:51

The New Zealand IT services ecosystem - it's all digital down here
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:49

Volvo to supply tens of thousands of autonomous drive compatible cars to Uber
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:46

From small to medium and beyond: Navigating the ERP battlefield
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:12

Business owners: ERP software selection starts (and finishes) with you
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:11

Why I'm not an early adopter
Posted 21-Nov-2017 10:39

Netatmo launches smart home products in New Zealand
Posted 20-Nov-2017 20:06

Huawei Mate 10: Punchy, long battery life, artificial intelligence
Posted 20-Nov-2017 16:30

Propel launch Disney Star Wars Laser Battle Drones
Posted 19-Nov-2017 21:26

UFB killer app: Speed
Posted 17-Nov-2017 17:01

The case for RSS — MacSparky
Posted 13-Nov-2017 14:35

Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.