KiwiNZ:freitasm:networkn: So your argument is that because she has resources (for the sake of clarity let's call that money), to hire a lawyer to have this taken down? I believe your example is in the extreme and would be seen by the courts for what it would be.
I doubt courts will see that. Judges follow the letter of the law, not its intent. A good lawyer will put an argument to the judge that this person is "suffering" and will get the article taken down.
Do you really believe people are infallible?
The role of the Judge is to interpret the Law, hence precedents.
Exactly the point I was trying to make.