Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
6433 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1570


  Reply # 1096172 26-Jul-2014 15:10
Send private message

Yabanize:
NonprayingMantis:
mattwnz:
Tzoi: iirc the film industry is refusing to pay the $25 fine required to get the ISPs to process a claim which is why it has been solely music downloads targeted.


Maybe they haven't found anyone downloading films and it isn't a big enough problem. I mean 25 dollars is a pretty small fee, and apparently doesn't even cover ISPs admin costs in managing it. So if was a problem, I would have thought they would have made an example of some people


Lol. It's not $25 to make an example of someone. It's $25 for one notice. And then they need to send hundreds of notices to catch one person 3 times because most people don't have static ips so they have no way of tracking individual people.

So it will cost them several thousand just to get one result.


But the ISP will have logs of who had which IP when?


Right, but they don't/won't/can't tell the rights holders this information. They won't be sending emails to Sony going "hey, that guy that was downloading your movie last month has switched ips now. You can find him at xxx.xxx.xx.xx"

13447 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1616


  Reply # 1096180 26-Jul-2014 15:18
Send private message

NonprayingMantis:
mattwnz:
Tzoi: iirc the film industry is refusing to pay the $25 fine required to get the ISPs to process a claim which is why it has been solely music downloads targeted.


Maybe they haven't found anyone downloading films and it isn't a big enough problem. I mean 25 dollars is a pretty small fee, and apparently doesn't even cover ISPs admin costs in managing it. So if was a problem, I would have thought they would have made an example of some people


Lol. It's not $25 to make an example of someone. It's $25 for one notice. And then they need to send hundreds of notices to catch one person 3 times because most people don't have static ips so they have no way of tracking individual people.

So it will cost them several thousand just to get one result.


Yes $25 for one notice, so what is the most they will have to spend to take someone to the tribunal, $50 or $75? That is a lot cheaper for them than hiring expensive lawyers which maybe making $300 per hour.  Compared to the return on that, where the user can get fined quite a large amount,  that is not much. I guess if they don't use the law,  I wonder if it will remain. Isn't this what they were wanting? I mean someone has to pay for it, and I would expect that the costs would come out of their normal costs of running their business.
Last time I went to the movies it was $25 just for the ticket , so it is just the cost of a single person going to the movies.

 
 
 
 


2806 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1214


  Reply # 1096211 26-Jul-2014 16:10
Send private message

I don't recall the source, but I understood the movie studios did not consider NZ a big enough market to worry about, they had much bigger fish to fry.






Always be yourself, unless you can be Batman, then always be the Batman



20563 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3959

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1096213 26-Jul-2014 16:11
Send private message

They also have to pay the people submitting the alleged infringement notices and the people who operate the systems tracking the torrent swarms. To think that it is only $75 to take someone thru the process is a bit simple.




Richard rich.ms

6433 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1570


  Reply # 1096225 26-Jul-2014 16:22
Send private message

mattwnz:
NonprayingMantis:
mattwnz:
Tzoi: iirc the film industry is refusing to pay the $25 fine required to get the ISPs to process a claim which is why it has been solely music downloads targeted.


Maybe they haven't found anyone downloading films and it isn't a big enough problem. I mean 25 dollars is a pretty small fee, and apparently doesn't even cover ISPs admin costs in managing it. So if was a problem, I would have thought they would have made an example of some people


Lol. It's not $25 to make an example of someone. It's $25 for one notice. And then they need to send hundreds of notices to catch one person 3 times because most people don't have static ips so they have no way of tracking individual people.

So it will cost them several thousand just to get one result.


Yes $25 for one notice, so what is the most they will have to spend to take someone to the tribunal, $50 or $75? That is a lot cheaper for them than hiring expensive lawyers which maybe making $300 per hour.  Compared to the return on that, where the user can get fined quite a large amount,  that is not much. I guess if they don't use the law,  I wonder if it will remain. Isn't this what they were wanting? I mean someone has to pay for it, and I would expect that the costs would come out of their normal costs of running their business.
Last time I went to the movies it was $25 just for the ticket , so it is just the cost of a single person going to the movies.


no, thats not right.  
They can't track individuals across IP addresses, which means they have to send out hundreds, maybe thousands of notices before they get lucky and pick the same person a second time. (and same again for third time)




642 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 134


  Reply # 1096235 26-Jul-2014 16:37
Send private message

(iirc)It's roughly 3x$25+GST for the 3 strikes followed by a $200 application fee for the tribunal cost, then they also have the added costs of paying a company to detect on their behalf and potentially staff to decide who they choose to go after(ie they might be more likely to target people sharing multiples files at once or known IP addresses they have already taken action(notices) against).

The highest judgement by the tribunal so far was a $914.35 fine
http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZCopyT/2013/8.html

In this case they sent 6 notices for different infringements being unaware it was the same customer(3 were during one 28 day on-notice period where you can't get another strike) and the user was fined 6x$100+various other costs.

Generally the judgements have been around $300-500, there are ~2 other large ones including one where a person was sharing some 97 tracks so they got 3x$180 in damages+costs.

You can view them here: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZCopyT/2013/

As far as I'm aware there has been no tribunal judgements this year.

2884 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1504

Subscriber

  Reply # 1096863 28-Jul-2014 08:33
6 people support this post
Send private message





Information wants to be free. The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

 

Thinking about signing up to BigPipe? Get $20 credit with my referral link.


920 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 65

Trusted

  Reply # 1096864 28-Jul-2014 08:35
Send private message

Funniest part about the above pretty sure there's a kiwi guy who's doing just that printing off a car.

1717 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 97


  Reply # 1096871 28-Jul-2014 08:52
One person supports this post
Send private message

Ok let me get this straight There are people out there who BUY a CD?.... Still! and WHY? We must be over the tactile purchasing need by now?




Is an English Man living in New Zealand. Not a writer, an Observer he says. Graham is a seasoned 'traveler" with his sometimes arrogant, but honest opinion on life. He loves the Internet!.

 

gnfb on trademe travelkit.nz

GNFB Geeks Out on Geekzone

Email Me


xpd

The Overrated Raccoons
8445 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1145

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1096876 28-Jul-2014 09:00
One person supports this post
Send private message

gnfb: Ok let me get this straight There are people out there who BUY a CD?.... Still! and WHY? We must be over the tactile purchasing need by now?


Nope, some ppl still prefer to have something to put on the shelves..... or else the lounge/entertainment area starts looking rather boring with just an iPod in a dock. ;)






XPD / Gavin / DemiseNZ

 

For Free Games, Geekiness and Reviews, visit :

 

Home Of The Overrated Raccoons

 

 


2005 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 335

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1096906 28-Jul-2014 09:45
Send private message

scuwp: I don't recall the source, but I understood the movie studios did not consider NZ a big enough market to worry about, they had much bigger fish to fry.




Most of the reports I have seen over the years of people being done by the movie studios is of the original ripper/up-loader of the material and not so much the people downloading. I guess they get more money from prosecuting the source then from a 16 year old kid in NZ who downloaded it.  




When you live your life on Twitter and Facebook, and are only friends with like minded people on Twitter and Facebook, you are not living in the real world. You are living in a narcissistic echo chamber.

 


My thoughts are my own and are in no way representative of my employer.


819 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 25


  Reply # 1096913 28-Jul-2014 09:59
Send private message

gnfb: Ok let me get this straight There are people out there who BUY a CD?.... Still! and WHY? We must be over the tactile purchasing need by now?


If you don't mind ripping it yourself to mp3 or whatever, CDs are sometimes still cheaper.

739 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 69

Subscriber

  Reply # 1096963 28-Jul-2014 10:23
Send private message

Is it to do with scale? Thousands, or tens of thousands, of songs being downloaded, where as people are talking perhaps hundreds of movies? TV shows perhaps would be more worthwhile as the next target? With a range of music streaming options, free for some telecom subscribers, maybe this is why we hear less of the infringements for music downloads? 

With Netflix becoming more prevalent now in NZ perhaps movies/tv won't become a big target?

1717 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 97


  Reply # 1096985 28-Jul-2014 10:47
Send private message

xpd:
gnfb: Ok let me get this straight There are people out there who BUY a CD?.... Still! and WHY? We must be over the tactile purchasing need by now?


Nope, some ppl still prefer to have something to put on the shelves..... or else the lounge/entertainment area starts looking rather boring with just an iPod in a dock. ;)




On  a more serious note, That after sales feeling is still very important When you see a shelf full of plastic you feel good! That you got something for your money When you down load a book or album and it is directly transferred to your "device" Other than the entry in a list, and a debit in your credit card account, there is no "touchy freely" satisfaction. There can be a feeling of being ripped off. Companies like Apple and Tiffany's learnt this years ago. Ask any woman with a pulse  what colour a Tiffany's box is? How many people keep the box there apple product came in?  ok BTW....




Is an English Man living in New Zealand. Not a writer, an Observer he says. Graham is a seasoned 'traveler" with his sometimes arrogant, but honest opinion on life. He loves the Internet!.

 

gnfb on trademe travelkit.nz

GNFB Geeks Out on Geekzone

Email Me


20563 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3959

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1097031 28-Jul-2014 12:43
2 people support this post
Send private message

Really? I see a shelf full of plastic and think how inconvienent.




Richard rich.ms

1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

New Zealand hits peak broadband data
Posted 18-Jan-2018 12:21


Amazon Echo devices coming to New Zealand early February 2018
Posted 18-Jan-2018 10:53


$3.74 million for new electric vehicles in New Zealand
Posted 17-Jan-2018 11:27


Nova 2i: Value, not excitement from Huawei
Posted 17-Jan-2018 09:02


Less news in Facebook News Feed revamp
Posted 15-Jan-2018 13:15


Australian Government contract awarded to Datacom Connect
Posted 11-Jan-2018 08:37


Why New Zealand needs a chief technology officer
Posted 6-Jan-2018 13:59


Amazon release Silk Browser and Firefox for Fire TV
Posted 21-Dec-2017 13:42


New Chief Technology Officer role created
Posted 19-Dec-2017 22:18


All I want for Christmas is a new EV
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:54


How clever is this: AI will create 2.3 million jobs by 2020
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:52


NOW to deploy SD-WAN to regional councils
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:46


Mobile market competition issues ComCom should watch
Posted 18-Dec-2017 10:52


New Zealand government to create digital advisory group
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:47


Australia datum changes means whole country moving 1.8 metres north-east
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:39



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.