Keyboard layouts as an overview.
Part 2 will look at some of the layouts in more depth.
part 3 will cover in more depth what I propose at the end of this entry, along with the software to be used.
Part 4 will be the initial results.
Many of you may not have even really thought about it, and others of you may be like me, and have become consumed with finding the best input methodology possible...
There are a number of different (English based) keyboard layouts
Dvorak was originally developed in the 1930s by Dr August Dvorak; Dvorak spent a long time studying people
Typing, he analyzed them to try and find out what operations slowed them down.
Unfortunately Dvorak spent his entire life fighting the big corporations trying to get them to try the Dvorak
Layout. in 1970 the Dvorak layout was approved by ANSI (American National Standards Institute) as an alternate
Developed back around 1867 to 1873 by Christopher Latham Sholes, this layout was produced to stop the mechanisms
jamming, qwerty then became a bit like Windows, better alternatives originated but could not gain a foothold
Due to the complete market domination of the qwerty layout.
- Mobile phone :( (1)punctuation, (2)abc, (3)def, (4)ghi, (5)jkl, (6)mno, (7)pqrs, (8)tuv, (9)wxyz )
- Some blackberrys and similar devices- qwerty, however each key is two letters, so the top line would be (QW, ER, TY, UI, OP)
There are altered versions such as:
Qwerty based layouts
While the Colemak keyboard is a qwerty derivative, it claims to be better than both Qwerty and Dvorak.
They have a cool java applet that lets you compare between Qwerty, Dvorak and Colemak on the site.
And I must admit I haven’t written off taking a closer look at this particular layout.
Another qwerty derivative, this claims to be more efficient than Dvorak and Qwerty as well, I personally dont like the placement of the Q, I feel its Premium real - Estate.
Qwerak - This is apparently based on both the qwerty and Dvorak keyboards
Not too keen on this one, although I need to investigate further:
this is another layout that is deserving of more investigation
Then there are more original ones
Such as Plum -
I must admit I don’t like this at all.
There is the Maltron (www.maltron.com):
The Maltron seems to be more popular, however I don’t know of anyone who has used it.
There are many more too.
A lot of places around the web there is people documenting how they have written a computer algorithm, that will work out the best way of writing based on the average keys used in writing, etc.
There are neural kinetic studies to say where the keys should be placed based on the pre-existing figures of keys used.
And there are others who are analyzing common and great works to come up with the most efficient or the best layout Based on the language.
Dvorak himself did a lot of investigation based on the written language - however he also studied the typists themselves.
I think there is now a better way of approaching it.
Rather than basing it on the language, or the pure physics of the finger movements, the first thing that needs to be established is The USAGE.
With the advent of the internet a great opportunity has presented itself, the ability to collaborate on a massive scale.
I am preparing to begin a study on the typing habits of as many people as possible.
To begin with this will be involving the help of volunteers.
This is what I am proposing - I will be making available for download in the next couple of days a small statistics gathering application,
What this application will do is count key usage.
On a weekly basis it will email me statistical counts - from the volunteers account, they will be able to fully view exactly what is being sent.
I will also make the source available so that people involving themselves in the study can review the source for peace of mind :)
I will then begin collaborating the information as my intention is to find the ultimate keyboard layout.
I'll be posting shortly with information on how you can become part of the study.
Other related posts:
What Keyboard layout do you use?
Optimus Maximus, OLED Keyboard release announced.
Thought powered game controller - Emotiv releases a "mindreader"
Comment by juha, on 23-Sep-2006 14:20
Hey! Where's AZERTY?
Comment by chiefie, on 3-Oct-2006 13:23
What about New Standard keyboard (ABCD)
Comment by Akuma, on 15-Dec-2006 14:34
I'm just curious, but have you actually looked into Colemak further as you said you would? I used to be a Dvorak typist, and I changed to Colemak because I felt it was better. Honestly, I don't regret that I made the switch, but that's just me. Everyone has their own experiences.
Comment by Albert, on 2-Mar-2007 08:01
I have used QWERTY, Dvorak, and Colemak. I feel that Colemak is better than the other 2 and have been using it for exactly 1 month now (since Feb 1st). I highly recommend it.
Comment by Jules Vogel, on 7-Mar-2007 06:29
If anyone wants to conduct speed trials using the XPeRT keyboard layout, they can contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org, for a free installation program. For statistics, digraphs are of interest (see the Dvorak US patent of 1936 for a definition and set of key sequence stats) With regard to placement of Q at the left small finger location on the home row: Yes, that could be improved. However, it is less than prime, since the small finger shares a tendon with the ring finger (look for it) and is shorter (reaches the lower row better) and less dexterous. Studies and comparisons of keyboards are all welcome. Any drive to get beyond Qwerty seems worthwhile.