Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 
352 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 2


  Reply # 555205 7-Dec-2011 20:43 Send private message

JimmyH:
surfisup1000:
Elpie: 
Sky didn't air those shows - they were aired by the standard free-to-air channels such as TV3. Those channels can still air those series whenever they like. Nothing stopping them except their own scheduling and greed. 


My point being, Sky subscribers were always able to view the best shows for free (albeit delayed ). 

But now Sky has bought the rights to a whole bunch of the best shows, so the other networks may no longer have broadcasting rights. 

The money question is whether Sky and other channels still provide free broadcasts of the top shows on a delayed basis?   




You pay either way.

On Sky you pay a subscription. On free to air you pay by having your eyeballs sold to advertisers, being bombarded by 4-5 minutes of screaming ads every 7 minutes, having bits butchered out of the show fit it in the slot after making room for the ads, and being miles behind the rest of the world. Personally, I don't regard $2.30 a week as an outrageous price to pay to watch some interesting shows while avoiding that cost. I never watched them on FTA as the ads, delays and constantly being jerked around by schedulers was just too annoying.

I have a number of gripes with Sky, but the concept of offering a premium subscription channel for current quality drama screened interruption free isn't one of them.


Great Post, couldn't have said it any better. 




"In the real world as in dreams, nothing is quite what it seems" - The Book of Counted Sorrows

System -   AMD AthlonII x4 640 3.0Ghz AM3 CPU, 4GB Strontium Hynix DDR3 RAM, Gigabyte MA74GMT Motherboard,  NVIDIA GT220 1GB Graphics, Win 7 Home Premium 32.



Senility Guild

 
Pulse Web Design

173 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 11


  Reply # 555265 8-Dec-2011 00:50 Send private message

JimmyH: You pay either way.

On Sky you pay a subscription. On free to air you pay by having your eyeballs sold to advertisers, being bombarded by 4-5 minutes of screaming ads every 7 minutes, having bits butchered out of the show fit it in the slot after making room for the ads, and being miles behind the rest of the world. Personally, I don't regard $2.30 a week as an outrageous price to pay to watch some interesting shows while avoiding that cost. I never watched them on FTA as the ads, delays and constantly being jerked around by schedulers was just too annoying.

I have a number of gripes with Sky, but the concept of offering a premium subscription channel for current quality drama screened interruption free isn't one of them.


Couldn't have said it better myself JimmyH!  My biggest peeve with the FTA channels has always been unexpected/unexplained schedule changes that leave you wondering where a show has gone, only to find it weeks later in a graveyard slot or mid afternoons on the weekend.

I subscribed the first day, (my wife and I are both addicted to Game of Thrones) and don't see $10 a month as a huge price to pay.  The fact that you can get it in HD is just the icing on the cake for me... after all, isn't picture/sound quality why we've all spent thousands of $$$$$$ on our TVs and sound systems???



2509 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 245

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 555331 8-Dec-2011 09:41 Send private message

surfisup1000:
Elpie: 
Sky didn't air those shows - they were aired by the standard free-to-air channels such as TV3. Those channels can still air those series whenever they like. Nothing stopping them except their own scheduling and greed. 

But now Sky has bought the rights to a whole bunch of the best shows, so the other networks may no longer have broadcasting rights.  


That's not strictly true.  Rights holders sell two different broadcasting rights.  Free to Air, and Pay TV.  Sky purchases Pay TV rights, obviously, but that still leaves the opportunity if a FTA broadcaster wanted to for purchasing the FTA rights. 

352 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 2


  Reply # 555372 8-Dec-2011 10:42 Send private message



Couldn't have said it better myself JimmyH!  My biggest peeve with the FTA channels has always been unexpected/unexplained schedule changes that leave you wondering where a show has gone, only to find it weeks later in a graveyard slot or mid afternoons on the weekend.



This is what I hate about FTA.  I hate it when they remove a show with huge ratings in the states to late hours, afternoons or weekends, or remove them all together.

Not every one wants fat reality shows and cooking shows to watch.

Soho seems far more sophisticated and I can't wait for them to add more shows.   I love watching Dexter in HD.  The opening scene you can see his fingerprints.  So amazing.




"In the real world as in dreams, nothing is quite what it seems" - The Book of Counted Sorrows

System -   AMD AthlonII x4 640 3.0Ghz AM3 CPU, 4GB Strontium Hynix DDR3 RAM, Gigabyte MA74GMT Motherboard,  NVIDIA GT220 1GB Graphics, Win 7 Home Premium 32.



Senility Guild

 
Pulse Web Design

1575 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 221


  Reply # 555381 8-Dec-2011 11:22 Send private message

kiwipearls:


Couldn't have said it better myself JimmyH!  My biggest peeve with the FTA channels has always been unexpected/unexplained schedule changes that leave you wondering where a show has gone, only to find it weeks later in a graveyard slot or mid afternoons on the weekend.



This is what I hate about FTA.  I hate it when they remove a show with huge ratings in the states to late hours, afternoons or weekends, or remove them all together.

Not every one wants fat reality shows and cooking shows to watch.

Soho seems far more sophisticated and I can't wait for them to add more shows.   I love watching Dexter in HD.  The opening scene you can see his fingerprints.  So amazing.



I've never noticed a problem with schedule changes myself. Mysky handles recordings and you can fast forward ads at 30x speed. 

Another thing I'm curious about, is how Soho will affect blu-ray release dates.

If the blu-ray releases will be earlier, then that would suit me just perfectly. The blu-ray package is far superior to the broadcast version and you get to watch at will. 

5282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 790


  Reply # 555400 8-Dec-2011 11:56 Send private message

Kyanar:
surfisup1000:
Elpie: 
Sky didn't air those shows - they were aired by the standard free-to-air channels such as TV3. Those channels can still air those series whenever they like. Nothing stopping them except their own scheduling and greed. 

But now Sky has bought the rights to a whole bunch of the best shows, so the other networks may no longer have broadcasting rights.  


That's not strictly true.  Rights holders sell two different broadcasting rights.  Free to Air, and Pay TV.  Sky purchases Pay TV rights, obviously, but that still leaves the opportunity if a FTA broadcaster wanted to for purchasing the FTA rights. 


pretty sure that isn't true. It it was, then TVNZ wouldn't need to bid against sky for rights to, say, the super 15.

there are different kinds of rights, but they aren't split by pay tv vs FTA,  they are split by the window and ownership model
i.e. live, delayed, catchup etc, or pay per view vs download to own, that kind of thing

2509 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 245

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 557518 13-Dec-2011 16:32 Send private message

NonprayingMantis: pretty sure that isn't true. It it was, then TVNZ wouldn't need to bid against sky for rights to, say, the super 15.

there are different kinds of rights, but they aren't split by pay tv vs FTA,  they are split by the window and ownership model
i.e. live, delayed, catchup etc, or pay per view vs download to own, that kind of thing


It appears to be up to the broadcaster, though from much scouring it looks like the most common arrangement is to sell free-to-air, radio, internet and pay-tv rights separately.  Super XV is one of the (it looks like) few sporting events which does not. 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





Trending now »

Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Government Limos
Created by networkn, last reply by Bung on 31-Oct-2014 12:39 (94 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


Snap refuses to replace faulty gear
Created by Brendan, last reply by MadEngineer on 28-Oct-2014 19:07 (92 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


Shutup and take my money (via NFC on my mobile phone)
Created by sxz, last reply by sonyxperiageek on 31-Oct-2014 22:34 (24 replies)
Pages... 2


How good is your general Science Knowledge?
Created by Aredwood, last reply by PhantomNVD on 1-Nov-2014 10:29 (41 replies)
Pages... 2 3


OneDrive code giveaway - go!
Created by freitasm, last reply by PhantomNVD on 1-Nov-2014 10:31 (36 replies)
Pages... 2 3


Uber: a cheaper taxi ride?
Created by kingdragonfly, last reply by livisun on 31-Oct-2014 14:47 (34 replies)
Pages... 2 3


DDos Protection from ISP
Created by charsleysa, last reply by freitasm on 31-Oct-2014 12:11 (46 replies)
Pages... 2 3 4


Sky will be 'upgrading software' of My Sky to connect to internet. What does that mean?
Created by Geektastic, last reply by Jase2985 on 1-Nov-2014 07:06 (28 replies)
Pages... 2



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.