Quickflix on TelstraClear? Unmetered or not?

Forums › Quickflix › Quickflix on TelstraClear? Unmetered or not?

dets00b

60 posts

Master Geek

Topic # 99883 29-Mar-2012 08:52
Hi, is telstraclear going to un-meter quickflix?

1 | 2

don@i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz
3145 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

Reply # 601725 29-Mar-2012 09:44
+1 Promote New Zealand - Get yourself a .kiwi.nz domain name!!! Check out mine - i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz

Poll

187 posts

Master Geek

Reply # 601729 29-Mar-2012 09:57
Add my interest to this question.

DoomlordVekk

112 posts

Master Geek

Trusted

Subscriber

Reply # 601773 29-Mar-2012 10:48
Short of Quickflix putting a CDN node here in NZ, there would be significant cost involved in shifting that volume of traffic from Australaia to NZ. I guess there might also be rights holding issues potentially as well? Be nice if someone gave Sky a kick in it's ever expanding behind, content-wise... "Customers don’t expect you to be perfect. They do expect you to fix things when they go wrong." Donald Porter – British Airways The views expressed here are my own and are not reflective of other organisms or organisations.

DonGould

don@i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz
3145 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

Reply # 601803 29-Mar-2012 11:21
DoomlordVekk: Short of Quickflix putting a CDN node here in NZ, there would be significant cost involved in shifting that volume of traffic from Australaia to NZ. I guess there might also be rights holding issues potentially as well? Be nice if someone gave Sky a kick in it's ever expanding behind, content-wise... Yet two other national ISPs are managing this. I also really don't see what the issue is with putting a CDN in a TCL data center either. Perhaps I am missing something? It seems to me, that if you have 10,000 TCL customers using Quickflix then they're going to be using CDN capacity some where. I do get the whole scale answer to a point... 1 CDN node - 1000 customers, 20% spare - allows - 1200 customers 1 CDN node - 1000 customers, 20% spare - allows - 1200 customers 1 CDN node - 1000 customers, 20% spare - allows - 1200 customers 1 CDN node - 1000 customers, 20% spare - allows - 1200 customers 1 CDN node - 1000 customers, 20% spare - allows - 1200 customers Do this 5 times and you've got a whole node of head room... Where as if you build one bigger node in Australia with scale then you can potentially bring down the percentage of head room required to ensure the same QoS. You also have less boxes to have to manage, a bigger faster box uses less power than 2 smaller slower ones, all the obvious stuff kicks in.... But I came back to 'how are the other ISPs doing this'? I do get the obvious answers... because they're smaller, the amount of volume they're bringing to the table means they can pick up the capacity from the existing .au head room without having much impact until their customer base actually grows enough to add more CDN capacity which could then be dropped in .nz. Where as with Telstra, there's a better than even chance that on announcement, Telstra will bring more customers to the table all in one hit than the spare headroom in Australia and this will mean that a CDN node is needed here from day one. I also get the conflict of interest with Tbox, which was/is targeted to deliver rich content, but so far has been such a fail that it must be really frustrating the TCL guys who had plans queued up behind it. D Promote New Zealand - Get yourself a .kiwi.nz domain name!!! Check out mine - i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz

Gremlin

67 posts

Master Geek

Reply # 601871 29-Mar-2012 12:30
+1

kiwipawl

140 posts

Master Geek

Reply # 601875 29-Mar-2012 12:35
+1 as long as it doesn't stall all the time like all the other streaming video.

openmedia

1338 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Reply # 601898 29-Mar-2012 13:22
I'm considering Telstra at the moment as a switch from Orcon. I'd like to see them adopting services like this. Generally known online as OpenMedia, now working for Red Hat New Zealand as a Solution Architect for all things Linux, Virtual and of course Cloud. Still playing with MythTV and digital media on the side.

jonherries

706 posts

Ultimate Geek

Reply # 602503 30-Mar-2012 13:52
+1

twisted

37 posts

Geek

Reply # 604902 4-Apr-2012 09:16
+1

CapBBeard

127 posts

Master Geek

Reply # 605139 4-Apr-2012 15:48
Another +1 here.

geekiegeek

1130 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Reply # 605144 4-Apr-2012 15:56
As a content provider themselves I cant see TCL doing this but you never know. "Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." My thoughts are my own and are in no way representative of my employer.

Monza

86 posts

Master Geek

Reply # 605703 5-Apr-2012 13:29
+1 Considering the ongoing issue with TLC and iSky I'm not holding my breath.

Quinny

198 posts

Master Geek

Trusted

Reply # 607424 10-Apr-2012 14:12
Yeah the no iSky sucks the big one more than Quickflix. I pay for the Sky already. Both would be nice but as mentioned not holding my breath.

jermsie

297 posts

Ultimate Geek

Reply # 608165 12-Apr-2012 11:38
How about no zero-rating anything? Keep the net neutral... – J

NonprayingMantis

3734 posts

Uber Geek

Reply # 608191 12-Apr-2012 12:27
yeah, one would think that support fornet neutrality would be strong here, but seems tonot be the case. I don't see the fuss over unmetering from people on this forum tbh- most self repsecting geeks will be on at least a 60GB plan, whihc provides plenty of room for quickflix. Personally I am on a 100GB plan which mostly goes on torrenting. However since QF launched I have watched much more streaming, and done a whole lot less torrenting, so my overall usage remains about the same. Or, to look at it another way, if you can ditch multiroom and/or sky movies for quickflix then that frees up $25+ to spend on data upgrades, which on most prividers will get you at least 20GB - which translates to over 20 hours of movies a month, or around 5 movies per week.

1 | 2