Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Gartner Recommends Companies Delay Blackberry Deployments in the US
Posted on 9-Dec-2005 21:03 | Tags Filed under: News



Companies should stop or delay mission-critical Blackberry deployments in the US, according to research company Gartner. The announcement comes after the possibility of a court injunction effectively ending RIM's operations in the USA was disclosed.

This latest court decision has caused Gartner to re-evaluate its long-held position on RIM's struggle with NTP.

The District Court ruled that the Term Sheet entered between the parties in March 2005 to settle the litigation was not an enforceable agreement. Other details of the ruling were filed under seal by the District Court.

Gartner says the court appears to be unwilling to wait for the Patent Office to issue a final verdict on NTP's patent claims, a process that, while it might end in RIM's favor, could take years.

While RIM would have to shut down its U.S. operations, public safety, governmental operations and government contractors could be exempt. U.S. BlackBerry users would lose messaging services, and international users would lose message service while traveling in the USA.

Gartner believes RIM and NTP will reach a settlement within three weeks. Such an agreement would be in both companies' interests, and any long-term negative impact on RIM would likely be minimal. If no settlement is reached, RIM will likely appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The research firms recommendations for current and prospective RIM customers includes stop or delaying all mission-critical BlackBerry deployments and investments in the platform until RIM's legal position is clarified. It also calls for RIM's work-around plans be made available in detail and in public and carefully review their legal and operational impact.

RIM disclosed plans to file a request that the U.S. Supreme Court accept an appeal of the Federal Circuit’s August 2, 2005 decision in relation to its affirmation of infringement on 7 litigated patent claims.










comments powered by Disqus


Trending now »

Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Bombing at Manchester concert, 19 dead
Created by Rikkitic, last reply by Rikkitic on 28-May-2017 19:06 (174 replies)
Pages... 10 11 12


Father banned from watching daughter's netball game: what you think of this?
Created by Rikkitic, last reply by frankv on 25-May-2017 16:29 (136 replies)
Pages... 8 9 10


Tailgaters?
Created by Linuxluver, last reply by reg52nz on 25-May-2017 16:29 (113 replies)
Pages... 6 7 8


The President Of The USA: Donald Trump
Created by TimA, last reply by frankv on 29-May-2017 09:55 (4373 replies)
Pages... 290 291 292


How much power do you use?
Created by tchart, last reply by WyleECoyoteNZ on 29-May-2017 13:40 (41 replies)
Pages... 2 3


Tipping? Please no!
Created by BlueShift, last reply by cddt on 27-May-2017 10:10 (104 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


Tax Cuts
Created by tdgeek, last reply by Geektastic on 29-May-2017 12:26 (99 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


Sony smart TV functions
Created by Rikkitic, last reply by Rikkitic on 28-May-2017 21:25 (17 replies)
Pages... 2