![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
clevedon:NonprayingMantis:rugrat: I paid $600.
If i was payinging a monthly rental, sky would be gone burger, rather own my own recorder, then have to pay rent for it and then pay quite high cost for additional channels on top.
By own, i mean not pay monthly fee just to have box in house, so i'm able to purchase services from them.
Paid $600 and have two mysky hdi decoders. At $20 a month each for roughly 8 years each would be $3840, hmmm think paying $600 one off way better.
Be a bit more because one is the plus.
Then there's the hd ticket if don't have multiroom, ouch.
And the box is network cabable. Just sky seems real slow in implementing it, all it needs is a software update.
it is $15 per month. and MySkyHDi was launched in 2008, which is 5 years ago, not 8.
the MySky+ was launched in June 2011, slightly over 2 years ago.
if you had 2 x MySky HDi boxes purchased at launch, then upgrade one to the MySky+ when it launched, you would have paid just under $2000 total for the rentals, not $3840 vs the $1350 (not $600) you actually paid upfront ($600 for each box, and a one-off $149 to upgrade one to a MySky+)
So yes, you were better off by buying the box but your maths is terrible
I think he meant he paid $600 upfront for the original MySky SD boxes back 8 years ago (as we did to) and upgraded to the HDi when they came out so he's not that far out on his numbers.
NonprayingMantis:clevedon:NonprayingMantis:rugrat: I paid $600.
If i was payinging a monthly rental, sky would be gone burger, rather own my own recorder, then have to pay rent for it and then pay quite high cost for additional channels on top.
By own, i mean not pay monthly fee just to have box in house, so i'm able to purchase services from them.
Paid $600 and have two mysky hdi decoders. At $20 a month each for roughly 8 years each would be $3840, hmmm think paying $600 one off way better.
Be a bit more because one is the plus.
Then there's the hd ticket if don't have multiroom, ouch.
And the box is network cabable. Just sky seems real slow in implementing it, all it needs is a software update.
it is $15 per month. and MySkyHDi was launched in 2008, which is 5 years ago, not 8.
the MySky+ was launched in June 2011, slightly over 2 years ago.
if you had 2 x MySky HDi boxes purchased at launch, then upgrade one to the MySky+ when it launched, you would have paid just under $2000 total for the rentals, not $3840 vs the $1350 (not $600) you actually paid upfront ($600 for each box, and a one-off $149 to upgrade one to a MySky+)
So yes, you were better off by buying the box but your maths is terrible
I think he meant he paid $600 upfront for the original MySky SD boxes back 8 years ago (as we did to) and upgraded to the HDi when they came out so he's not that far out on his numbers.
ah ok, was it a free upgrade at the time to go from MySky to MySky HDi?
Lurch: Never bothered with Mysky (and haven't had sky in a very long time) Who would spend $600 for a box yet not actually own it and have to return it back if you stop Sky? Crazy.
You would be better off buying a MagicTV/Tivo or HTPC.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |