![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Yabanize: IMO the pricing needs to be $20 a month, $5 a week
Sixth Labour Government - "Vision without Execution is just Hallucination"
ockel:Yabanize: IMO the pricing needs to be $20 a month, $5 a week
Everyone else charges ~$10-15/week PER sport. For 4 channels of 24hr sport for a week at $20 thats 672 potential hours of viewing so 3c as a Cost Per Viewing Hour (the industry metric).
Kirk
kharris:ockel:Yabanize: IMO the pricing needs to be $20 a month, $5 a week
Everyone else charges ~$10-15/week PER sport. For 4 channels of 24hr sport for a week at $20 thats 672 potential hours of viewing so 3c as a Cost Per Viewing Hour (the industry metric).
Wow! You've got a spreadsheet! now that is dedication ;-)
Sixth Labour Government - "Vision without Execution is just Hallucination"
ockel:kharris:ockel:Yabanize: IMO the pricing needs to be $20 a month, $5 a week
Everyone else charges ~$10-15/week PER sport. For 4 channels of 24hr sport for a week at $20 thats 672 potential hours of viewing so 3c as a Cost Per Viewing Hour (the industry metric).
Wow! You've got a spreadsheet! now that is dedication ;-)
I wondered how pricing was compared to everything else. And whether perception (of outrageous pricing) was reality.
Seems not.
Kirk
kharris:ockel:kharris:ockel:Yabanize: IMO the pricing needs to be $20 a month, $5 a week
Everyone else charges ~$10-15/week PER sport. For 4 channels of 24hr sport for a week at $20 thats 672 potential hours of viewing so 3c as a Cost Per Viewing Hour (the industry metric).
Wow! You've got a spreadsheet! now that is dedication ;-)
I wondered how pricing was compared to everything else. And whether perception (of outrageous pricing) was reality.
Seems not.
No offence meant... I just had a giggle... was thinking you must have been trying to justify the price to another family member aka the boss?
Sixth Labour Government - "Vision without Execution is just Hallucination"
kharris:Finch:networkn: use 64 9 xxx xxxx
Assuming you are in Auckland. That is the international way to dial a number.
If it won't take that try +64 9 xxx xxxx
I am in Wgtn.
Doesn't work though.
WTF?
Just had the same issue... it's a bit dumb because the other formats are perfectly valid as phone numbers, but you have to use the following format
64-XXXXXXXXXX
i.e. 64-491234567
If you use any of the following it will not work
64 491234576
64 4 91234576
64 4 9123 4567
64-4-91234567
64-4-9123-4567
+64-41234567
surfisup1000:
. . . there are free tools that can be used to validate phone numbers
Kirk
Kirk
Any comments made are my personal views and does not represent those of my employer
taneb1: Used Fanpass this morning in the office to watch the All Blacks game at the office and was pretty impressed with the service overall.
The only frustrating thing I found was not being able to signup via their App, you need to visit the website to register before you can use it.
Other then that there was no buffering, HD quality and the chromecast support was perfect meaning we didn't have to get a laptop all setup to watch it.
Finch: Another question,
Do these $5 Passes stack? Guessing they don't, but thought it was worth the ask anyway. IE: Can I buy 10 of them, to last me 10 weeks? Lol.
stocksp: Ive tried using the fanpassrwc5 code but it says it is not valid. Anyone else have the same problem?
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |