Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
timmmay
20859 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5350

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #447994 13-Mar-2011 14:36
Send private message

When you talk about iso performance I find it best to think in terms of a final print, not what the file looks like at 100%. In that case a 20MP P&S and a 6MP P&S released about the same time would give similar results for say an 8x12" print. The only real advantage of more MP is the ability to crop, with the downside of bigger files that don't really have more information.



alasta
6891 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3365

Trusted
Subscriber

  #448006 13-Mar-2011 15:41
Send private message

timmmay: When you talk about iso performance I find it best to think in terms of a final print, not what the file looks like at 100%. In that case a 20MP P&S and a 6MP P&S released about the same time would give similar results for say an 8x12" print. The only real advantage of more MP is the ability to crop, with the downside of bigger files that don't really have more information.


Yes, but as you crop you gradually get closer to viewing at 100%, and then admittedly there is some validity in the argument that more pixels correlates to more noise.

I agree entirely that generally the end result on media is what really matters though.

1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.