|
|
|
tdgeek: Mauricio, can you correct my post above as in
The crossbar effect wasnt expensive, maybe $40 extra per pane.
timmmay: Kenny's right, retrofit double glazing doesn't look awesome. It looks fine, depends how fussy you are. It's about 20% the cost of real double glazing, and maybe 60-80% as effective, so it's great value.
Good point about the moisture too, it's still there, and needs to be flushed out. I have a DVS/HRV type unit that goes on 11-4 each day, which pushes the moist air out. That makes it easier for the heat pump too, heating dry air is much easier than heating air filled with water.
KennyM: Id just like to point out I was refering to the 'addon' retrofitting....The type of double glazing my work does replaces the glass, beading and sash material. the 'addon' one is just a stick on piece.
But thats going off topic : )
mattwnz:timmmay: Kenny's right, retrofit double glazing doesn't look awesome. It looks fine, depends how fussy you are. It's about 20% the cost of real double glazing, and maybe 60-80% as effective, so it's great value.
Good point about the moisture too, it's still there, and needs to be flushed out. I have a DVS/HRV type unit that goes on 11-4 each day, which pushes the moist air out. That makes it easier for the heat pump too, heating dry air is much easier than heating air filled with water.
You can now get really thin double glazing panels that will fit into timber frames, but not sure if it is available in NZ yet. Positive ventilation systems don't work in all situations, but for your bog standard 120 square metre house, they do appear to be effective, at reducing condensation.
|
|
|