Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
mclean
584 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 182

Subscriber

  #2005289 30-Apr-2018 15:51
Send private message

kryptonjohn: You don't "have" to remedy it - it's OK to sell with the non permitted structure noted on the LIM, just as it is legal to sell a house that doesn't have a C&C for work done. The risk is that it pushes down your sale price.

 

But in the case that it's a 3x3 garden shed sitting on the ground... if I was a buyer I wouldn't personally care if it was noted on the LIM as an unpermitted structure due to its temporary nature and the fact that I could simply remove it if I ever felt the need.

 

The real risk is getting a grumpy neighbour complaining to the council as happened in the news story cited earlier in this thread.

 

Correct.  The thing is the council has no record of unconsented work so the LIM report misses it. The only way a purchaser can identify it is to compare what's on the ground with what's in the council building file.  That's quite a tall order for many purchasers and requires some knowledge of the building code. So it comes down the vendor's warranty in the S&P Agreement.

 

I'd say most purchasers, if they find out there is unconsented work, want it remedied. Which is the last thing you need in a sale process.

 

I guess what I'm saying that if you're building something that needs a building consent then you should get one.




kryptonjohn
2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 953

Lifetime subscriber

  #2005300 30-Apr-2018 16:04
Send private message

Yep The easiest remedy for an unconsented kitset shed is probably to put it on TM. Easier and less expensive than going to council for a permit. Alternatively just list the property with the shed noted as excluded from the chattels.

 

But if I was the purchaser, I would probably rather the shed be left where it is. Gotta put the lawnmower somewhere!

 

 


wellygary
8813 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5294


  #2005322 30-Apr-2018 16:46
Send private message

kryptonjohn:

 

Yep The easiest remedy for an unconsented kitset shed is probably to put it on TM. Easier and less expensive than going to council for a permit. Alternatively just list the property with the shed noted as excluded from the chattels.

 

But if I was the purchaser, I would probably rather the shed be left where it is. Gotta put the lawnmower somewhere!

 

 

Stick wheels on it and call it a "tiny shed" and get away from council rules all together....




kryptonjohn
2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 953

Lifetime subscriber

  #2005323 30-Apr-2018 16:48
Send private message

wellygary:

 

kryptonjohn:

 

Yep The easiest remedy for an unconsented kitset shed is probably to put it on TM. Easier and less expensive than going to council for a permit. Alternatively just list the property with the shed noted as excluded from the chattels.

 

But if I was the purchaser, I would probably rather the shed be left where it is. Gotta put the lawnmower somewhere!

 

 

Stick wheels on it and call it a "tiny shed" and get away from council rules all together....

 

 

I thought it would have had such an exemption already, but it doesn't, so don't expect wheels will help! :-)

 

 

 

 


1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.