Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
evilengineer
466 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 367


  #2241389 20-May-2019 13:28
Send private message

Bung:
timmmay:

 

A builder friend quoted $3795 to remove the window, replace with weatherboards, insulated, gib, and plaster but not paint. In the past I did find a builder who would've done the building work for $2K, no plastering or painting. There are fairly strict building codes now.

 




I have no idea whether $3800 is fair but I don't think there are any real differences in the standard of work required except insulation in last 70 years for that sort of change. Too many things are blamed on Codes or H&S.

 

You'd need a 20mm drained cavity space between the back of the weatherboards and the building wrap plus the insulation on a new wall that wouldn't have been required 70 years ago.

 

So the codes have moved on.

 

Although to be fair, you might get away without if it's infilling a localised opening and you're matching the existing construction.




esawers
559 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 94


  #2241473 20-May-2019 14:17
Send private message

evilengineer:

 

Bung:
timmmay:

 

A builder friend quoted $3795 to remove the window, replace with weatherboards, insulated, gib, and plaster but not paint. In the past I did find a builder who would've done the building work for $2K, no plastering or painting. There are fairly strict building codes now.

 




I have no idea whether $3800 is fair but I don't think there are any real differences in the standard of work required except insulation in last 70 years for that sort of change. Too many things are blamed on Codes or H&S.

 

You'd need a 20mm drained cavity space between the back of the weatherboards and the building wrap plus the insulation on a new wall that wouldn't have been required 70 years ago.

 

So the codes have moved on.

 

Although to be fair, you might get away without if it's infilling a localised opening and you're matching the existing construction.

 

 

 

 

We made a last minute decision to remove a double hung window while in the middle of renovations a few years ago (literally as the builder was about to put the gib on that wall he was told to stop), it cost us $1000 to remove the window, add building paper and insulation, and replace the weatherboards -  it took the builder about 3 hours. 


bfginger
1330 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 191


  #2253005 6-Jun-2019 13:41
Send private message

timmmay:

I'd want something to reduce the light by 90%+, not sure that would do that. Privacy isn't relevant for this window.

 

 

That's quite possible. If they'd used supergrey instead of grey that would have reduced light down to 8%.

 

 

https://www.viridianglass.com/-/media/viridian-glass/files/downloads/performance-data/viridian-glass-energy-performance-data_22052017.pdf

 

 


1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.